Cited by 80Sports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutritionThermoregulation and physiological responses

Influence of carbohydrate supplementation on skill performance during a soccer match simulation

Open access
Russell, Mark, Benton, David, Kingsley, Michael·2012·Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

Abstract

Objectives This study investigated the influence of carbohydrate supplementation on skill performance throughout exercise that replicates soccer match-play.Design Experimentation was conducted in a randomised, double-blind and cross-over study design.Methods After familiarization, 15 professional academy soccer players completed a soccer match simulation incorporating passing, dribbling and shooting on two separate occasions. Participants received a 6% carbohydrate-electrolyte solution (CHO) or electrolyte solution (PL). Precision, success rate, ball speed and an overall index (speed-precision-success; SPS) were determined for all skills. Blood samples were taken at rest, immediately before exercise, every 15 min during exercise (first half: 15, 30 and 45 min; second half: 60, 75 and 90 min), and 10 min into the half time (half-time).Results Carbohydrate supplementation influenced shooting (time×treatment interaction: p<0.05), where CHO attenuated the decline in shot speed and SPS index. Supplementation did not affect passing or dribbling. Blood glucose responses to exercise were influenced by supplementation (time×treatment interaction: p<0.05), where concentrations were higher at 45 min and during half-time in CHO compared with PL. Blood glucose concentrations reduced by 30±1% between half-time and 60 min in CHO.Conclusions Carbohydrate supplementation attenuated decrements in shooting performance during simulated soccer match-play; however, further research is warranted to optimise carbohydrate supplementation regimes for high-intensity intermittent sports.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.12.006

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Russell, M., Benton, D., & Kingsley, M.
Affiliations
  • Moulton College (GB)
  • Swansea University (GB)
Venue
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
348-354
ISSN
1440-2440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043880619
Cited by
80
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of science and medicine in sport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Acquire (CQUniversity) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Keywords
carbohydrate supplementation, soccer, match simulation, skill performance, shooting performance, passing, dribbling, blood glucose, carbohydrate-electrolyte solution, intermittent exercise
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Blood Glucose, Dietary Carbohydrates, Double-Blind Method, Electrolytes, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Psychomotor Performance, Soccer, Cross-Over Studies, Dietary Supplements, Athletic Performance, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review