Cited by 33Sleep and Work-Related FatigueCoffee research and impactsSleep and Wakefulness Research

Dose-dependent model of caffeine effects on human vigilance during total sleep deprivation

Ramakrishnan, Sridhar, Laxminarayan, Srinivas, Wesensten, Nancy J., Kamimori, Gary H., Balkin, Thomas J., Reifman, Jaques·2014·Journal of Theoretical Biology

Abstract

Caffeine is the most widely consumed stimulant to counter sleep-loss effects. While the pharmacokinetics of caffeine in the body is well-understood, its alertness-restoring effects are still not well characterized. In fact, mathematical models capable of predicting the effects of varying doses of caffeine on objective measures of vigilance are not available. In this paper, we describe a phenomenological model of the dose-dependent effects of caffeine on psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) performance of sleep-deprived subjects. We used the two-process model of sleep regulation to quantify performance during sleep loss in the absence of caffeine and a dose-dependent multiplier factor derived from the Hill equation to model the effects of single and repeated caffeine doses. We developed and validated the model fits and predictions on PVT lapse (number of reaction times exceeding 500 ms) data from two separate laboratory studies. At the population-average level, the model captured the effects of a range of caffeine doses (50-300 mg), yielding up to a 90% improvement over the two-process model. Individual-specific caffeine models, on average, predicted the effects up to 23% better than population-average caffeine models. The proposed model serves as a useful tool for predicting the dose-dependent effects of caffeine on the PVT performance of sleep-deprived subjects and, therefore, can be used for determining caffeine doses that optimize the timing and duration of peak performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.05.017

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The impact of caffeine on performance appears to be greater under conditions that would negatively impact performance, such as acute caffeine withdrawal or sleep deprivation.

    “The impact of caffeine appears to be greater under conditions that would negatively impact performance, such as acute caffeine withdrawal (74–76) or sleep deprivation (71, 77).”

    From The Safety of Ingested Caffeine: A Comprehensive Review (2017) · cites this paper as [77]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramakrishnan, S., Laxminarayan, S., Wesensten, N. J., Kamimori, G. H., Balkin, T. J., & Reifman, J.
Affiliations
  • Telemedicine & Advanced Technology Research Center (US)
  • Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (US)
Venue
Journal of Theoretical Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
358
Pages
11-24
ISSN
0022-5193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171058933
Cited by
33
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5
FWCI
5.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Theoretical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
caffeine, total sleep deprivation, psychomotor vigilance task, sustained attention, dose-dependent effects, Hill equation, alertness, individual differences, mathematical modeling
MeSH terms
Attention, Caffeine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Sleep Deprivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review