Cited by 30Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealth Policy Implementation ScienceOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Is exposure to an effective contingency management intervention associated with more positive provider beliefs?

Open access
Kirby, Kimberly C., Carpenedo, Carolyn M., Stitzer, Maxine L., Dugosh, Karen L., Petry, Nancy M., Roll, John M., Saladin, Michael E., Cohen, Allan J. +5 more·2012·Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Abstract

This study empirically examined opinions of treatment providers regarding contingency management (CM) programs while controlling for experience with a specific efficacious CM program. In addition to empirically describing provider opinions, we examined whether the opinions of providers at the sites that implemented the CM program were more positive than those of matched providers at sites that did not implement it. Participants from 7 CM treatment sites (n = 76) and 7 matched nonparticipating sites (n = 69) within the same nodes of the National Institute of Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network completed the Provider Survey of Incentives (PSI), which assesses positive and negative beliefs about incentive programs. An intent-to-treat analysis found no differences in the PSI summary scores of providers in CM program versus matched sites, but correcting for experience with tangible incentives showed significant differences, with providers from CM sites reporting more positive opinions than those from matched sites. Some differences were found in opinions regarding costs of incentives, and these generally indicated that participants from CM sites were more likely to see the costs as worthwhile. The results from the study suggest that exposing community treatment providers to incentive programs may itself be an effective strategy in prompting the dissemination of CM interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.09.004

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In December 2020, the Office of Inspector General clarified that contingency management is not inherently a violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute and can be assessed case by case.

    “In December 2020, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) published clarification-known as the”

    From The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [53]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) discusses contingency management’s effectiveness and providers’ reluctance to adopt it, while the Methods (page unavailable) describes tangible incentives. Searches for the Office of Inspector General, the Anti-Kickback Statute, December 2020, and case-by-case legal guidance found no passage addressing the claimed clarification. This 2012 paper cannot document an announcement made in 2020. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Diggle PJ Heagerty PJ Liang K-Y Zeger SL Analysis of Longitudinal Data (2nd Edition), Oxford Statistical Science Series #25 2002 Oxford University Press Inc. New York
  2. Griffiths RR Bigelow GE Henningfield JE Mello NK Similarities in animal and human drug taking behavior. Advances in Substance Abuse: Behavioral and Biological Research 1980 JAI Press Greenwich, CT

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kirby, K. C., Carpenedo, C. M., Stitzer, M. L., Dugosh, K. L., Petry, N. M., Roll, J. M., Saladin, M. E., Cohen, A. J., Hamilton, J., Reese, K., Sillo, G. R., Stabile, P. Q., & Sterling, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Treatment Research Institute (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Washington State University Spokane (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • Patton State Hospital (US)
  • Thomas Jefferson University (US)
Corresponding author
Kirby, Kimberly C.
Venue
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
356-365
ISSN
0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031444956
Cited by
30
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u10da013034-15, 5u10da013043-15)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (P60AA003510)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (U10-DA-013043, U10DA13043, U10-DA013034, R01DA015991, U10 DA13034, P50DA027841)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
contingency management, provider beliefs, incentive mechanisms, intervention dissemination, perceived cost, addiction treatment
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Costs and Cost Analysis, Counseling, Data Collection, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Educational Status, Health Personnel, Humans, Motivation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Substance Abuse Treatment Centers, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review