Cited by 100AI in Service InteractionsCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltySocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Consumer reactions to chatbot versus human service: an investigation in the role of outcome valence and perceived empathy

Markovitch, Dmitri G., Stough, Rusty A., Huang, Dongling·2024·Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103847

Cites

69 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human partners possess distinctive advantages in contextual understanding, commonsense reasoning, and emotional support, thereby enhancing the usefulness and practical value of collaborative outcomes.

    “by contrast, human partners possess distinctive advantages in contextual understanding, commonsense reasoning, and emotional support, thereby enhancing the usefulness and practical value of collaborative outcomes (Huang et al., 2024; Markovitch et al., 2024; Revilla et al., 2023).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Beck, 2023, Avoiding the dangers of generative AI, How marketers can use emotional intelligence to gain impact

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Markovitch, D. G., Stough, R. A., & Huang, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Maine (US)
  • California State University, Northridge (US)
Corresponding author
Stough, Rusty A.
Venue
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-07
Volume
79
Pages
103847
ISSN
0969-6989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4394630130
Cited by
100
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 57 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 5
FWCI
14.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
chatbots, perceived empathy, customer satisfaction, repatronage intention, recommendation acceptance, ChatGPT, medical advice, empathic communication, human-like appearance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review