Cited by 28Cancer survivorship and carePsychometric Methodologies and TestingChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Mini-mental adjustment to cancer scale: construct validation in Spanish breast cancer patients

Andreu Vaillo, Yolanda, Murgui Pérez, Sergio, Martínez López, Paula, Romero Retes, Rocío·2018·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Objective The Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale (MiniMAC) is widely used to evaluate cancer patients' psychological responses to diagnosis and treatment. Validation studies of the scale have shown inconsistency in the obtained factor structures. The aim of this study was to explore the factor structure, using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and other psychometric properties of the MiniMAC in Spanish breast cancer patients.Methods A sample of 368 women with breast cancer completed the MiniMAC and the 18 items version of the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18).Results The original pentafactorial model and three additional models derived from the empirical research -two first-order structures with four and three factors, and a second-order bifactorial structure- were tested. The five-factor model showed the best model fit and largely replicated the original MiniMAC's subscales. Five factors had acceptable reliability and showed modest correlations with emotional distress in the expected direction.Conclusions The Spanish version of the MiniMAC has a satisfactory overall performance and serves as a brief, reliable and valid tool measuring cognitive appraisals and ensuing reactions to cancer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.09.004

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andreu Vaillo, Y., Murgui Pérez, S., Martínez López, P., & Romero Retes, R.
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
114
Pages
38-44
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2889839018
Cited by
28
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Government of Spain (PSI2013-45905-R)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
breast cancer, psychological adjustment to cancer, coping, factor structure, bifactor model, cognitive appraisal, emotional distress, Spanish adaptation, psychometric validation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Spain, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review