Cited by 56Social Media in Health EducationInnovations in Medical EducationDiversity and Career in Medicine

Professional Use of Social Media Among Surgeons: Results of a Multi-Institutional Study

Wagner, Justin P., Cochran, Amalia L., Jones, Christian, Gusani, Niraj J., Varghese, Thomas K., Attai, Deanna J.·2018·Journal of Surgical Education

Abstract

Objective Among surgeons, professional use of social media (SM) is varied, and attitudes are ambiguous. We sought to characterize surgeons' professional use and perceptions of SM.Design Surgical faculty and trainees received institutional review board-approved e-mail surveys assessing SM usage and attitudes. Regression analyses identified predictors of SM attitudes and preference for professional contact.Setting Surveys were administered to surgical faculty, fellows, and residents at 4 academic medical centers between January and April 2016.Participants Of 1037 surgeons, clinical fellows, and residents e-mailed, 208 (20%) responded, including 132 faculty and 76 trainees.Results Among 208 respondents, 46 (22%) indicated they preferred some form of SM as their preferred networking and communication modality. A total of 145 (70%) indicated they believe SM benefits professional development. The position of clinical resident predicted preference to maintain professional contact via SM (p = 0.03). Age <55 predicted positive attitude (p = 0.02) and rank of associate professor predicted negative attitude toward SM (p = 0.03). Lack of time as well as personal and patient privacy concerns were cited most commonly as reasons for not using SM.Conclusions Most of surgeons responding to our survey used some form of SM for professional purposes. Perceived barriers include lack of value, time constraints, and personal and patient privacy concerns. Generational differences in surgeon attitudes suggest usage of SM among surgeons will expand over time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.09.008

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wagner, J. P., Cochran, A. L., Jones, C., Gusani, N. J., Varghese, T. K., & Attai, D. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Attai, Deanna J.
Venue
Journal of Surgical Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
75
Issue
3
Pages
804-810
ISSN
  • 1878-7452 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-7204
OpenAlex
W2759006706
Cited by
56
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5
FWCI
6.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of surgical education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
social media, surgeons, professional networking, attitudes toward social media, barriers to social media use, privacy concerns, time constraints, generational differences, surgical residents, surgical faculty, professional development
MeSH terms
Academic Medical Centers, Attitude of Health Personnel, Confidentiality, Education, Medical, Graduate, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Risk Assessment, Social Media, Surgeons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review