The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.109.3.573 · Cited by 7,300
Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression.
Brant, R. (1990) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532457 · Cited by 1,864
A teacher like me: Does race, ethnicity, or gender matter?
Dee, T. S. (2005) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282805774670446 · Cited by 1,078
Stereotypes and standards of judgment.
Biernat, M., Manis, M., & Nelson, T. E. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.485 · Cited by 449
Evaluating students’ evaluations of professors
Braga, M., Paccagnella, M., & Pellizzari, M. (2014) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.04.002 · Cited by 387
An evaluation of course evaluations
Stark, P. B., & Freishtat, R. (2014) · ScienceOpen Research · doi:10.14293/s2199-1006.1.sor-edu.aofrqa.v1 · Cited by 220
Gender Inequality and Time Allocations Among Academic Faculty
Winslow, S. (2010) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243210386728 · Cited by 201
Cited by
Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations
Mengel, F., Sauermann, J., & Zölitz, U. (2019) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1093/jeea/jvx057 · Cited by 401
Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions
Llorens, A., Tzovara, A., Bellier, L., Bhaya-Grossman, I., Bidet-Caulet, A., Chang, W. K., Cross, Z. R., Dominguez-Faus, R., Flinker, A., Fonken, Y., et al. (2021) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.002 · Cited by 361
On students’ (mis)judgments of learning and teaching effectiveness.
Carpenter, S. K., Witherby, A. E., & Tauber, S. K. (2020) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.12.009 · Cited by 183
Okoye, K., Arrona-Palacios, A., Camacho-Zuñiga, C., Achem, J. A. G., Escamilla, J., & Hosseini, S. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10751-5 · Cited by 112
Follow My Lead: Assertive Cheap Talk and the Gender Gap
Manian, S., & Sheth, K. (2021) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2020.3837 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Boring, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Public Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 145
- Pages
- 27-41
- ISSN
- 0047-2727 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W997583356
- Cited by
- 492
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 123.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.11.006
- The paper
- Boring, A. (2017). Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching. Journal of Public Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.11.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
