Cited by 22COVID-19 and Mental HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMental Health Treatment and Access

Impact of COVID-19 on mental health according to prior depression status: A mental health survey of community prospective cohort data

Open access
Jung, Sun Jae, Jeon, Ye Jin, Yang, Ji Su, Park, Minseo, Kim, Kwanghyun, Chibnik, Lori B., Kim, Hyeon Chang, Koenen, Karestan C.·2021·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Objective We aimed to investigate the mental health impact of COVID-19 on a demographically well-characterized population cohort by gender and previous depression status.Methods Among people who participated in a community cohort study between 2013 and 2018 with previous depression measurement, a total of 1928 people without quarantine experience (680 men and 1249 women) were included after responding to an online survey in March 2020. In the 2020 survey, people were queried about daily needs supply, social support, risk perception, change during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as mental health indices measuring loneliness, anxiety symptoms, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and depression. Separate analyses by gender were conducted to assess the association between COVID-19-related experiences and each mental health index, using multivariable logistic regressions with additional adjustment and stratification with pre-existing depression status.Results We could not observe significant gender differences for depression, anxiety, PTSD, and loneliness at 55 days after the start of the COVID-19 outbreak. Most external support, including daily needs supply and social support, protected men and women from experiencing severe anxiety (for life supply, OR = 0.92 (95%CI 0.88-0.97) (men) and OR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.91-0.99) (women); for social support, OR = 0.92(both for men and women, p < 0.01)). The results were similar for depression and PTSD. External support showed a larger reduction in the likelihoods for anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic among people with pre-existing depression compared to previously healthy people, and it was more prominent in men.Conclusion COVID-19 significantly affected the mental health of both men and women in the early period of the pandemic. Having enough supply of daily needs and social support seems important, especially for people with previous depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110552

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social distancing, in association with limited social support and interpersonal communication, has worsened depression, fear, insomnia, and anxiety symptoms.

    “Such social distancing, in association with limited social support and interpersonal communication, has worsened depression, fear, insomnia, and anxiety symptoms [20].”
  • The prevalence of anxiety in this study (10.6%) was much higher than the 2.4% reported in a previous national survey based on lifetime prevalence.

    “In total, 10.6% of the participants were likely to have generalized anxiety disorder, as indicated by scores of 10 or higher on the GAD-7, which was much higher than the proportion of 2.4% reported in a previous national survey based on lifetime prevalence [20].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]Beck A. Steer R. Brown G. Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II) 1996 Psychological Corporation San Antonio, TX

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jung, S. J., Jeon, Y. J., Yang, J. S., Park, M., Kim, K., Chibnik, L. B., Kim, H. C., & Koenen, K. C.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Yonsei University (KR)
Corresponding author
Jung, Sun Jae
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
148
Pages
110552
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3176112455
Cited by
22
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2020R1C1C1003502)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
  • Yonsei University College of Medicine (6-2019-0114)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, mental health, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, loneliness, social support, gender differences, community-based cohort
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Time Factors, Causality, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review