Cited by 76Transportation Planning and OptimizationTransportation and Mobility InnovationsUrban and Freight Transport Logistics

Shortest path or anchor-based route choice: a large-scale empirical analysis of minicab routing in London

Open access
Manley, E.J., Addison, J.D., Cheng, T.·2015·Journal of Transport Geography

Abstract

Understanding and modelling route choice behaviour is central to predicting the formation and propagation of urban road congestion. Yet within conventional literature disagreements persist around the nature of route choice behaviour, and how it should be modelled. In this paper, both the shortest path and anchor-based perspectives on route choice behaviour are explored through an empirical analysis of nearly 700,000 minicab routes across London, United Kingdom. In the first set of analyses, the degree of similarity between observed routes and possible shortest paths is established. Shortest paths demonstrate poor performance in predicting both observed route choice and characteristics. The second stage of analysis explores the influence of specific urban features, named anchors, in route choice. These analyses show that certain features attract more route choices than would be expected were individuals choosing route based on cost minimisation alone. Instead, the results indicate that major urban features form the basis of route choice planning – being selected disproportionately more often, and causing asymmetry in route choice volumes by direction of travel. At a finer scale, decisions made at minor road features are furthermore demonstrated to influence routing patterns. The results indicate a need to revisit the basis of how routes are modelled, shifting from the shortest path perspective to a mechanism structured around urban features. In concluding, the main trends are synthesised within an initial framework for route choice modelling, and presents potential extensions of this research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.01.006

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A city street network is transformed into a network of lines using its topological properties.

    “First, a city street network is transformed into a network of lines using its topological properties 34,[173][174][175] .”

    From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [173]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Manley, E. J., Addison, J. D., & Cheng, T.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Manley, E.J.
Venue
Journal of Transport Geography
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
43
Pages
123-139
ISSN
0966-6923 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067114702
Cited by
76
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
16.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Transport Geography (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/G023212/1)
  • Transport for London
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban and Freight Transport Logistics
Keywords
route choice, shortest path, urban traffic congestion, urban characteristics, cost minimization, London

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review