The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Error correction, revision, and learning
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Equally however, research reminds us that it does not always fulfill this potential (e.g.Ferris, 2006;Truscott & Hsu, 2008)”
From Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing (2018) · cites this paper as Truscott & Hsu, 2008
Citations
Cites
The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes
Truscott, J. (1996) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x · Cited by 1,874
Self-citationChandler, J. (2003) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(03)00038-9 · Cited by 1,110
Error feedback in L2 writing classes
Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(01)00039-x · Cited by 981
The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to truscott (1996)
Ferris, D. R. (1999) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80110-6 · Cited by 856
The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately
Truscott, J. (2007) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.06.003 · Cited by 771
Self-citationThe Research Manual: Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistics
Bailey, K. M., Hatch, E. M., & Lazaraton, A. (1994) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587214 · Cited by 728
Ferris, D. R. (2004) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.005 · Cited by 679
Ferris, D. (2006) · Feedback in Second Language Writing · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524742.007 · Cited by 662
Second Language Writing. Research Insights for the Classroom.
Kroll, B. (1990) · Modern Language Journal · Cited by 656
Kepner, C. G. (1991) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05359.x · Cited by 627
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing
Zhang, Z. (., & Hyland, K. (2018) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004 · Cited by 546
Evidence on the Effectiveness of Comprehensive Error Correction in Second Language Writing
van Beuningen, C., de Jong, N. H., & Kuiken, F. (2011) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00674.x · Cited by 516
Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.002 · Cited by 446
The potential role(s) of writing in second language development
Williams, J. (2012) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.007 · Cited by 406
Ferris, D. R. (2010) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263109990490 · Cited by 523
Metadata
- Authors
- Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. Y.-P.
- Affiliations
- National Tsing Hua University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Truscott, John
- ORCID
- Truscott, John
- Venue
- Journal of Second Language Writing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 292-305
- ISSN
- 1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068495385
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 145.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Second Language Writing (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Tsing Hua University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- error correction, corrective feedback, revision, second language writing, learning to write, short-term learning, error reduction, narrative writing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
