CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 319Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPediatric Pain Management TechniquesPain Management and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the German version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale

Open access
Meyer, Kathrin, Sprott, Haiko, Mannion, Anne Frances·2008·Journal of Psychosomatic Research
DOI 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.12.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Objective In patients with chronic pain, catastrophizing is a significant determinant of self-rated pain intensity and disability. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) was developed to assist with both treatment planning and outcome assessment; to date, no German version has been validated.Methods A cross-cultural adaptation of the PCS into German was carried out, strictly according to recommended methods. A questionnaire booklet containing the PCS, visual analogue scales (numeric rating scale) for pain intensity and general health, the ZUNG self-rating depression scale, the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ), the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), and the Roland-Morris (RM) disability questionnaire was completed by 111 patients with chronic low back pain (mean age, 49 years), 100 of which also completed it again 7 days later.Results Cronbach's alpha (internal reliability) for the three subsections of the PCS--helplessness, magnification, rumination--and for the whole questionnaire (PCSwhole) were .89, .67, .88, and .92, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficients of agreement for the reproducibility were .81, .67, .78, and .80, respectively. The PCSwhole scores correlated with the other scores as follows: pain intensity r=.26, general health r=-.29, ZUNG r=.52, MSPQ r=.53, FABQactivity r=.51, FABQwork r=.61 and RM r=.57. Factor analysis revealed three factors, with an almost identical factor structure to that reported in previous studies.Conclusion The psychometric properties of our German version of the PCS were comparable to those reported in previous studies for the original English version. It represents a valuable tool in the assessment of German-speaking chronic low back pain patients.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.12.004

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Klaber Moffett J, Richardson G, Sheldon TA, Maynard A. Back pain: its management and cost to society. Center for Health Economics/NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination/University of York (economic review) 1995.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–318 of 318

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Meyer, K., Sprott, H., & Mannion, A. F.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Zurich (CH)
  • Schulthess-Klinik (CH)
Corresponding author
Meyer, Kathrin
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
64
Issue
5
Pages
469-478
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.12.004
OpenAlex
W2117529812
Cited by
319
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 21
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
Pain Catastrophizing Scale, pain catastrophizing, chronic low back pain, cross-cultural adaptation, German version, psychometric validation, reliability statistics, validity, helplessness, pain magnification, rumination, fear-avoidance beliefs, depression, disability
MeSH terms
Acculturation, Adaptation, Psychological, Chronic Disease, Culture, Germany, Humans, Language, Pain, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review