Cited by 38Water Resource Management and QualityChild Nutrition and Water AccessWater Quality and Resources Studies

The challenge of global water access monitoring: evaluating straight-line distance versus self-reported travel time among rural households in Mozambique

Ho, Jeff C., Russel, Kory C., Davis, Jennifer·2014·Journal of Water and Health

Abstract

Support is growing for the incorporation of fetching time and/or distance considerations in the definition of access to improved water supply used for global monitoring. Current efforts typically rely on self-reported distance and/or travel time data that have been shown to be unreliable. To date, however, there has been no head-to-head comparison of such indicators with other possible distance/time metrics. This study provides such a comparison. We examine the association between both straight-line distance and self-reported one-way travel time with measured route distances to water sources for 1,103 households in Nampula province, Mozambique. We find straight-line, or Euclidean, distance to be a good proxy for route distance (R(2) = 0.98), while self-reported travel time is a poor proxy (R(2) = 0.12). We also apply a variety of time- and distance-based indicators proposed in the literature to our sample data, finding that the share of households classified as having versus lacking access would differ by more than 70 percentage points depending on the particular indicator employed. This work highlights the importance of the ongoing debate regarding valid, reliable, and feasible strategies for monitoring progress in the provision of improved water supply services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2166/wh.2013.042

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ho, J. C., Russel, K. C., & Davis, J.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Davis, Jennifer
Venue
Journal of Water and Health
Published
2013-09-24
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
173-183
ISSN
  • 1477-8920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1996-7829
OpenAlex
W1993946558
Cited by
38
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Water and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Millennium Challenge Corporation
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Resources Studies
Keywords
water access, improved water supply, straight-line distance, route length, water fetching, rural households
MeSH terms
Adult, Family Characteristics, Female, Humans, Male, Mozambique, Rural Population, Time Factors, Travel, Water Supply, Geographic Information Systems, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review