Cited by 80Physical Activity and HealthBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Are Active Australia physical activity questions valid for older adults?

Open access
Heesch, Kristiann C., Hill, Robert L., van Uffelen, Jannique G.Z., Brown, Wendy J.·2011·Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

Abstract

Objective The Active Australia Survey (AAS) is used for physical activity (PA) surveillance in the general Australian adult population, but its validity in older adults has not been evaluated. Our aim was to examine the convergent validity of the AAS questions in older adults.Design The AAS was validated against pedometer step counts as an objective measure of PA, self-reported physical function, and a step-test to assess cardiorespiratory fitness.Method Participants were community-dwelling adults, aged 65-89 y, with the ability to walk 100 m. They completed a self-administered AAS and the step-test in one interview. One week earlier, they completed the Short Form-36 physical function subscale. Between these two interviews, they each wore a YAMAX Digiwalker SW200 pedometer and recorded daily steps. Using the AAS data, daily walking minutes and total PA minutes (walking, moderate-intensity PA and vigorous-intensity PA) were compared with the validity measures using Spearman rank-order correlations. Fifty-three adults completed the study.Results Median daily walking minutes were 34.2 (interquartile range [IQR] 17.1, 60.0), and median daily total PA minutes were 68.6 (IQR 31.4, 113.6). Walking and total PA minutes were both moderately correlated with pedometer steps (Spearman correlation r=0.42, p=0.003, for each) but not with step-test seconds to completion (r=-0.11, p=0.44; r=-0.25, p=0.08, respectively). Total PA minutes were significantly correlated with physical function scores (r=0.39, p=0.004), but walking minutes were not (r=0.15, p=0.29).Conclusions This initial examination of the psychometric properties of the AAS for older adults suggests that this surveillance tool has acceptable convergent validity for ambulatory, community-dwelling older adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsams.2010.11.004

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heesch, K. C., Hill, R. L., van Uffelen, J. G. Z., & Brown, W. J.
Affiliations
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Heesch, Kristiann C.
Venue
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
233-237
ISSN
1440-2440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114941426
Cited by
80
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of science and medicine in sport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
  • Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Funders
  • University of Queensland
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (301200)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
physical activity measurement, older adults, convergent validity, pedometer step counts, cardiorespiratory fitness, physical function, self-reported physical activity, community-dwelling older adults, physical activity surveillance
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Australia, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Motor Activity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Assessment, Geriatric Assessment, Walking, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review