Cited by 66Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsBehavioral Health and Interventions

Brief Interventions in Primary Care: An Evidence Overview of Practitioner and Digital Intervention Programmes

Open access
Beyer, Fiona, Lynch, Ellen, Kaner, Eileen·2018·Current Addiction Reports

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: Excessive drinking is a major public health problem that adversely affects all parts of the population. Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have reported that brief interventions delivered in primary care are effective at reducing alcohol consumption, albeit with small effect sizes that have decreased over time. This review summarises the updated evidence base on practitioner and digitally delivered brief interventions. RECENT FINDINGS: Using Cochrane methodology, 69 primary care brief intervention trials (33,642 participants) and 57 digital intervention trials (34,390 participants) were identified. Meta-analyses showed both approaches significantly reduced consumption compared to controls. Five trials (390 participants) compared practitioner-delivered and digital interventions directly with no evidence of difference in outcomes at follow-up. SUMMARY: Brief interventions have the potential to impact at both individual and population levels. Future research should focus on optimising components and delivery mechanisms, and on alcohol-related harms. Digital interventions may overcome some of the implementation barriers faced by practitioner-delivered interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40429-018-0198-7

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Meta-analytic evidence indicates that BIs are effective for treating harmful substance use.

    “Most importantly, meta-analytic evidence indicates that BIs are effective for treating harmful substance use [14,20].”

    From A scoping review of substance use brief interventions in Africa (2024) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Evidence of Effectiveness section (page unavailable) reports meta-analytic evidence that brief alcohol interventions reduce alcohol consumption. The claim broadens this finding to harmful substance use generally; the cited evidence concerns alcohol, not other substances. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Systematic reviews have shown that preventive interventions in the primary care setting can be effective in changing patient behavior, including reducing alcohol consumption, increasing physical activity, smoking cessation, and weight loss.

    “Systematic reviews have shown that preventive interventions in the primary care setting can be effective in changing patient behavior, including reducing alcohol consumption [17], increasing physical activity [18], smoking cessation [19], and weight loss [20].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beyer, F., Lynch, E., & Kaner, E.
Affiliations
Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Beyer, Fiona
Venue
Current Addiction Reports
Published
2018-05-03
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
265-273
ISSN
2196-2952 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2801307057
Cited by
66
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Addiction Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Funders
Newcastle University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
brief intervention, excessive alcohol consumption, alcohol consumption reduction, primary care, digital interventions, alcohol-related harm, implementation barriers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review