Cited by 66Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsEmergency and Acute Care Studies

A Systematic Review on the Effectiveness of Brief Interventions for Alcohol Misuse among Adults in Emergency Departments

Open access
Landy, Meredith S.H., Davey, Caitlin J., Quintero, David, Pecora, Amanda, McShane, Kelly E.·2016·Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Abstract

Given the frequency with which individuals seek treatment for alcohol-related consequences in emergency departments (EDs), they may be the optimal setting to deliver brief interventions (BIs) for alcohol misuse. Studies examining the effectiveness of BIs for alcohol misuse conducted in EDs have yielded mixed results, and new articles have been published since the last review in 2008. The aim of this study was to provide an updated systematic review on the effectiveness of BIs for alcohol misuse delivered to adults in EDs. Articles published in June 2014 and earlier were identified from online databases (PsycInfo, Healthstar, CINAHL, Medline, Nursing and Allied Health). Search terms included (1) alcohol, (2) "alcohol screening", "brief intervention", "brief alcohol intervention" or feedback and (3) "emergency department" or "emergency room". Once duplicates were removed, 171 abstracts were identified for review. Thirty-four studies were included in the systematic review. All studies reported a significant reduction in alcohol consumption at 3 months post-BI, with some studies finding significant differences between the BI and control groups, and other studies finding significant decreases in both conditions but no between-groups differences. The majority of studies did not find significant between-group differences at 6 and 12 months post-BI with regard to decreases in alcohol consumption. Individuals who received a BI were significantly less likely to have an alcohol-related injury at 6 or 12 months post-BI than individuals who did not receive a BI. BIs are unlikely to reduce subsequent hospitalizations however, they may be effective in reducing risky driving and motor vehicle crashes associated with alcohol use, which can result in hospitalization. Beyond the effects generated by visiting EDs, BIs delivered in EDs may not be effective in reducing alcohol consumption, or in reducing subsequent hospitalizations. BIs may be effective in reducing some alcohol-related consequences. Future studies ought to investigate for whom BIs are most effective, and the processes that lead to decreases in alcohol consumption and alcohol-related consequences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.08.004

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reduction of alcohol use regardless of treatment allocation is observed in other alcohol intervention trials, especially in emergency care settings, due to contextual factors such as trauma exposure or the acute care experience.

    “This is observed in other alcohol intervention trials, especially those conducted in emergency care settings, due to contextual factors such as trauma exposure or the acute care experience [15,27,37,41–43].”

    From Effectiveness of a brief intervention and text-based booster in the emergency department to reduce harmful and hazardous alcohol use: A pragmatic randomized adaptive clinical trial in Moshi, Tanzania (2025) · cites this paper as [27]

    Section 3.1.1 reports significant reductions in alcohol consumption in both intervention and control groups in several emergency-department trials. The Discussion proposes that an ED visit following alcohol-related consequences may itself prompt reduced drinking, but says its effect cannot be disentangled from the intervention. The source does not establish this explanation as the cause or specifically identify trauma exposure as a cause. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. *Academic ED SBIRT Research Collaborative (2007). The impact of screening, brief inter- vention, and referral for treatment on emergency department patients' alcohol use. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 50, 699-710. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annergmed. 2007.06.486. · DOI
  2. Aseltine, R. H., Jr. (2010). Screening, brief intervention and referral for treatment in emergency department patients' alcohol use: A 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 45, 514-519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agq058. · DOI
  3. Babor, T. F., McRee, B. G., Kassebaum, P. A., Grimaldi, P. L., Ahmed, K., & Bray, J. (2007). Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT): Toward a public health approach to the management of substance abuse. Substance Abuse, 28, 7-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J465v28n03_03. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Budinger, J. (2008). The effect of computerized tailored brief advice on at-risk drinking in subcritically injured trauma patients. Journal of Trauma Nursing, 15, 158-159.
  5. Daeppen, J. B., Bertholet, N., & Gaume, J. (2010). What process research tells us about brief intervention efficacy. Drug and Alcohol Review, 29, 612-616. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00235.x. · DOI
  6. Daeppen, J. B., Bertholet, N., Gmel, G., & Gaume, J. (2007). Communication during brief intervention, intention to change, and outcome. Substance Abuse, 28, 43-51. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1300/J465v28n03_05. · DOI
  7. Daeppen, J. B., Gaume, J., Bady, P., Yersin, B., Calmes, J. M., Givel, J. C., & Gmel, G. (2007). Brief alcohol intervention and alcohol assessment do not influence alcohol use in in- jured patients treated in the emergency department: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Addiction, 102, 1224-1233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007. 01869.x. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Dauer, A. R., Rubio, E. S., Coris, M. E., & Valls, J. M. (2006). Brief intervention in alcohol- positive traffic casualties: Is it worth it? Alcohol & Alcoholism, 41, 76-83. http://dx. doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agh241. · DOI
  9. Davey, C. J., Landy, M. S. H., Pecora, A., Quintero, D., & McShane, K. E. (2015). A realist re- view of brief interventions for alcohol misuse in emergency departments. Systematic Reviews, 4, 45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0024-4. · DOI
  10. Desy, P., Howard, P. K., Perhats, C., & Li, S. (2010). Alcohol screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment conducted by emergency nurses: An impact evaluation. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 36, 538-545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2009.09. 011. · DOI
  11. Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London, England: SAGE.
  12. Finney, J. W. (2008). Regression to the mean in substance use disorder treatment re- search. Addiction, 103(1), 42-52.
  13. Foote, J., DeLuca, A., Magura, S., Warner, A., Grand, A., Rosenblum, A., & Stahl, S. (1999). A group motivational treatment for chemical dependency. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 17, 181-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0740-5472(99)00003-3. · DOI
  14. Gentilello, L., Rivara, F., Donovan, D., Jurkovich, G., Daranciang, E., Dunn, C., ... Ries, R. (1999). Alcohol interventions in a trauma center as a means of reducing the risk of injury recurrence. Annals of Surgery, 230, 473-483.
  15. Graham, K., Bernards, S., Knibbe, R., Kairouz, S., Kuntsche, S., Wilsnack, S. C., ... Gmel, G. (2011). Alcohol-related negative consequences among drinkers around the world. Addiction, 106, 1391-1405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03425.x. · DOI
  16. Havard, A., Shakeshaft, A., Conigrave, K., & Doran, C. (2012). Randomized controlled trial of mailed personalized feedback for problem drinkers in the emergency department: The short-term impact. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 36, 523-531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01632.x. · DOI
  17. Hides, L., Kavanagh, D. J., Daglish, M., Cotton, S., Connor, J. P., Barendregt, J. J., ... Mergard, L. (2014). The Quik Fix study: A randomised controlled trial of brief interventions for young people with alcohol-related injuries and illnesses accessing emergency depart- ment and crisis support care. BMC Emergency Medicine, 14, 19-29. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1186/1471-227X-14-19. · DOI
  18. Kazdin, A. E. (2003). Research design in clinical psychology (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  19. Korcha, R., Cherpitel, C., Moskalewicz, J., Swiatkiewicz, G., Bond, J., & Ye, Y. (2012). Read- iness to change, drinking, and negative consequences among polish SBIRT patients. Addictive Behaviors, 37, 287-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.11.006. · DOI
  20. Kunz, M., French, M., & Bazargan-Hejazi, S. (2004). Cost-effectiveness analysis of a brief intervention delivered to problem drinkers presenting at an inner-city hospital emer- gency department. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 65, 363-370.
  21. Longabaugh, R., Woolard, R. F., Nirenberg, T. D., Minugh, A. P., Becker, B., Clifford, P. R., ... Gogineni, A. (2001). Evaluating the effects of a brief motivational intervention for in- jured drinkers in the emergency department. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62, 806-816 (Retrieved January 25, 2015 from http://ezproxy.lib.ryerson.ca/login? url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/619718365?accountid=13631).
  22. Miller, W. R., & Sanchez, V. C. (1994). Motivating young adults for treatment and lifestyle change. In G. Howard (Ed.), Issues in alcohol use and misuse by young adults (pp. 55-82). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
  23. Monti, P., Colby, S., Barnett, N., Spirito, A., Rohsenow, D., Myers, M., et al. (1999). Brief intervention for harm reduction with alcohol-positive older adolescents in a hospital emergency department. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 989-994.
  24. Neumann, T., Neuner, B., Weiss-Gerlach, E., Tonnesen, H., Gentilello, L., Wernecke, K., ... Spies, C. D. (2006). The effect of computerized tailored brief advice on at-risk drinking in subcritically injured trauma patients. Journal of Trauma, 61, 805-814. http://dx.doi. org/10.1097/01.ta.0000196399.2989.3.52. Newton, A. S., Dong, K., Mabood, N., Ata, N., Ali, S., Gokiert, R., ... Wild, T. C. (2013). Brief emergency department interventions for youth who use alcohol and other drugs. Pediatric Emergency Care, 29, 673-684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PEC. 0b013e31828ed325. · DOI
  25. Nilsen, P., Baird, J., Mello, M. J., Nirenberg, T., Woolard, R., Bendtsen, P., & Longabaugh, R. (2008). A systematic review of emergency care brief interventions for injury patients. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 35, 184-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2007.09.008. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Nordqvist, C., Wilhelm, E., Lindqvist, K., & Bendtsen, P. (2005). Can screening and simple written advice reduce excessive alcohol consumption among emergency care pa- tients? Alcohol and Alcoholism, 40, 401-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agh175. · DOI
  27. Prates, M. O., Aseltine, R. H., Jr., Dey, D. K., & Yan, J. (2013). Assessing intervention efficacy of high-risk drinkers using generalized linear mixed models with a new class of link functions. Biometrical Journal, 55, 912-924. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bimj. 201300015. · DOI
  28. Reinhardt, S., Bischof, G., Grothues, J., John, U., Meyer, C., & Rumpf, H. J. (2008). Gender differ- ences in the efficacy of brief interventions with a stepped care approach with alcohol- related disorders. Alcohol, 43(3), 334-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agn004. · DOI
  29. Roudsari, B., Caetano, R., Frankowski, R., & Field, C. (2009). Do minority or white patients re- spond to brief alcohol intervention in trauma centers? A randomized trial. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 54, 285-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.01.033. · DOI
  30. Saitz, R., Svikis, D., D'Onofrio, G., Kraemer, K. L., & Perl, H. (2006). Challenges applying al- cohol brief interventions in diverse practice settings: Populations, outcomes, and costs. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 30, 332-338. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00038.x. · DOI
  31. Schermer, C., Moyers, T., Miller, W., & Bloom, F. L. (2006). Trauma center brief interven- tions for alcohol disorders decrease subsequent driving under the influence arrests. Journal of Trauma, 60, 29-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000199420.12322.5d. · DOI
  32. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration [SAMHSA] (1999). Brief in- terventions and brief therapies for substance use. Rockville, MD: Author. *Suffoletto, B., Callaway, C., Kristan, J., Kraemer, K., & Clark, D. B. (2012). Text-message- based drinking assessments and brief interventions for young adults discharged from the emergency department. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 36, 552-560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01646.x. · DOI
  33. Trinks, A., Festin, K., Bendtsen, P., & Nilsen, P. (2010). Reach and effectiveness of a com- puter based alcohol intervention in a Swedish emergency room. International Emergency Nursing, 3, 138-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2009.08.004. · DOI
  34. Trinks, A., Festin, K., Bendtsen, P., & Nilsen, P. (2013). What makes emergency depart- ment patients reduce their alcohol consumption? A computer-based intervention study in Sweden. International Emergency Nursing, 21, 3-9. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.ienj.2011.11.004. · DOI
  35. Vaca, F., Winn, D., Anderson, C., Kim, D., & Arcila, M. (2011). Six-month follow-up of com- puterized alcohol screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment in the emer- gency department. Substance Abuse, 32, 144-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/ 08897077.2011.562743. · DOI
  36. Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., Westhorp, G., Buckingham, J., & Pawson, R. (2013). RAMESES publication standards: Realist synthesis. BioMed Cent Med, 11, 1-14 (Retrieved Janu- ary 22, 2015 from http://www.biomedcentral.com/ 1741-7015/11/21).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Landy, M. S. H., Davey, C. J., Quintero, D., Pecora, A., & McShane, K. E.
Affiliations
  • Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
  • Canadian Mental Health Association (CA)
  • York University (CA)
Corresponding author
McShane, Kelly E.
Venue
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
61
Pages
1-12
ISSN
0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1751803807
Cited by
66
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
brief intervention, alcohol abuse, emergency department, alcohol screening, alcohol consumption reduction, alcohol-related injuries, hospitalization, risky driving behavior, traffic accidents
MeSH terms
Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Counseling, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Risk-Taking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review