Cited by 50Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Counselor Attitudes toward the Use of Motivational Incentives in Addiction Treatment

Open access
Ducharme, Lori J., Knudsen, Hannah K., Abraham, Amanda J., Roman, Paul M.·2010·The American Journal on Addictions

Abstract

Counselor attitudes toward evidence‐based practices, such as motivational incentives/contingency management (MI/CM), are important in bridging the gap between research and practice. Mailed surveys from 1,959 substance abuse treatment counselors showed ambivalence toward MI/CM and strong disagreement with using monetary rewards for achievement of treatment goals. Attitudes were associated with counselors’ educational attainment, a 12‐step treatment ideology, affiliation with NIDA's Clinical Trials Network, and working in opioid treatment programs. Exposure to MI/CM via training was more strongly associated with attitudes when counselors worked in programs that had adopted MI/CM. While there is substantial resistance to MI/CM, dissemination and training about the essential elements of MI/CM may enhance counselors’ receptivity toward this intervention. (Am J Addict 2010;00:1–8)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2010.00081.x

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinicians and other staff may initially resist contingency management because they mistakenly believe it rewards substance use and is inappropriate.

    “Clinicians and other staff may initially resist adopting CM due to misconceptions that CM is rewarding people for substance use and, thus, inappropriate.48,54”

    From The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says counselors’ attitudes toward CM can be negative and uninformed, and the Discussion (page unavailable) reports negative reactions to tangible prizes for abstinence. The paper does not report that clinicians or other staff resist CM because they believe it rewards substance use or is therefore inappropriate. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]Institute of Medicine Improving the Quality of Health Care for Mental and Substance-Use Disorders: Quality Chasm Series 2006 National Academy Press Washington, DC 20669433

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ducharme, L. J., Knudsen, H. K., Abraham, A. J., & Roman, P. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
Venue
The American Journal on Addictions
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-09-21
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
496-503
ISSN
  • 1055-0496 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0391
OpenAlex
W1558147791
Cited by
50
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal on Addictions (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01da014482-10)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01-DA-014482, R21DA020028)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
motivational incentives, contingency management, counselor attitudes, addiction treatment, evidence-based practice adoption, monetary rewards, 12-step programs, opioid treatment programs, intervention dissemination
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Behavior Therapy, Counseling, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Reward, United States, Substance Abuse Treatment Centers, Health Care Surveys, Substance-Related Disorders, National Institute on Drug Abuse (U.S.), Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review