Cited by 355Coffee research and impactsPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismPlant-based Medicinal Research

Caffeine disposition after oral doses

Bonati, Maurizio, Latini, Roberto, Galletti, Ferruccio, Young, John F, Tognoni, Gianni, Garattini, Silvio·1982·Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics

Abstract

Caffeine (TMX) disposition was studied in mean after 1, 5, and 10 mg/kg in water, as mocha coffee (1.54 mg/kg) and as a soft drink (0.22 mg/kg). TMX and its metabolites were analyzed in plasma and urine by high-pressure liquid chromatography. The design permitted confirmation of most of the partial results in various experimental settings and contributed new data on the metabolic disposition of TMX, with specific reference to main dimethylxanthine metabolite found in plasma, paraxanthine (1,7-dimethylxanthine). Different analysis methods were compared for the calculated parameters (absorption and elimination rate constants and renal clearance)to assess the consistency of results. The kinetics of TMX and of its dimethylated metabolites in plasma were described with a model that used an analogdigital hybrid computing system. In addition to providing a comprehensive profile of TMS disposition in the healthy adult, the results indicate tha TMX exhibits dose-independent kinetics at the levels at which man normally takes TMX.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/clpt.1982.132

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The kinetics of caffeine have been reported to be linear in doses up to 10 mg/kg bw.

    “The kinetics of caffeine have been reported to be linear in doses up to 10 mg/kg bw (Bonati et al., 1982), whereas a later study claimed non-linearity beginning at doses as high as 500 mg, corresponding to about 7.1 mg/kg bw (Kaplan et al., 1997).”

    From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Bonati et al., 1982

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bonati, M., Latini, R., Galletti, F., Young, J. F., Tognoni, G., & Garattini, S.
Affiliations
National Center for Toxicological Research (US)
Corresponding author
Bonati, Maurizio
Venue
Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1982-07
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
98-106
ISSN
  • 0009-9236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-6535
OpenAlex
W2047855828
Cited by
353
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 20
FWCI
8.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Plant-based Medicinal Research
Keywords
caffeine, oral administration, caffeine metabolites, paraxanthine, 1,7-dimethylxanthine, dimethylxanthines, absorption rate constant, elimination rate constant, renal clearance, plasma kinetics, coffee, soft drinks, pharmacokinetic modeling
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Biotransformation, Caffeine, Carbonated Beverages, Coffee, Humans, Kinetics, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review