Cited by 54Transportation Planning and OptimizationUrban Design and Spatial AnalysisUrban Transport and Accessibility

A heuristic model of bounded route choice in urban areas

Open access
Manley, E.J., Orr, S.W., Cheng, T.·2015·Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Abstract

There is substantial evidence to indicate that route choice in urban areas is complex cognitive process, conducted under uncertainty and formed on partial perspectives. Yet, conventional route choice models continue make simplistic assumptions around the nature of human cognitive ability, memory and preference. In this paper, a novel framework for route choice in urban areas is introduced, aiming to more accurately reflect the uncertain, bounded nature of route choice decision making. Two main advances are introduced. The first involves the definition of a hierarchical model of space representing the relationship between urban features and human cognition, combining findings from both the extensive previous literature on spatial cognition and a large route choice dataset. The second advance involves the development of heuristic rules for route choice decisions, building upon the hierarchical model of urban space. The heuristics describe the process by which quick, ‘good enough’ decisions are made when individuals are faced with uncertainty. This element of the model is once more constructed and parameterised according to findings from prior research and the trends identified within a large routing dataset. The paper outlines the implementation of the framework within a real-world context, validating the results against observed behaviours. Conclusions are offered as to the extension and improvement of this approach, outlining its potential as an alternative to other route choice modelling frameworks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.trc.2015.03.020

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A city street network is transformed into a network of lines using its topological properties.

    “First, a city street network is transformed into a network of lines using its topological properties 34,[173][174][175] .”

    From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [174]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Manley, E. J., Orr, S. W., & Cheng, T.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Manley, E.J.
Venue
Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
56
Pages
195-209
ISSN
0968-090X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008688250
Cited by
54
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
10.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/G023212/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
Keywords
route choice, urban travel behavior, bounded rationality, heuristic decision making, spatial cognition, decision making under uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review