The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health—a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force
Open accessAbstract
Background The application of conjoint analysis (including discrete-choice experiments and other multiattribute stated-preference methods) in health has increased rapidly over the past decade. A wider acceptance of these methods is limited by an absence of consensus-based methodological standards.Objective The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force was established to identify good research practices for conjoint-analysis applications in health.Methods The task force met regularly to identify the important steps in a conjoint analysis, to discuss good research practices for conjoint analysis, and to develop and refine the key criteria for identifying good research practices. ISPOR members contributed to this process through an extensive consultation process. A final consensus meeting was held to revise the article using these comments, and those of a number of international reviewers.Results Task force findings are presented as a 10-item checklist covering: 1) research question; 2) attributes and levels; 3) construction of tasks; 4) experimental design; 5) preference elicitation; 6) instrument design; 7) data-collection plan; 8) statistical analyses; 9) results and conclusions; and 10) study presentation. A primary question relating to each of the 10 items is posed, and three sub-questions examine finer issues within items.Conclusions Although the checklist should not be interpreted as endorsing any specific methodological approach to conjoint analysis, it can facilitate future training activities and discussions of good research practices for the application of conjoint-analysis methods in health care studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“While conjoint analysis has been previously applied to vaccine and other biomedical research, [29–32] it has not been used to assess HPV vaccine acceptability in India.”
From Acceptability of HPV vaccination for cervical cancer prevention amongst emerging adult women in rural Mysore, India: a mixed-methods study (2024) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We followed recommended guidelines to design and implement the DCE. [7, 8, 11–16]”
From Assessing the American public's preferences for reforms to teen driving licensure systems: a discrete choice experiment (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“A survey containing a DCE was developed and administered according to best practice guidelines [26].”
From Consumer preferences for teledermoscopy screening to detect melanoma early (2016) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“In recent years, DCEs have been increasingly used in health and health care settings [9,10], as well as in addiction research [11] and digital health [4-6].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., Swait́, J., & Adamowicz, W. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753831 · Cited by 7,008
Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., & Erikson, P. (2005) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x · Cited by 5,521
Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2008) · Cited by 5,345
Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook
Green, P. E., & Srinivasan, V. (1978) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208721 · Cited by 3,165
Applied choice analysis a primer
Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2005) · Cited by 2,619
Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making: A User??s Guide
Lancsar, E., & Louviere, J. (2008) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004 · Cited by 1,707
Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research
Orme, B. K. (2005) · Cited by 1,082
The Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Choice Designs
Huber, J. C., & Zwerina, K. (1996) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379603300305 · Cited by 1,023
Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care
Ryan, M. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1530 · Cited by 942
Mauskopf, J., Sullivan, S. D., Annemans, L., Jaime, J., Mullins, C. D., Nuijten, M. J. C., Orlewska, E., Watkins, J., & Trueman, P. (2007) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00187.x · Cited by 752
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Chong, 2007, Do clinical practice guidelines incorporate evidence on patient preferences?, Med Decis Making, 27, E63
- Bridges, 2010, Common avoidance and determinants of demand for male circumcision in Johannesburg, South Africa, Health Policy Plan
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,001
Parental and societal values for the risks and benefits of childhood combination vaccines
Gidengil, C. A., Lieu, T. A., Payne, K., Rusinak, D., Messonnier, M. L., & Prosser, L. A. (2012) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.03.022 · Cited by 65
Self-citationBøgelund, M., Vilsbøll, T., Faber, J., Henriksen, J. E., Gjesing, R. P., & Lammert, M. (2011) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1185/03007995.2011.625404 · Cited by 66
Dirksen, C. D., Utens, C. M. A., Joore, M. A., van Barneveld, T. A., Boer, B., Dreesens, D. H. H., van Laarhoven, H., Smit, C., Stiggelbout, A. M., & van der Weijden, T. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-64 · Cited by 65
Welte, T. (2012) · Deutsches Ärzteblatt international · doi:10.3238/arztebl.2012.0759 · Cited by 66
Bansback, N. J., Hole, A. R., Mulhern, B. J., & Tsuchiya, A. (2014) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.026 · Cited by 65
Almario, C. V., Keller, M. S., Chen, M. S., Lasch, K. L., Ursos, L., Shklovskaya, J., MELMED, G. Y., & Spiegel, B. M. R. (2017) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2017.470 · Cited by 65
Preferences for COVID-19 vaccine distribution strategies in the US: A discrete choice survey
Eshun‐Wilson, I., Mody, A., Tram, K. H., Bradley, C., Sheve, A., Fox, B., Thompson, V. L. S., & Geng, E. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256394 · Cited by 67
Preparatory study for the revaluation of the EQ-5D tariff: methodology report
Mulhern, B. J., Bansback, N. J., Brazier, J. E., Buckingham, K., Cairns, J., Devlin, N. J., Dolan, P., Hole, A. R., Kavetsos, G., Longworth, L., et al. (2014) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta18120 · Cited by 64
Wortley, S., Wong, G., Kieu, A., & Howard, K. (2014) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-014-0054-3 · Cited by 62
Johnson, S. R., Naden, R. P., Fransen, J., van den Hoogen, F. H. J., Pope, J. E., Baron, M. G., Tyndall, A., Matucci‐Cerinic, M., Denton, C. P., Distler, O., et al. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.009 · Cited by 63
Hauber, B., Nguyen, H. P., Posner, J., Kalsekar, I. D., & Ruggles, J. (2015) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1185/03007995.2015.1117433 · Cited by 63
Preferences for antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis C: a discrete choice experiment
Mühlbacher, A. C., Bridges, J. F. P., Bethge, S., Dintsios, C., Schwalm, A., Gerber‐Grote, A., & Nübling, M. (2016) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-016-0763-8 · Cited by 62
Self-citationWu, C., Hultman, C. S., Diegidio, P., Hermiz, S. J., Garimella, R. S., Crutchfield, T. M., & Lee, C. N. (2016) · Aesthetic Surgery Journal · doi:10.1093/asj/sjw143 · Cited by 63
Wong, C. K. H., Man, K. K. C., Ip, P., Kwan, M. Y. W., & McGhee, S. M. (2017) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2017.10.012 · Cited by 63
Women’s Preferences for Treatment of Perinatal Depression and Anxiety: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Ride, J., & Lancsar, E. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0156629 · Cited by 62
Makaroff, K. E., Shergill, J., Lauzon, M., Khalil, C., Ahluwalia, S. C., Spiegel, B. M. R., & Almario, C. V. (2022) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.012 · Cited by 62
Patient Understanding of the Risks and Benefits of Biologic Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Martinez, B., Dailey, F. E., Almario, C. V., Keller, M. S., Desai, M., Dupuy, T. P., Mosadeghi, S., Whitman, C. B., Lasch, K. L., Ursos, L., et al. (2017) · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · doi:10.1097/mib.0000000000001110 · Cited by 62
Consumer preferences for teledermoscopy screening to detect melanoma early
Spinks, J., Janda, M., Soyer, H. P., & Whitty, J. A. (2016) · Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare · doi:10.1177/1357633x15586701 · Cited by 61
Zimmermann, T., Clouth, J., Elosge, M., Heurich, M., Schneider, E. M., Wilhelm, S., & Wolfrath, A. (2013) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2012.11.062 · Cited by 61
Cunningham, C. E., Chen, Y., Deal, K., Rimas, H. L., McGrath, P. J., Reid, G. J., Lipman, E. L., & Corkum, P. V. (2013) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-013-9728-x · Cited by 61
Porteous, T., Ryan, M., Bond, C. M., Watson, M. C., & Watson, V. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152257 · Cited by 63
A Discrete Choice Study of Patient Preferences for Dialysis Modalities
Walker, R., Morton, R. L., Palmer, S. C., Marshall, M. R., Tong, A., & Howard, K. (2017) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.06830617 · Cited by 62
Preferences for Immunotherapy in Melanoma: A Systematic Review
Livingstone, A., Agarwal, A. A., Stockler, M. R., Menzies, A. M., Howard, K., & Morton, R. L. (2019) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-019-07963-y · Cited by 60
Brún, A. D., Flynn, D., Ternent, L., Price, C., Rodgers, H., Ford, G. A., Rudd, M. P., Lancsar, E., Simpson, S., Teah, J., et al. (2018) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3305-5 · Cited by 59
Ramsay, C. R., Clarkson, J. E., Duncan, A., Lamont, T. J., Heasman, P. A., Boyers, D., Goulão, B., Bonetti, D., Bruce, R., Gouick, J., et al. (2018) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta22380 · Cited by 57
Preferences for pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV: A systematic review of discrete choice experiments
Wulandari, L. P. L., He, S. Y., Fairley, C. K., Bavinton, B. R., Schmidt, H.-M. A., Wiseman, V. L., Guy, R., Tang, W., Zhang, L., & Ong, J. J. (2022) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101507 · Cited by 59
Patients’ preferences for osteoporosis drug treatment: a discrete-choice experiment
Hiligsmann, M., Dellaert, B. G. C., Dirksen, C. D., van der Weijden, T., Goemaere, S., Reginster, J., Watson, V., & Boonen, A. E. R. C. H. (2014) · Arthritis Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/ar4465 · Cited by 59
The value of diagnostic testing for parents of children with rare genetic diseases
Marshall, D. A., MacDonald, K. V., Heidenreich, S., Hartley, T., Bernier, F. P., Gillespie, M. K., McInnes, B. L., Innes, A. M., Armour, C. M., & Boycott, K. M. (2019) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41436-019-0583-1 · Cited by 58
Self-citationWomen's and healthcare professionals' preferences for prenatal testing: a discrete choice experiment
Beulen, L., Grutters, J. P. C., Faas, B. H. W., Feenstra, I., Groenewoud, H., van Vugt, J. M. G., & Bekker, M. N. (2015) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.4571 · Cited by 57
The impacts of potency, warning messages, and price on preferences for Cannabis flower products
Shi, Y., Cao, Y., Shang, C., & Pacula, R. L. (2019) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.07.037 · Cited by 60
Preferences for long-term care insurance in China: Results from a discrete choice experiment
Wang, Q., Abiiro, G. A., Yang, J. H., Li, P., & Allegri, M. D. (2021) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114104 · Cited by 65
Abdel-All, M., Angell, B. J., Jan, S., Howell, M., Howard, K., Abímbọ́lá, Ṣ., & Joshi, R. (2019) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001509 · Cited by 56
Tockhorn‐Heidenreich, A., Ryan, M., & Hernández, R. A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-4068-9_10 · Cited by 58
Cunningham, C. E., Rimas, H. L., Mielko, S., Mapp, C., Cunningham, L. J., Buchanan, D. H., Vaillancourt, T., Chen, Y., Deal, K., & Marcus, M. (2015) · Journal of School Violence · doi:10.1080/15388220.2015.1095100 · Cited by 56
Vallejo‐Torres, L., Melnychuk, M., Vindrola‐Padros, C., Aitchison, M., Clarke, C. S., Fulop, N., Hines, J. E. W., Levermore, C., Maddineni, S. B., Perry, C., et al. (2018) · British journal of surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.10761 · Cited by 55
Cook, N. S., Cave, J., & Holtorf, A. (2019) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2019.00082 · Cited by 56
A conjoint analysis of stated vaccine preferences in Shanghai, China
Sun, X., Wagner, A. L., Ji, J., Huang, Z., Zikmund‐Fisher, B. J., Boulton, M. L., Ren, J., & Prosser, L. A. (2019) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.11.062 · Cited by 55
Self-citationTervonen, T., Gelhorn, H. L., Bhashyam, S. S., Poon, J. L., Gries, K. S., Rentz, A. M., & Marsh, K. (2017) · Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety · doi:10.1002/pds.4255 · Cited by 55
Ladin, K., Emerson, J. G., Butt, Z. A., Gordon, E. J., Hanto, D. W., Perloff, J. N., Daniels, N., & Lavelle, T. A. (2018) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2017-104695 · Cited by 55
Seanehia, J., Treibich, C., Holmberg, C., Müller‐Nordhorn, J., Casin, V., Raude, J., & Mueller, J. E. (2017) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.03.086 · Cited by 54
Patient Preferences for Preventive Migraine Treatments: A Discrete‐Choice Experiment
Mansfield, C. A., Gebben, D., Sutphin, J., Tepper, S. J., Schwedt, T. J., Sapra, S. J., & Shah, N. A. (2019) · Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain · doi:10.1111/head.13498 · Cited by 54
Lopatina, E., Donald, F., DiCenso, A., Martin‐Misener, R., Kilpatrick, K., Bryant‐Lukosius, D., Carter, N., Reid, K. J., & Marshall, D. A. (2017) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.04.012 · Cited by 53
Self-citationTaking the Shortcut: Simplifying Heuristics in Discrete Choice Experiments
Veldwijk, J., Marceta, S. M., Swait́, J., Lipman, S. A., & de Bekker-Grob, E. W. (2023) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-023-00625-y · Cited by 66
Patient values and preferences for antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation
Loewen, P. S., Ji, T. A., Kapanen, A. I., & McClean, A. R. (2017) · Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1160/th16-10-0787 · Cited by 53
A study on Chinese consumer preferences for food traceability information using best-worst scaling
Liu, C., Li, J., Steele, W., & Fang, X. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0206793 · Cited by 53
Colver, A. F., Rapley, T., Parr, J. R., McConachie, H., Dovey‐Pearce, G., Couteur, A. S. L., McDonagh, J. E. R., Bennett, C., Hislop, J., Maniatopoulos, G., et al. (2019) · Programme Grants for Applied Research · doi:10.3310/pgfar07040 · Cited by 53
Ng, V., & Sargeant, J. M. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072172 · Cited by 52
Rozier, M. D., Ghaferi, A. A., Rose, A. M., Simon, N.-J., Birkmeyer, N., & Prosser, L. A. (2018) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4375 · Cited by 52
Self-citationPatient and physician preferences for ulcerative colitis treatments in the United States
Boeri, M., Myers, K., Ervin, C. M., Marren, A., DiBonaventura, M., Cappelleri, J. C., Hauber, B., & Rubin, D. T. (2019) · Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology · doi:10.2147/ceg.s206970 · Cited by 52
de Llano, L. A. P., Davila, I. J., Martínez‐Moragón, E., Domínguez‐Ortega, J., Almonacid, C., Colás, C., Rivero, J. L. G., Carmona, L., de Yébenes, M. J. G., Cosío, B. G., et al. (2021) · The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice · doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2021.01.033 · Cited by 52
The Patient Perspective of Diabetes Care: A Systematic Review of Stated Preference Research
von Arx, L., & Kjær, T. (2014) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-014-0057-0 · Cited by 51
Lancaster, K. E., Cooper, H. L. F., Browning, C. R., Malvestutto, C., Bridges, J. F. P., & Young, A. M. (2020) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.1080/10826084.2020.1800741 · Cited by 51
Self-citationA Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Oncology Treatments
Collacott, H., Soekhai, V., Thomas, C., Brooks, A. B., Brookes, E., Lo, R., Mulnick, S., & Heidenreich, S. (2021) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-021-00520-4 · Cited by 50
Ruwaard, D. (2016) · International Journal of Integrated Care · doi:10.5334/ijic.2208 · Cited by 51
Eliasson, L., de Freitas, H. M., Dearden, L., Calimlim, B., & Lloyd, A. J. (2017) · Clinical Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.02.009 · Cited by 50
Self-citationTurk, D., Boeri, M., Abraham, L., Atkinson, J., Bushmakin, A. G., Cappelleri, J. C., Hauber, B., Klein, K., Russo, L., Viktrup, L., et al. (2020) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2020.06.006 · Cited by 51
The essential ingredients of research supervision: A discrete-choice experiment.
Roach, A., Christensen, B. K., & Rieger, E. (2019) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000322 · Cited by 57
Patient Preferences for Features of Health Care Delivery Systems: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Mühlbacher, A. C., Bethge, S., Reed, S. D., & Schulman, K. A. (2015) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12345 · Cited by 49
Health Technology Assessment in Osteoporosis
Hiligsmann, M., Kanis, J. А., Compston, J. E., Cooper, C. C., Flamion, B., Bergmann, P., Body, J., Boonen, S., Bruyère, O., Devogelaer, J., et al. (2013) · Calcified Tissue International · doi:10.1007/s00223-013-9724-8 · Cited by 47
Public preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests: a review of conjoint analysis studies
Ghanouni, A., Smith, S., Halligan, S., Plumb, A., Boone, D., Yao, G., Zhu, S.-H., Lilford, R., Wardle, J., & von Wagner, C. (2013) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1586/17434440.2013.811867 · Cited by 36
Struik, M. H. L., Koster, F., Schuit, A. J., Nugteren, R., Veldwijk, J., & Lambooij, M. (2014) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-9-69 · Cited by 47
Veldwijk, J., Essers, B. A. B., Lambooij, M., Dirksen, C. D., Smit, H. A., & de Wit, G. A. (2016) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2015.11.004 · Cited by 49
Uemura, H., Matsubara, N., Kimura, G., Yamaguchi, A., Ledesma, D. A., DiBonaventura, M., Mohamed, A. F., Basurto, E., McKinnon, I., Wang, E., et al. (2016) · BMC Urology · doi:10.1186/s12894-016-0182-2 · Cited by 49
Fifer, S. J., Ho, K.-A., Lybrand, S., Axford, L. J., & Roach, S. (2020) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-020-07018-6 · Cited by 51
Cunningham, C. E., Chen, Y., Vaillancourt, T., Rimas, H. L., Deal, K., Cunningham, L. J., & Ratcliffe, J. (2014) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.21560 · Cited by 50
Ostermann, J., Njau, B. J., Mtuy, T. B., Brown, D. S., Mühlbacher, A. C., & Thielman, N. M. (2015) · AIDS Care · doi:10.1080/09540121.2014.998612 · Cited by 47
Benjamin, L., Cotté, F.-E., Philippe, C., Mercier, F., Bachelot, T., & Vidal-Trecan, G. M. (2011) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2011.09.019 · Cited by 48
Pignone, M. P., Crutchfield, T. M., Brown, P., Hawley, S. T., Laping, J. L., Lewis, C. L., Lich, K. H., Richardson, L. C., Tangka, F. K. L., & Wheeler, S. B. (2014) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-014-0611-4 · Cited by 48
Parenting in Childhood Life-Threatening Illness: A Mixed-Methods Study
Mooney‐Doyle, K., Deatrick, J. A., Ulrich, C. M., Meghani, S. H., & Feudtner, C. (2017) · Journal of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1089/jpm.2017.0054 · Cited by 48
Mansfield, C. A., Sikirica, M. V., Pugh, A., Poulos, C. M., Unmuessig, V., Moraño, R. B., & Martin, A. A. (2017) · Diabetes Therapy · doi:10.1007/s13300-017-0326-8 · Cited by 48
Webb, E., Meads, D. M., Eskytė, I., King, N. V., Dracup, N., Chataway, J., Ford, H. L., Marti, J., Pavitt, S. H., Schmierer, K., et al. (2018) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-017-0296-y · Cited by 49
Bahrampour, M., Byrnes, J., Norman, R., Scuffham, P., & Downes, M. (2020) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-020-01189-6 · Cited by 51
Igarashi, A., Hansen, B. B., Langer, J., Tavella, F., Collings, H., Davies, N., & Wyn, R. (2020) · Advances in Therapy · doi:10.1007/s12325-020-01561-1 · Cited by 49
Eliciting Preferences for HIV Prevention Technologies: A Systematic Review
Beckham, S. W., Crossnohere, N. L., Gross, M., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2020) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-020-00486-9 · Cited by 48
Self-citationCunningham, C. E., Barwick, M. A., Short, K. H., Chen, Y., Rimas, H. L., Ratcliffe, J., & Mielko, S. (2013) · School Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s12310-013-9110-8 · Cited by 49
Patient preferences for glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor–agonist treatment attributes
Thieu, V. T., Robinson, S. J., Kennedy‐Martin, T., Boye, K. S., & García‐Pérez, L. (2019) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s187907 · Cited by 47
Treatment preferences of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a qualitative study
Parsons, J. A., Greenspan, N. R., Baker, N. A., McKillop, C., Hicks, L. K., & Chan, O. (2019) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-019-5467-x · Cited by 51
Gale, R., Eberlein, S. A., Fuller, G., Khalil, C., Almario, C. V., & Spiegel, B. M. R. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.20940 · Cited by 45
Quantifying benefit-risk preferences for new medicines in rare disease patients and caregivers
Morel, T., Aymé, S., Cassiman, D. M., Simoens, S., Morgan, M., & Vandebroek, M. L. (2016) · Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases · doi:10.1186/s13023-016-0444-9 · Cited by 50
Michaels-Igbokwe, C., MacDonald, S. E., & Currie, G. R. (2017) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-017-0244-x · Cited by 47
Boeri, M., Sutphin, J., Hauber, B., Cappelleri, J. C., Romero, W., & Bonaventura, M. D. (2020) · Journal of Dermatological Treatment · doi:10.1080/09546634.2020.1832185 · Cited by 46
Diks, M. E., Hiligsmann, M., & van der Putten, I. M. (2021) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/s12879-021-06398-9 · Cited by 48
Tervonen, T., Veldwijk, J., Payne, K., Ng, X.-Y., Levitan, B., Lackey, L., Marsh, K., Thokala, P., Pignatti, F., Donnelly, A. M., et al. (2023) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2022.12.006 · Cited by 39
Bewtra, M., & Johnson, F. R. (2013) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-013-0031-2 · Cited by 45
Self-citationWords or graphics to present a Discrete Choice Experiment: Does it matter?
Veldwijk, J., Lambooij, M., van Til, J. A., Groothuis‐Oudshoorn, C. G. M., Smit, H. A., & de Wit, G. A. (2015) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2015.06.002 · Cited by 45
Hollowell, J., Li, Y., Malouf, R. S., & Buchanan, J. P. (2016) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-016-0998-5 · Cited by 45
Ulph, F., Wright, S. J., Dharni, N., Payne, K., Bennett, R., Roberts, S. A., Walshe, K., & Lavender, T. (2017) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta21550 · Cited by 45
Dermatologist and Patient Preferences in Choosing Treatments for Moderate to Severe Psoriasis
Alcusky, M. J., Lee, S., Lau, G., Chiu, G. R., Hadker, N., Deshpande, A., Fleming, S., Vance, N., & Fakharzadeh, S. S. (2017) · Dermatology and Therapy · doi:10.1007/s13555-017-0205-2 · Cited by 45
Lancaster, K. E., Lungu, T., Bula, A. K., Shea, J., Shoben, A. B., Hosseinipour, M. C., Kohler, R. E., Hoffman, I., Go, V. F.-L., Golin, C. E., et al. (2019) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-019-02705-3 · Cited by 45
Patient Preferences for Multiple Myeloma Treatments: A Multinational Qualitative Study
Janssens, R., Lang, T., Vallejo, A., Galinsky, J., Plate, A., Morgan, K., Cabezudo, M.-E., Silvennoinen, R. H., Coriu, D., BADELITA, S. N., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.686165 · Cited by 48
Discrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review
Vass, C., Gray, E., & Payne, K. (2015) · International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy · doi:10.1007/s11096-015-0221-1 · Cited by 44
Martinez, E., García‐Domínguez, J. M., Muñoz, D., Comellas, M., Gozalbo, I., Lizán, L., & Polanco, C. (2016) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s114619 · Cited by 44
Patients’ priorities in selecting chronic lymphocytic leukemia treatments
Mansfield, C. A., Masaquel, A. S., Sutphin, J., Weiss, E. S., Gutierrez, M. E., Wilson, J., Boeri, M., Li, J., & Reyes, C. M. (2017) · Blood Advances · doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2017007294 · Cited by 44
Whitty, J. A., & Gonçalves, A. S. O. (2017) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-017-0288-y · Cited by 44
Janse, S., Dumanis, S. B., Huwig, T., Hyman, S. R., Fureman, B. E., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2019) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.04.018 · Cited by 44
Self-citationTreatment Preference Among People With Cystic Fibrosis
Cameron, R. A., Daniel Office, Matthews, J., Rowley, M., Abbott, J., Simmonds, N. J., Whitty, J. A., & Carr, S. B. (2022) · CHEST Journal · doi:10.1016/j.chest.2022.07.008 · Cited by 47
Comparison of statistical analysis methods for object case best–worst scaling
Cheung, K. L., Mayer, S., Simon, J., de Vries, H., Evers, S., Kremer, I., & Hiligsmann, M. (2018) · Journal of Medical Economics · doi:10.1080/13696998.2018.1553781 · Cited by 52
Dirksen, C. D. (2014) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1586/14737167.2014.948852 · Cited by 43
Haac, B. E., O’Hara, N. N., Mullins, C. D., Stein, D. M., Manson, T. T., Johal, H. S., Castillo, R. C., O’Toole, R. V., & Slobogean, G. P. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016676 · Cited by 43
Association of Preferences for Papillary Thyroid Cancer Treatment With Disease Terminology
Nickel, B., Howard, K., Brito, J. P., Barratt, A. L., Moynihan, R. N., & McCaffery, K. J. (2018) · JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2018.1694 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Bridges, J. F. P., Hauber, A. B., Marshall, D., Lloyd, A., Prosser, L. A., Regier, D. A., Johnson, F. R., & Mauskopf, J.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- University of Calgary (CA)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
- RTI Health Solutions (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bridges, John F.P.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Value in Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 403-413
- ISSN
- 1098-3015 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121619367
- Cited by
- 2,029
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 184 · 2025: 199 · 2024: 217 · 2023: 178 · 2022: 213 · 2021: 195 · 2020: 158 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 124 · 2016: 84 · 2015: 91 · 2014: 77 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 37
- FWCI
- 134.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Value in Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
- Keywords
- conjoint analysis, discrete choice experiment, stated preference methods, good scientific practice, methodological standards, checklists, preference elicitation, experimental design, ISPOR
- MeSH terms
- Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Research Design, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Economics, Pharmaceutical, Advisory Committees, Internationality, Checklist, Research Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
