Cited by 178Physical Activity and HealthStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyNutritional Studies and Diet

Assessment of physical activity and energy expenditure in epidemiological research of chronic diseases

Lagerros, Ylva Trolle, Lagiou, Pagona·2007·European Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Physical inactivity has emerged as an important risk factor for a number of diseases, but the typically crude exposure assessments in epidemiological studies, with entailing variation in measurement accuracy, may be a source of heterogeneity contributing to inconsistent results among studies. Consequently, the choice of method for the assessment of physical activity in epidemiological studies is important. Good methods increase our chances of avoiding misclassification and may enhance our understanding of the association between physical activity and health. Since physical activity is also a potential confounder of other lifestyle-health relationships, good methods may enhance our ability to control for confounding. But despite a steadily increasing selection of methods to choose from, no method is suitable for every situation and every population. Although the questionnaire is the most widely used method in epidemiological studies, and laboratory methods are mainly used for validation purposes, improved technology may change our ways of assessing physical activity in the future. This paper describes different methods to measure physical activity and energy expenditure from the epidemiological perspective, and attempts to address the concepts related to the measurement of physical activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10654-007-9154-x

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 85 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lagerros, Y. T., & Lagiou, P.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Lagerros, Ylva Trolle
Venue
European Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2007-06
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
353-362
ISSN
  • 0393-2990 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7284
OpenAlex
W2025365257
Cited by
178
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 27
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
physical activity measurement, energy expenditure, physical inactivity, chronic disease risk factors, measurement accuracy, misclassification, confounding, questionnaire method, laboratory measurements
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Data Collection, Energy Metabolism, Humans, Physical Fitness, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Design, Reproducibility of Results, Exercise, Epidemiologic Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review