Cited by 296Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPhysical Activity and HealthCognitive Functions and Memory

The effects of exercise on cognition in older adults with and without cognitive decline: a systematic review.

Open access
Uffelen, Jannique G Z van, Chin A Paw, Marijke J M, Hopman-Rock, Marijke, Mechelen, Willem van·2008·Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the effect of physical exercise on cognition in older adults with and without cognitive decline. DATA SOURCES: : Randomized controlled trials were identified by literature searches in PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, and AgeLine. STUDY SELECTION: Papers were included on the basis of predefined inclusion criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: Data on study population, exercise intervention, and effectiveness were extracted. Two independent reviewers assessed methodological quality. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-three studies were included-15 among cognitively healthy subjects and 8 among subjects with cognitive decline. Seven studies were qualified as high-quality studies, 2 in cognitively healthy subjects and 5 in subjects with cognitive decline. In cognitively healthy subjects, significant beneficial intervention effects were observed in 5 studies on information processing, executive function, or memory. Interventions in these studies included aerobic exercise only (n = 2); strength exercise (n = 1); strength and balance exercise (n = 1); or all-round exercise including aerobic, strength, balance and flexibility training (n = 1). In subjects with cognitive decline, 5 studies observed beneficial effects on general cognition, executive functions, and memory. Interventions included aerobic (n = 3) or strength exercise combined with flexibility or balance exercise (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: Beneficial effects of various exercise programs on aspects of cognition have been observed in studies among subjects with and without cognitive decline. The majority of the studies, however, did not find any effect. The small number of included studies; lack of high-quality studies; and the large variability in study populations, exercise protocols, and outcome measures complicate interpretation of the results. More high-quality trials are needed to assess the effects of different types of exercise on cognitive function in older adults with and without cognitive decline.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jsm.0b013e3181845f0b

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Heyn P, Abreu BC, Ottenbacher KJ. The effects of exercise training on elderly persons with cognitive impairment and dementia: A meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004 October;85(10):1694-704.
  2. Penrose FK. Can exercise affect cognitive functioning in Alzheimer's disease? A review of the literature. Activities, Adaptation & Aging 2005;29(4):15-40.
  3. Lezak MD. Neuropsychological assessment. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uffelen, J. G. Z. V., Chin A Paw, M. J. M., Hopman-Rock, M., & Mechelen, W. V.
Affiliations
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Hopman-Rock, Marijke
Venue
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine
Published
2008-11
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
486-500
ISSN
1050-642X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064404113
Cited by
296
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 18
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Repository hosted by TU Delft Library (TU Delft) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
physical activity, cognitive function, older adults, cognitive decline, aerobic exercise, resistance training, balance training, flexibility training, executive function, memory, information processing
MeSH terms
Aging, Cognition, Humans, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review