Cited by 31COVID-19 and Mental HealthCommunication and COVID-19 ImpactPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

The associations between media use, peritraumatic distress, anxiety and resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic

Open access
Levaot, Yael, Greene, Talya, Palgi, Yuval·2022·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between media use, experiences of media use as having a negative and/or positive impact on coping, peritraumatic distress, anxiety symptoms and resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic. A convenience sample of 902 Israeli adults (mean age = 46.21) completed measures of peritraumatic distress, anxiety symptoms and resilience, and reported on their media use experiences one month following the initial outbreak of the disease in Israel (April 2020). After controlling for COVID-19 related events and demographic covariates, experiencing media use as having a negative impact on coping was related to higher levels of peritraumatic distress and anxiety symptoms and lower levels of resilience. In contrast, experiencing media as having a positive impact was not related to peritraumatic distress, anxiety symptoms or resilience. The findings suggest that those reporting that media use had a negative impact on coping are at greater risk of experiencing higher levels of peritraumatic distress and anxiety symptoms as well as lower resilience. In addition, traditional media use was related to higher resiliency. Developing understanding of how media could be used to optimally support emergency responses is crucial in order to minimize psychopathology. Unified, clear, trustworthy and informative messaging has a special importance during a mass public health crisis. Further research will contribute to guidance of potential risk and resilience aspects of media use during emergencies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.11.018

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Detrimental psychological effects of excessive pandemic-related media exposure include heightened levels of anxiety, depression, psychological distress, posttraumatic stress symptoms, schizotypal traits, and substance use.

    “These effects include heightened levels of anxiety [64], depression [64,65], psychological distress [66,67], posttraumatic stress symptoms [68], schizotypal traits [69], and substance use [70].”

    From Impact of Media-Induced Uncertainty on Mental Health: Narrative-Based Perspective. (2025) · cites this paper as [67]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) links perceived negative media use during COVID-19 with higher anxiety and peritraumatic distress. The Introduction also reports associations with depression and PTSD symptoms from earlier studies. The paper does not address schizotypal traits or substance use, and its Discussion says it did not measure the quantity of media use or establish causation; it therefore cannot support those outcomes as effects of excessive exposure. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levaot, Y., Greene, T., & Palgi, Y.
Affiliations
University of Haifa (IL)
Corresponding author
Levaot, Yael
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
145
Pages
334-338
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3095416983
Cited by
31
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
media use, peritraumatic distress, anxiety symptoms, resilience, COVID-19 pandemic, coping, traditional media, emergency response, public health crisis, Israeli adults
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Middle Aged, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review