Cited by 0Agriculture and Farm SafetyAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchOccupational Health and Burnout

Understanding stress factors in farming: A nationwide survey on occupational strain and mental health among Austrian farmers

Open access
Humer, Elke, Schaffler, Yvonne, Mracnay, Brigitte, Luttenberger, Katharina, Pieh, Christoph, Neubauer, Viktoria·2026·Journal of Rural Studies

Abstract

Situated at the intersection of ecological, economic, and social transformations, farmers operate within structurally embedded conditions with important implications for mental health. This study examines work-related stressors among Austrian farmers, exploring gender and age differences and their associations with mental health indicators, thereby addressing a gap in the European context. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 2006 Austrian farmers in autumn/winter 2024/2025. Participants rated 19 predefined work-related stressors and completed standardized instruments assessing depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), perceived stress (PSS-4), sleep disturbances (ISI-2), alcohol misuse (CAGE), and suicidality (SBQ-R). Qualitative data were collected via an open-ended question about further stressors. Bureaucracy/documentation was rated as the most burdensome stressor, followed by agricultural policy, price fluctuations, and high workload. Men reported higher stress from animal welfare activism, public pressure, and policy, whereas women reported higher stress from caregiving, physical labor, and generational conflicts. Younger farmers experienced more stress from financial concerns, workload, and generational conflicts than older farmers. While structural stressors, particularly those related to bureaucracy and agricultural policy, were perceived as most burdensome, stressors linked to resource depletion, such as financial strain, high workload, and social isolation, showed the strongest associations with impaired mental health. The findings highlight a distinction between perceived burden and psychological impact: stressors that threaten key resources within farmers’ livelihoods are more strongly associated with mental health outcomes than those experienced as administratively burdensome. This underscores the need for interventions that not only address structural conditions but also strengthen psychosocial resources within the socio-structural context of rural life. • Bureaucracy is the top stressor for farmers. • Mental health in farmers links to finances and isolation. • Men stress more over public pressure; women over caregiving and physical labor. • Younger farmers experience more stress from finances and workload.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104163

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Humer, E., Schaffler, Y., Mracnay, B., Luttenberger, K., Pieh, C., & Neubauer, V.
Affiliations
  • Universität für Weiterbildung Krems (AT)
  • University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Humer, Elke
Venue
Journal of Rural Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-05
Volume
124
Pages
104163
ISSN
0743-0167 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7151540407
Cited by
0
References
35
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Rural Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture and Farm Safety
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Agriculture and Rural Development Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
farmer mental health, occupational stress, occupational stressors, agricultural policy, financial stress, workload, social isolation, gender differences, age differences, depression, anxiety, sleep disorders, alcohol abuse, suicidality, caregiving, intergenerational conflict

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review