Cited by 48Sports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutritionExercise and Physiological Responses

A comparison of isomaltulose versus maltodextrin ingestion during soccer-specific exercise

Open access
Stevenson, Emma J., Watson, Anthony, Theis, Stephan, Holz, Anja, Harper, Liam D., Russell, Mark·2017·European Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: The performance and physiological effects of isomaltulose and maltodextrin consumed intermittently during prolonged soccer-specific exercise were investigated. METHODS: ) containing maltodextrin (Glycaemic Index: 90-100), isomaltulose (Glycaemic Index: 32) or a carbohydrate-energy-free placebo in a manner replicating the practices of soccer players (i.e., during warm-up and half-time). Physical (sprinting, jumping) and technical (shooting, dribbling) performance was assessed. RESULTS: Blood glucose and plasma insulin (both P < 0.001) concentrations varied by trial with isomaltulose maintaining > 13% higher blood glucose concentrations between 75 and 90 min versus maltodextrin (P < 0.05). A decline in glycaemia at 60 min in maltodextrin was attenuated with isomaltulose (-19 versus -4%; P = 0.015). Carbohydrates attenuated elevations in plasma epinephrine concentrations (P < 0.05), but isomaltulose proved most effective at 90 and 120 min. Carbohydrates did not attenuate IL-6 increases or reductions in physical or technical performances (all P > 0.05). Ratings of abdominal discomfort were influenced by trial (P < 0.05) with lower values for both carbohydrates compared to PLA from 60 min onwards. CONCLUSIONS: ) did not attenuate performance reductions throughout prolonged soccer-specific exercise, isomaltulose maintained higher blood glucose at 75-90 min, lessened the magnitude of the exercise-induced rebound glycaemic response and attenuated epinephrine increases whilst maintaining similar abdominal discomfort values relative to maltodextrin. When limited opportunities exist to consume carbohydrates on competition-day, low-glycaemic isomaltulose may offer an alternative nutritional strategy for exercising soccer players.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00421-017-3719-5

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After a soccer match simulation between male college soccer players, consumption of an 8% isomaltulose drink attenuated the decline in blood glucose concentration at 60 min in comparison to maltodextrin (−4% versus −19%, p = 0.015).

    “In addition, after a soccer match simulation between male college soccer players, Stevenson et al. (2017) reported that the consumption of an 8% isomaltulose drink (0.36 mL kg−1 body mass at warm-up and 0.48 g kg−1 body mass at half-time) attenuated the decline in blood glucose concentration at 60 min in comparison to maltodextrin (−4% versus −19%, p = 0.015).”
  • Ingestion of isomaltulose beverages (8-10% w/v) may serve as an additional nutritional strategy for team sports players (e.g., soccer) when limited in-play feeding opportunities exist during prolonged high-intensity intermittent exercise.

    “Thus, the ingestion of isomaltulose beverages (8–10% w/v) may serve as an additional nutritional strategy for team sports players (e.g., soccer) when limited in-play feeding opportunities exist during prolonged high-intensity intermittent exercise [52].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stevenson, E. J., Watson, A., Theis, S., Holz, A., Harper, L. D., & Russell, M.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • University of Huddersfield (GB)
  • Leeds Trinity University (GB)
Corresponding author
Russell, Mark
Venue
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2017-09-19
Volume
117
Issue
11
Pages
2321-2333
ISSN
  • 0020-9376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-6319
  • 1439-6327
OpenAlex
W2754556037
Cited by
48
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion)
  • Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Funders
BENEO-Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
isomaltulose, maltodextrin, carbohydrate intake, blood glucose, plasma insulin, epinephrine, interleukin-6, abdominal discomfort, exercise performance, soccer players
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Blood Glucose, Drug Administration Schedule, Epinephrine, Humans, Insulin, Isomaltose, Male, Polysaccharides, Soccer, Exercise, Interleukin-6, Athletic Performance, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review