Cited by 13Social Robot Interaction and HRIAI in Service InteractionsInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Co-experiencing with AI: effects on social bonding and empathy in human–AI relationships

Qian, Yiming, Wan, Xiaoang·2025·Technology in Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103009

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In studies on human-AI co-creation or comparisons between two co-creation types, the need to belong has rarely been directly investigated or has been treated only as a mediating variable.

    “However, in studies on human–AI co-creation or comparisons between two co-creation types, while many have examined social motivational factors such as trust (Daly et al., 2025), empathy (Zhu et al., 2025; Qian and Wan, 2025), reliance (Siemon et al., 2025) and commitment feeling (Wang et al., 2025), the need to belong, although a fundamental social motivation, has rarely been directly investigated”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 84 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qian, Y., & Wan, X.
Affiliations
Tsinghua University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wan, Xiaoang
Venue
Technology in Society
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-12
Volume
83
Pages
103009
ISSN
0160-791X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411894585
Cited by
12
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 3
FWCI
13.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Technology in Society (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (72372081)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
human-AI relationship, co-experience, social bonding, shared mental models, embodied robots, chatbots, human-AI symbiosis, collective experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review