Cited by 78Sports Performance and TrainingSport Psychology and PerformanceExercise and Physiological Responses

Influence of Exercise on Skill Proficiency in Soccer

Open access
Russell, Mark, Kingsley, Michael·2011·Sports Medicine

Abstract

The ability to maintain technical performances (i.e. skills) throughout soccer match-play is considered to be crucial in determining the outcome of competitive fixtures. Consequently, coaches dedicate a large proportion of time to practicing isolated skills, such as passing, shooting and dribbling. Unlike other elements that contribute to team-sport performances, it is unusual for coaches to use methods other than observations to assess changes resulting from technical training. Researchers have employed various tests to measure isolated soccer skills; however, reliance on outcome measures that include number of contacts (ball juggling tasks), time (dribbling tasks) and points scored (criterion-based passing and shooting tests) means that the outcomes are difficult for coaches to interpret. Skill tests that use video-analysis techniques to measure ball speed, precision and success of soccer skills offer valid and reliable alternatives. Although equivocal results are published, skill performances can be affected by assorted factors that threaten homeostasis, including match-related fatigue, dehydration and reductions in blood glucose concentrations. While acknowledging methodological constraints associated with using skill tests with limited ecological validity and cognitive demands, the effects of these homeostatic disturbances might vary according to the type of skill being performed. Shooting performances appear most susceptible to deterioration after exercise. Strategies such as aerobic training, fluid-electrolyte provision and acute carbohydrate supplementation have been found to improve proficiency in technical actions performed after soccer-specific exercise. However, mechanisms that cause deterioration in skill during soccer-specific exercise remain to be fully elucidated and strategies to optimize technical performance throughout match-play are warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2165/11589130-000000000-00000

Cites

109 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Russell, M., & Kingsley, M.
Affiliations
Swansea University (GB)
Corresponding author
Kingsley, Michael
Venue
Sports Medicine
Published
2011-07
Volume
41
Issue
7
Pages
523-539
ISSN
0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994832587
Cited by
78
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
soccer, technical skills, skill proficiency, physical activity, match fatigue, dehydration, blood glucose, video analysis, skill tests, shooting performance, passing, dribbling, carbohydrate supplementation, aerobic exercise, homeostasis
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Exercise Test, Humans, Motor Skills, Physical Fitness, Soccer, Exercise, Athletic Performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review