Cited by 137Transportation and Mobility InnovationsTransportation Planning and OptimizationUrban Transport and Accessibility

Implications of automated vehicles for accessibility and location choices: Evidence from an expert-based experiment

Open access
Milakis, Dimitris, Kroesen, Maarten, van Wee, Bert·2018·Journal of Transport Geography

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.03.010

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A Q-method study of seventeen international accessibility experts found that AVs could trigger the densification of consolidated city centers in parallel with the growth of new minor centers.

    “For instance, [20] apply a Q-method to a sample of seventeen international accessibility experts who think that AVs could trigger the densification of consolidated city centers in parallel with the growth of new minor centers.”

    From Implications of Autonomous Vehicles for Accessibility and Transport Equity: A Framework Based on Literature (2021) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Conclusions and discussion report a Q-method study of seventeen international accessibility experts. Section 4.2 says experts in viewpoint B expect densification of existing city centres alongside new peripheral centres. The claim implies this was the view of all seventeen experts, but section 4.1 says viewpoint A considered further city-centre densification relatively unlikely. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • People who cannot afford a private vehicle or to spend much money on transport services could be excluded from benefits of transport automation, which will be mainly accessible for people with high income.

    “In particular, people who cannot afford a private vehicle or to spend much money on transport services could be excluded from the benefits of transport automation, which will be mainly accessible for people with high income (e.g., [20,60]).”

    From Implications of Autonomous Vehicles for Accessibility and Transport Equity: A Framework Based on Literature (2021) · cites this paper as [20]

    Section 4.3 and the Conclusions say that, under one expert viewpoint, those who can afford an automated vehicle will mainly enjoy its benefits, and that early vehicles will be expensive. The paper does not extend that affordability finding to transport services or establish that automation benefits generally will be mainly accessible to high-income people; its conceptual framework also considers potentially lower-cost shared services. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Only a few studies focus on accessibility as the main research topic.

    “Nevertheless, only a few studies focus on accessibility as the main research topic (e.g., [5,20]).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Milakis, D., Kroesen, M., & van Wee, B.
Affiliations
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Milakis, Dimitris
Venue
Journal of Transport Geography
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
68
Pages
142-148
ISSN
0966-6923 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2791561412
Cited by
137
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 3
FWCI
8.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Transport Geography (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Technische Universiteit Delft
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
Keywords
autonomous vehicles, accessibility (transport and spatial geography), location choice, expert opinion, urban form, urban sprawl, urban densification, social equity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review