The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social norms and energy conservation
Abstract
This paper evaluates a series of programs run by a company called OPOWER to send Home Energy Report letters to residential utility customers comparing their electricity use to that of their neighbors. Using data from randomized natural field experiments at 600,000 treatment and control households across the United States, I estimate that the average program reduces energy consumption by 2.0%. The program provides additional evidence that non-price interventions can substantially and cost effectively change consumer behavior: the effect is equivalent to that of a short-run electricity price increase of 11 to 20%, and the cost effectiveness compares favorably to that of traditional energy conservation programs. Perhaps because the treatment included descriptive social norms, effects are heterogeneous: households in the highest decile of pre-treatment consumption decrease usage by 6.3%, while consumption by the lowest decile decreases by only 0.3%. A regression discontinuity design shows that different categories of “injunctive norms” played an insignificant role in encouraging relatively low users not to increase usage.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A large meta-analysis found that significant residential energy savings can be achieved [215], by targeting the right interventions to the right households [14,16,17].”
From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
Cites
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7466396 · Cited by 20,065
How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates?
Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355304772839588 · Cited by 10,641
A Theory of the Allocation of Time
Becker, G. S. (1965) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2228949 · Cited by 10,354
Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies
Rubin, D. B. (1974) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0037350 · Cited by 9,436 · cited 2×
“Nearly all are within the confidence intervals of the small sample pilots by Schultz et al. (2007) and Nolan et al.”
BackgroundA Simple Model of Herd Behavior
Banerjee, A. V. (1992) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118364 · Cited by 6,556 · cited 1×
“[15] Banerjee, Abhijit (1992).”
Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015 · Cited by 5,965 · cited 2×
“[32] Cialdini, Robert, Raymond Reno, and Carl Kallgren (1990).”
BackgroundAkerlof, G., & Kranton, R. (2000) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355300554881 · Cited by 5,824 · cited 1×
“[5] Akerlof, George, and Rachel Kranton (2000).”
Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation
Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.47.1.5 · Cited by 4,926
Regression discontinuity designs in economics
Lee, D. S., & Lemieux, T. (2010) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.48.2.281 · Cited by 4,534
Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice
Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2007) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.001 · Cited by 3,701
Flagged first, then by citations
5 of the 104 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Friedrich, 2009, Saving Energy Cost-Effectively: A National Review of the Cost of Energy Saved through Utility-Sector Energy Efficiency Programs
- Lalonde, 1986, Evaluating the Econometric Evaluations of Training Programs, American Economic Review, 76, 604
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 2,708
Goals and Social Comparisons Promote Walking Behavior
Chapman, G. B., Colby, H., Convery, K. A., & Coups, E. J. (2015) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x15592156 · Cited by 30
“0001, and did not change systematically across days, F(11, 1458) = 1.”
BackgroundDistinguishing between green building occupants’ reasoned and unplanned behaviours
Hewitt, E., Andrews, C. J., Senick, J., Wener, R. E., Krogmann, U., & Allacci, M. S. (2015) · Building Research & Information · doi:10.1080/09613218.2015.1015854 · Cited by 30
“The work of Allcott (2011) highlights the success of mechanisms such as those used by OPower, which sends customers monthly bill inserts that compare household electricity consumption with that of nearby neighbours.”
BackgroundWell-Endowed Rating Systems: How Modified Defaults Can Lead to More Sustainable Performance
Shealy, T., & Klotz, L. E. (2015) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001009 · Cited by 29
“Then, searches for these same psychological processes in other fields led to literature in energy policy (Houde and Todd 2010), consumer behavior related to energy consumption (Allcott 2011; Ayres et al. 2012), and environmental psychology (Nolan et al.”
BackgroundNudging and pro-environmental behaviour
Nielsen, A. S. E., Sand, H., Sørensen, P., et al. (2017) · TemaNord · doi:10.6027/tn2016-553 · Cited by 30
Intervening to Change Social Norms: When Does It Work?
Prentice, D. A. (2018) · Social research · doi:10.1353/sor.2018.0007 · Cited by 30
Dimensions of donation preferences: the structure of peer and income effects
Drouvelis, M., & Marx, B. (2020) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-020-09661-z · Cited by 29
Energy performance certification and time on the market
Aydın, E., Bohórquez, S., & Brounen, D. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2019.102270 · Cited by 31
Spandagos, C., Baark, E., Ng, T. L., & Yarime, M. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110915 · Cited by 31
Climate change and carbon pricing: Overcoming three dimensions of failure
Stoll, C., & Mehling, M. (2021) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.102062 · Cited by 31
“Such selfless – or pro-social – behaviour can be observed in the intrinsic motivation to make unpaid contributions to society[68].”
BackgroundOnce Good, Always Good? Testing Nudge’s Spillovers on Pro Environmental Behavior
Clot, S., Giusta, M. D., & Jewell, S. L. (2021) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/00139165211060524 · Cited by 30
“…to encourage the adoption of more sustainable practices across a range of areas (recycling, energy saving, healthier food habits, organ donation), with mixed results (for a review of international evidence see Allcott, 2011; Al-Ubaydli & Lee, 2011; Southerton et al., 2011; Viscusi et al., 2011).”
BackgroundAssessing the impacts of social norms on low-carbon mobility options
Luis Mundaca, T., Collado, R. R., & Muñoz-Repiso, J. M. C. (2022) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112814 · Cited by 39
Yew, M. H., Molla, A., & Cooper, V. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131778 · Cited by 30
Cho, H., Chung, S., & Filippova, A. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.018 · Cited by 30
“…or prevalence of behavior pertaining to various topics, such as genetically engineered foods (Gunther & Christen, 2002), energy conservation (Allcott, 2011), high calorie snack food (Robinson, Harris, Thomas, Aveyard, & Higgs, 2013), crime (Shrum & Bischak, 2001), and the thin ideal (Park,…”
BackgroundEnvironmental Enforcement and Compliance: Lessons from Pollution, Safety, and Tax Settings
Alm, J. R., & Shimshack, J. P. (2014) · Foundations and Trends® in Microeconomics · doi:10.1561/0700000048 · Cited by 29
“See, for example, Allcott (2012).”
Heterogeneous Preferences and Investments in Energy Saving MeasuresPreprint
Fischbacher, U., Schudy, S., & Teyssier, S. (2015) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.5282/ubm/epub.24894 · Cited by 30
“Previous studies have shown that social norms impact households’ decisions in energy conservation (Allcott, 2011; Baddeley, 2011).”
BackgroundSocial Persuasion in Online and Physical Networks
Singh, V. K., Mani, A., & Pentland, A. (2014) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2014.2363986 · Cited by 29
“For example, in a study involving more that 80 000 households, Alcott [3] found that social comparison was an effective method for reducing the energy consumption of households.”
MethodA Study on the Effects of Multiple Goal Orientation on Learning Motivation and Learning Behaviors
Li, J. Y., & Shieh, C.-J. (2015) · Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education · doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1221a · Cited by 29
“The so-called goal orientation, as the standard of a learner evaluating the learning ability and achievement, refers to the purpose and reason of a learner engaging in learning (Allcott, 2011). For this reason, when being used for discussing learning motivation, goal orientation does not recognize a student with/witho…”
BackgroundThe effect of culture on energy efficient vehicle ownership
Filippini, M., & Wekhof, T. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102400 · Cited by 32
Digital Nudging for Online Social Sharing: Evidence from A Randomized Field Experiment
Huang, N., Chen, P., Hong, Y., & Wu, S.-Y. (2018) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2018.185 · Cited by 31
“Different from traditional nudging, which has been used to influence individual behaviors in a variety of offline scenarios such as organ donation [21], political voting [16], and energy saving [4], digital nudging mainly occurs in the online environment [30].”
BackgroundHomonoff, T. A., O’Brien, R., & Sussman, A. B. (2019) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00888 · Cited by 30
“Building on research demonstrating the effectiveness of messaging informing individuals of prosocial actions of their peers (Allcott, 2011; Ayres, Raseman, & Shih, 2013; Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004; Kast, Meier, & Pomeranz, 2012), the social influence condition (appendix figure 2b) included…”
Moser, C., Frick, V., Seidl, R., & Blumer, Y. (2019) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.016 · Cited by 30
“…on energy-saving behaviour has been demonstrated empirically in various 20 field experiments and described in literature reviews (Abrahamse, Steg, Vlek, & Rothengatter, 21 2005; Allcott, 2011; Schultz, Khazian, & Zaleski, 2008; Schultz, Nolan, Cialdini, Goldstein, & 22 Griskevicius, 2007).”
Nudging businesses to pay their taxes: Does timing matter?
Gillitzer, C., & Sinning, M. (2019) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2019.11.020 · Cited by 28
Wang, A., Lam, J. C. K., Song, S., et al. (2020) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.07.003 · Cited by 29
Wang, M., Gong, Y., Wang, S., Li, Y., & Sun, Y. (2021) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.101979 · Cited by 30
(IPCC), I. P. O. C. C. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009157926.003 · Cited by 46
Römer, B., Reichhart, P., & Picot, A. O. (2014) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-014-0167-5 · Cited by 29
“Additionally, Allcott (2011) uses data of a field experiment with 600,000 subjects to estimate that social norms influence energy consumption and may have an even bigger influence than price interventions.”
MethodReese, P. P., Kessler, J. B., Doshi, J. A., Friedman, J. Y., Mussell, A. S., Carney, C., Zhu, J., Wang, W., Troxel, A. B., Young, P., et al. (2015) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-015-3540-y · Cited by 30
“52 (P) Type 1 8 (4) 3 (6) 3 (6) 1 (2) 1 (2) Type 2 177 (89) 42 (86) 42 (84) 45 (92) 48 (96) Other/Unknown 13 (7) 4 (8) 5 (10) 3 (6) 1 (2) Missing 2 1 0 1 0 Highest level of education 0.”
Enhancing household energy consumption: How should it be done?
Camara, N., Xu, D., & Binyet, E. M. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.060 · Cited by 29
Murphy, D. M. A., Roobroeck, D., Lee, D. R., & Thies, J. E. (2020) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/ajae.12101 · Cited by 27
Fighting Climate Change: The Role of Norms, Preferences, and Moral ValuesPreprint
Falk, A., Andre, P., Boneva, T., & Chopra, F. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3885418 · Cited by 31
Behavioral interventions motivate action to address climate change
Sinclair, A. H., Cosme, D., Lydic, K. O., Reinero, D. A., Tartak, J. C., MANN, M. E., & Falk, E. B. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2426768122 · Cited by 43
Perino, G. (2015) · Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists · doi:10.1086/682572 · Cited by 28
“, 2012), energy savings (Allcott, 2011; Costa & Kahn, 2013), purchases of hybrid cars (Ozaki & Sevastyanova, 2011), grocery shopping (Perino et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialDecision-making governance for purchases of solar photovoltaic systems in Japan
Tanaka, K., Sekito, M., Managi, S., et al. (2017) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.012 · Cited by 28
Brown, Z. S. (2018) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/ajae/aay004 · Cited by 29
“Social comparisons have been shown to have small but measureable effects on promoting target behaviors, often at low cost (Allcott 2011; Ferraro and Price 2011; Brent, Cook, and Olsen 2015).”
Providing descriptive norms during engineering design can encourage more sustainable infrastructure
Shealy, T., Johnson, E. J., Weber, E. U., Klotz, L. E., Applegate, S., Ismael, D., & Bell, R. G. (2018) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2018.04.017 · Cited by 28
Behavioral barriers and the energy efficiency gap: a survey of the literature
Abrardi, L. (2018) · Journal of Industrial and Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s40812-018-0107-z · Cited by 28
“2005; Allcott 2011).”
BackgroundMi, L., Qiao, L., Gan, X., Xu, T., Lv, T., Qiao, Y., & Ding, C. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137533 · Cited by 28
Financial and symbolic incentives promote ‘green’ charging choices
Kacperski, C., & Kutzner, F. (2020) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2020.01.002 · Cited by 28
“…energy-savings (Morganti et al., 2017), informational or normative messages, which decreased energy usage by up to 6%, and reduced littering (Allcott, 2011; Cialdini, Reno, & Kallgren, 1990) and emotional incentives, for example a polar bear animation on a melting ice sheet, which reduced…”
Future orientation promotes climate concern and mitigation
Zhu, J., Hu, S., Wang, J., & Zheng, X. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121212 · Cited by 26
Caggiano, H., Kumar, P., Shwom, R., Cuite, C. L., & Axsen, J. (2021) · Energy Efficiency · doi:10.1007/s12053-021-09959-8 · Cited by 29
“Traditionally, EE policies and program interventions have mainly relied on technological upgrades and market instruments, largely overlooking the potential and importance of “non-price”-based human factors (Allcott, 2011).”
BackgroundPerspective-Taking to Reduce Affective Polarization on Social Media
Saveski, M., Gillani, N., Yuan, A., Vijayaraghavan, P., & Roy, D. (2022) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19343 · Cited by 28
“…effects are a foundational concept in behavioral science and have been successfully used to drive behavior change across a range of domains like marketing and advertising (Maheswaran and Meyers-Levy 1990), energy consumption (Allcott 2011), and education (Kizilcec et al. 2017), to name a few.”
BackgroundCaballero, N. D. L. P., & Ploner, M. (2022) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2022.102734 · Cited by 28
“Different types of nudges have been tested to promote energy conservation both in households [31] and workplaces [32].”
BackgroundZhang, C., Zha, D., Jiang, P., Wang, F., Yang, G., Salman, M., & Wu, Q. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122602 · Cited by 26
What is the Effect of Fuel Efficiency Information on Car Prices? Evidence from Switzerland
Alberini, A., Bareit, M., & Filippini, M. (2015) · The Energy Journal · doi:10.5547/01956574.37.3.aalb · Cited by 28
“…to different pieces of information about energy efficiency and savings on the energy bills (Newell and Siikamaki, 2013), and respond to social norms (Allcott, 2011), for example reducing their usage of electricity when they are told that they use more than their neighbors but increasing it…”
BackgroundUsing social norm to promote energy conservation in a public building
Liu, Y., Veríssimo, D., & Farhidi, F. (2016) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.09.041 · Cited by 28
Behavioral Anomalies and Energy-related Individual Choices: The Role of Status-quo Bias
Blasch, J., & Daminato, C. (2020) · The Energy Journal · doi:10.5547/01956574.41.6.jbla · Cited by 28
“Alternatively, providing households with social-comparison feedback (Allcott, 2011) could make individuals with a tendency to over-consume energy services aware that their use of appliances exceeds the average use of appliances in comparable households.”
Richard Thaler and the Rise of Behavioral Economics
Barberis, N. C. (2018) · Scandinavian Journal of Economics · doi:10.1111/sjoe.12313 · Cited by 36
“…the social-comparison technique has also been used to reduce energy consumption and to motivate participation in elections (Gerber and Rogers, 2009; Allcott, 2011), and something as simple as sending parents a text message about their children’s missed assignments can lead to improved performance…”
MethodIncentives, green preferences, and private provision of impure public goods
Wichman, C. J. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2016.06.003 · Cited by 28
Salience of Carbon Taxes in the Gasoline MarketPreprint
Rivers, N. J., & Schaufele, B. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2131468 · Cited by 28
“, Allcott (2011) and Bollinger and Gillingham (2012)) can be categorized as other‐regarding preferences.”
Nudging Participation and Spatial Agglomeration in Payment for Environmental Service SchemesPreprint
Kühfuss, L., Préget, R., Thoyer, S., de Vries, F. P., & Hanley, N. D. (2017) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 30
Schleich, J. E., & Alsheimer, S. (2024) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108151 · Cited by 34
Yu, B., Tian, Y., & Zhang, J. (2015) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2015.07.131 · Cited by 27
Switching on Electricity Demand Response: Evidence for German Households
Frondel, M., & Kussel, G. (2019) · The Energy Journal · doi:10.5547/01956574.40.5.mfro · Cited by 27
“In addition to non-price interventions, such as social norm comparisons, which have proved to be cost-effective in the U.S. (Allcott, 2011), we therefore propose fostering low-cost information measures to increase the price awareness of households, not least because providing price informa - tion has the potential to…”
Combining “carrot and stick” to incentivize sustainability in households
Mahmoodi, J., Prasanna, A., Hille, S. L., et al. (2018) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.037 · Cited by 27
Under Pressure! Nudging Electricity Consumption within Firms. Feedback from a Field Experiment
Charlier, C., Guérassimoff, G., Kirakozian, A., et al. (2020) · The Energy Journal · doi:10.5547/01956574.42.1.ccha · Cited by 27
“Allcott (2011), for example, showed that the effect of a social comparison nudge used by the company Opower in a very large randomized field experiment with households, was equiv - alent to a 11 to 20% short-run price increase.”
BackgroundBalarama, H., Islam, A., Kim, J. S., et al. (2020) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104937 · Cited by 27
“Examples of these field experiments include Allcott (2011), Ferraro et al.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialTesting behavioral interventions designed to improve on-time SNAP recertification
Lopoo, L. M., Heflin, C. M., & Boskovski, J. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral Public Administration · doi:10.30636/jbpa.32.183 · Cited by 27
“For instance, individuals who were told that their neighbors consumed less energy than they did reduced consumption more than those who were provided energy savings advice (Nolan, Schultz, Caldini, Goldstein, & Griskevicus, 2008; Allcott, 2011).”
BackgroundAn experimental test of fundraising appeals targeting donor and recipient benefits
List, J. A., Murphy, J. J., Price, M., & James, A. G. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01095-8 · Cited by 27
Conforming with peers in honesty and cooperation
İşler, O., & Gächter, S. (2022) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2021.12.026 · Cited by 28
Large but diminishing effects of climate action nudges under rising costs
Berger, S., Kilchenmann, A., Lenz, O., Ockenfels, A., Schlöder, F., & Wyss, A. M. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01379-7 · Cited by 27
Asiedu‐Ayeh, L. O., Zheng, X., Agbodah, K., et al. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14169977 · Cited by 27
“A similar method has been proven effective in encouraging consumers in various aspects [94].”
MethodThe mitigating effect of strategic behavior on the net benefits of a direct load control program
Lang, C., & Okwelum, E. (2015) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2015.01.025 · Cited by 27
“However, Allcott and Greenstone (2012) argue that the gap is likely very small, in the order of 1-2% of energy use.”
Makris, P., Efthymiopoulos, N., Nikolopoulos, V., et al. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2828323 · Cited by 27
“In particular, a utility’s portfolio can be categorized in several VECs based on qualitative characteristics such as demographics, geographical, socio-economic and other social norms-based metrics [27]–[29].”
Investing in Climate Change Adaptation: Motivations and Green Incentives in the Fiji Islands
Falco, S. D., & Sharma, S. (2018) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.08.015 · Cited by 29
Environmental policy when consumers value conformity
Ulph, A., & Ulph, D. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2018.09.001 · Cited by 28
“6 norms, including (a) observing members of a norm group consuming a product an individual has not experienced can give implicit information about the quality of that product; (b) in a related manner, giving people information about what similar people achieve in saving energy, or retirement savings can significantly…”
BackgroundInfluentialGennetian, L. A., Marti, M., Kennedy, J. L., Kim, J. H., & Duch, H. (2019) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2018.12.006 · Cited by 32
Berman, H., Shwom, R., & Cuite, C. L. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11185034 · Cited by 27
“…Info, T Info, Action yes (all treatment conditions) Allcott and Rodgers 2014 [63] E Info, T Info yes Effects initially steep but level off over time Allcott 2011 [62] E Info, T Info yes Bernstad 2014 [50] F Info, Material no (info), yes (material) Bernstad et al. 2013 [52] F Info no Boudet et al.…”
BackgroundHeat metering: socio-technical challenges in district-heated social housing
Morgenstern, P., Lowe, R., & Chiu, L. F. (2014) · Building Research & Information · doi:10.1080/09613218.2014.932639 · Cited by 27
“Since then, much research has looked at the role of occupants in household energy consumption (Gill, Tierney, Pegg, & Allan, 2011; Hiller, 2012; Steemers & Yun, 2009) and occupants have become a prime target of conservation efforts (Abrahamse, Steg, Vlek, & Rothengatter, 2005; Allcott, 2011).”
BackgroundThe Use of Descriptive Norms in Public Administration: A Panacea for Improving Citizen Behaviours?Preprint
John, P. C., Sanders, M., & Wang, J. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2514536 · Cited by 27
Bolton, G. E., Dimant, E., & Schmidt, U. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3294375 · Cited by 26
Green Nudges: Do They Work? Are They Ethical?Preprint
Schubert, C. R. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2729899 · Cited by 27
“In turn, it has informed the most highly ranked journal articles in the area of green nudging, to wit, Allcott (2011), Costa and Kahn (2013), and Allcott and Rogers (2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialIntergenerational transmission in regulated professions and the role of familism
Bamieh, O., & Cintolesi, A. (2021) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2021.10.036 · Cited by 26
Fang, X., Goette, L. F., Rockenbach, B., Sutter, M., Tiefenbeck, V., Schöb, S., & Staake, T. (2023) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2023.105028 · Cited by 26
Gulbinas, R., Jain, R. K., Taylor, J. E., Peschiera, G., & Golparvar‐Fard, M. (2013) · Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000319 · Cited by 26
Words speak louder: Conforming to preferences more than actions.
Tu, Y., & Fishbach, A. (2015) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000031 · Cited by 27
“…2015, Vol. 109, No. 2, 193–209 © 2015 American Psychological Association 0022-3514/15/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000031 193 mons, & Morales, 2010), environmental decisions (Allcott, 2011; Goldstein et al., 2008), and prosocial behaviors (Frey & Meier, 2004; Gerber & Rogers, 2009).”
InfluentialLim, T. C. (2017) · Journal of Environmental Planning and Management · doi:10.1080/09640568.2017.1350146 · Cited by 26
Nudging intrinsic motivation in environmental risk and social policy
Kácha, O., & Ruggeri, K. (2018) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2018.1459799 · Cited by 29
Perceived Social Consensus Can Reduce Ideological Biases on Climate Change
Goldberg, M. H., van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. W. (2019) · Apollo (University of Cambridge) · doi:10.17863/cam.37992 · Cited by 26
Appeals to Social Norms and Taxpayer Compliance
Alm, J. R., Schulze, W. D., von Bose, C., & Yan, J. (2019) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.1002/soej.12374 · Cited by 32
Lefèbvre, M., & Stenger, A. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227360 · Cited by 27
“Identifying which channel is the driver of change, if any, is a difficult task, and there are several reasons why an incentive program could have long-lasting effects such as the updating of information [11–12], the adoption of new habits [13], new social norms [14], etc.”
BackgroundDesigning Smart Energy Systems in an Industry 4.0 Paradigm towards Sustainable Environment
Morelli, G., Magazzino, C., Gurrieri, A. R., et al. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14063315 · Cited by 26
Experimental and behavioral economics to inform agri-environmental programs and policies
Palm‐Forster, L. H., & Messer, K. D. (2021) · Handbook of agricultural economics · doi:10.1016/bs.hesagr.2021.10.006 · Cited by 26
Rewiring the network. What helps an innovation to diffuse?
Sznajd-Weron, K., Szwabiński, J., Weron, R., & Weron, T. (2014) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2014/03/p03007 · Cited by 29
Targeting utility customers to improve energy savings from conservation and efficiency programs
Taylor, N. W., Jones, P. H., & Kipp, M. J. (2013) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.10.012 · Cited by 26
Price, M. (2014) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/grv002 · Cited by 26
Impact of household expenditures on CO2 emissions in China: Income-determined or lifestyle-driven?
Wang, Q., Liang, Q., Wang, B., et al. (2015) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-015-2067-1 · Cited by 26
“…exploring the influencing factors of household emissions, including economic and non-economic factors (Chitnis and Hunt 2011, 2012), social norms (Allcott 2011), increased energy efficiency (Brannlund et al. 2007), energy intensity, structure, activity and population (Das and Paul 2014), and…”
BackgroundLinnemayr, S., & Rice, T. (2016) · JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes · doi:10.1097/qai.0000000000000972 · Cited by 27
“In a series of programs across the United States, utility customers received letters comparing their energy consumption with that of their neighbors, which led to an electricity reduction of 2% or the equivalent of a price increase of 11%– 20%.(21) In the field of HIV, one of the authors is currently implementing an N…”
BackgroundKhosrowpour, A., Gulbinas, R., & Taylor, J. E. (2016) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.071 · Cited by 26
How Behavioral Economics and Nudges Could Help Diminish Irrationality in Suicide-Related Decisions
Bauer, B. W., & Capron, D. W. (2019) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691619866463 · Cited by 26
“…industry, including retirement savings (Carroll, Choi, Laibson, Madrian, & Metrick, 2009), college enrollment (Bettinger, Long, Oreopoulos, & Sanbonmatsu, 2012), energy conservation (Allcott, 2011), and influenza vaccinations (Milkman, Beshears, Choi, Laibson, & Madrian, 2011), among many others.”
No Man is an Island: Social Coordination and the Environment
Nyborg, K. (2019) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-020-00415-2 · Cited by 30
“…of Ostrom (1990) and her collaborators, environmental and resource economists have increasingly explored social interaction explicitly in their analyses (e.g., Rege 2004; Johansson-Stenman and Martinsson 2006; Allcott 2011; Dasgupta and Ehrlich 2013; Richter and Grasman 2013; Dasgupta et al.”
PREPAID ELECTRICITY PLAN AND ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR
Qiu, Y. L., Xing, B., & Wang, Y. D. (2016) · Contemporary Economic Policy · doi:10.1111/coep.12170 · Cited by 28
“For example, Allcott (2011b) finds that behavioral interventions of providing home energy reports compared to peers can save energy consumption by about 2%.”
Kimura, O., & Nishio, K. (2016) · Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy · doi:10.5547/2160-5890.5.1.okim · Cited by 26
What Roles for Energy Cooperatives in the Diffusion of Distributed Generation Technologies?Preprint
Bauwens, T. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2382596 · Cited by 26
“Consistently, the classical instruments used to take into account environmental externalities are Pigouvian taxes, emission trading schemes and subsidies for energy-efficient assets (Allcott, 2011).”
BackgroundThe effects of policy announcement, prices and subsidies on water consumption
Agarwal, S. D., Araral, E., Fan, M., Qin, Y., & Zheng, H. (2023) · Nature Water · doi:10.1038/s44221-023-00028-1 · Cited by 28
Behavioral interventions for waste reduction: a systematic review of experimental studies
Wilson, B. M., Delmas, M. A., & Rajagopal, D. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1561467 · Cited by 31
“Many of these studies tested variations of the seminal work by Schultz et al. (2007) and Allcott (2011) wherein households are given information about how their electricity or water usage compares to their neighbors’ usage.”
Community-based incentives for environmental protection: the case of green electricity
Jacobsen, G. D., Kotchen, M. J., & Clendenning, G. (2013) · Journal of Regulatory Economics · doi:10.1007/s11149-013-9213-z · Cited by 25
“Allcott (2011) and Ayres et al. (2009) show that social comparisons through home energy reports on utility bills can promote conservation.”
BackgroundBrandsma, J. S., & Blasch, J. (2019) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110992 · Cited by 25
Mol, J. M., Botzen, W. J. W., Blasch, J., Kranzler, E. C., & Kunreuther, H. C. (2020) · Behavioural Public Policy · doi:10.1017/bpp.2021.17 · Cited by 30
Impact of social comparison on preferences for Demand Side Management in Poland
Gołębiowska, B., Bartczak, A., & Budziński, W. (2021) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112024 · Cited by 22
Is less always more? Conservation, efficiency and water education programs
Wang, J., & Chermak, J. M. (2021) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106994 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Allcott, H.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Allcott, Hunt
- Venue
- Journal of Public Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 9-10
- Pages
- 1082-1095
- ISSN
- 0047-2727 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2139035425
- Cited by
- 2,802
- References
- 104
- Citations by year
- 2026: 225 · 2025: 209 · 2024: 194 · 2023: 208 · 2022: 226 · 2021: 257 · 2020: 225 · 2019: 240 · 2018: 199 · 2017: 171 · 2016: 165 · 2015: 161 · 2014: 147 · 2013: 94 · 2012: 55
- FWCI
- 263.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Public Economics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Keywords
- social norms, energy conservation, social comparison, residential electricity consumption, cost-effectiveness, injunctive norms, descriptive norms, treatment effect heterogeneity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review