Cited by 11Sustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchPasture and Agricultural Systems

Exploring the relationship between regenerative grazing and Ranchers’ wellbeing

Open access
Vivas, Jonathan, Hodbod, Jennifer·2024·Journal of Rural Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103267

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 76 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Heaney, 2017, Stanford WELL for life: learning what it means to Be well, Am. J. Health Promot., 31, 449

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vivas, J., & Hodbod, J.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Vivas, Jonathan
Venue
Journal of Rural Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-05
Volume
108
Pages
103267
ISSN
0743-0167 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4394955321
Cited by
11
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Rural Studies (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (2020-38640-31522)
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture
  • North Central SARE (LNC20-437, LS20-437)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Agriculture and Rural Development Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
Keywords
regenerative grazing, farmer well-being, social well-being, pasture-based beef production, relational well-being, eudaimonic well-being, systems thinking, farmer values, Michigan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review