Cited by 29Algal biology and biofuel productionLight effects on plantsMarine and coastal ecosystems

Time-dependent radiation characteristics of Nannochloropsis oculata during batch culture

Heng, Ri-Liang, Pilon, Laurent·2014·Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2014.04.008

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heng, R.-L., & Pilon, L.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Pilon, Laurent
Venue
Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
144
Pages
154-163
ISSN
0022-4073 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077320209
Cited by
29
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
Keywords
Nannochloropsis oculata, radiation characteristics, scattering cross section, absorption cross section, photobioreactors, microalgae, pigment content, nitrogen starvation, light transfer, biofuel production, Eustigmatophyceae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review