The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health—a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force
Open accessAbstract
Background The application of conjoint analysis (including discrete-choice experiments and other multiattribute stated-preference methods) in health has increased rapidly over the past decade. A wider acceptance of these methods is limited by an absence of consensus-based methodological standards.Objective The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force was established to identify good research practices for conjoint-analysis applications in health.Methods The task force met regularly to identify the important steps in a conjoint analysis, to discuss good research practices for conjoint analysis, and to develop and refine the key criteria for identifying good research practices. ISPOR members contributed to this process through an extensive consultation process. A final consensus meeting was held to revise the article using these comments, and those of a number of international reviewers.Results Task force findings are presented as a 10-item checklist covering: 1) research question; 2) attributes and levels; 3) construction of tasks; 4) experimental design; 5) preference elicitation; 6) instrument design; 7) data-collection plan; 8) statistical analyses; 9) results and conclusions; and 10) study presentation. A primary question relating to each of the 10 items is posed, and three sub-questions examine finer issues within items.Conclusions Although the checklist should not be interpreted as endorsing any specific methodological approach to conjoint analysis, it can facilitate future training activities and discussions of good research practices for the application of conjoint-analysis methods in health care studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“While conjoint analysis has been previously applied to vaccine and other biomedical research, [29–32] it has not been used to assess HPV vaccine acceptability in India.”
From Acceptability of HPV vaccination for cervical cancer prevention amongst emerging adult women in rural Mysore, India: a mixed-methods study (2024) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We followed recommended guidelines to design and implement the DCE. [7, 8, 11–16]”
From Assessing the American public's preferences for reforms to teen driving licensure systems: a discrete choice experiment (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“A survey containing a DCE was developed and administered according to best practice guidelines [26].”
From Consumer preferences for teledermoscopy screening to detect melanoma early (2016) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“In recent years, DCEs have been increasingly used in health and health care settings [9,10], as well as in addiction research [11] and digital health [4-6].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., Swait́, J., & Adamowicz, W. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753831 · Cited by 7,008
Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., & Erikson, P. (2005) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x · Cited by 5,521
Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2008) · Cited by 5,345
Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook
Green, P. E., & Srinivasan, V. (1978) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208721 · Cited by 3,165
Applied choice analysis a primer
Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2005) · Cited by 2,619
Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making: A User??s Guide
Lancsar, E., & Louviere, J. (2008) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004 · Cited by 1,707
Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research
Orme, B. K. (2005) · Cited by 1,082
The Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Choice Designs
Huber, J. C., & Zwerina, K. (1996) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379603300305 · Cited by 1,023
Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care
Ryan, M. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1530 · Cited by 942
Mauskopf, J., Sullivan, S. D., Annemans, L., Jaime, J., Mullins, C. D., Nuijten, M. J. C., Orlewska, E., Watkins, J., & Trueman, P. (2007) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00187.x · Cited by 752
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Chong, 2007, Do clinical practice guidelines incorporate evidence on patient preferences?, Med Decis Making, 27, E63
- Bridges, 2010, Common avoidance and determinants of demand for male circumcision in Johannesburg, South Africa, Health Policy Plan
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,001
Kerkhoff, A. D., West, N., Castro, M. D. M., Branigan, D., Christopher, D. J., Denkinger, C. M., Nhung, N. V., Theron, G., Worodria, W. O., Yu, C. Y., et al. (2023) · BMC Global and Public Health · doi:10.1186/s44263-023-00027-0 · Cited by 18
Hansford, H. J., Jones, M. D., Cashin, A. G., Ostelo, R., Chiarotto, A., Williams, S. A., Sharma, S., Rose, J. M., Devonshire, J. J., Ferraro, M. C., et al. (2024) · Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12279 · Cited by 18
Community Preferences for the Allocation & Donation of Organs - The PAraDOx Study
Howard, K., Jan, S., Rose, J. M., Chadban, S. J., Allen, R. D. M., Irving, M. J., Tong, A., Wong, G., Craig, J. C., & Cass, A. (2011) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-386 · Cited by 13
An Empirical Study of Two Alternative Comparators for Use in Time Trade-Off Studies
Shah, K. K., Mulhern, B. J., Longworth, L., & Janssen, M. F. (2015) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2015.10.012 · Cited by 18
Whitaker, K. L., Ghanouni, A., Zhou, Y., Lyratzopoulos, G., & Stephen Morris, A. (2017) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp17x690905 · Cited by 19
Marti, J., Bachhuber, M. A., Feingold, J. H., Meads, D. M., Richards, M. R., & Hennessy, S. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016229 · Cited by 18
Weernink, M. G. M., van Til, J. A., Witteman, H. O., Fraenkel, L., & IJzerman, M. J. (2018) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x18765185 · Cited by 18
Finkelstein, E. A., Özdemir, S., Malhotra, C., Jafar, T. H., Lin, L. C. H., & Wen, S. G. S. (2018) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.06.008 · Cited by 18
Eaton, S., Biggerstaff, D. L., Petrou, S., Osipenko, L., Gibbs, J., Estcourt, C. S., Sadiq, S. T., & Szczepura, A. K. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023663 · Cited by 19
The relative importance of genetic parenthood
Hendriks, S., van Wely, M., D’Hooghe, T., Meißner, A., Mol, F., Peeraer, K., Repping, S., & Dancet, E. A. F. (2019) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.02.008 · Cited by 18
Harrison, M. J., Bansback, N. J., Aguiar, M., Koehn, C. L., Shojania, K., Finckh, A., & Hudson, M. (2020) · Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1007/s10067-020-05072-w · Cited by 18
Stewart, D. E., Wood, D., Alcorn, J. B., Lease, E. D., Hayes, M. A., Hauber, B., & Goff, R. R. (2021) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-020-01377-7 · Cited by 18
Collacott, H., Zhang, D., Heidenreich, S., & Tervonen, T. (2021) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-021-00536-w · Cited by 18
Quantifying Benefit-Risk Preferences for Heart Failure Devices: A Stated-Preference Study
Reed, S. D., Yang, J., Rickert, T., Johnson, F. R., González, J. M., Mentz, R. J., Krucoff, M. W., Vemulapalli, S., Adamson, P. B., Gebben, D., et al. (2021) · Circulation Heart Failure · doi:10.1161/circheartfailure.121.008797 · Cited by 18
Self-citationIgarashi, A., Nakano, Y., & Yoneyama-Hirozane, M. (2022) · Expert Review of Vaccines · doi:10.1080/14760584.2022.2016402 · Cited by 18
Mahieu, P., Andersson, H., Beaumais, O., Sourd, R. C. D., & Wolff, F. (2015) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.13140/rg.2.1.4286.9602 · Cited by 18
Garfield, S. S., Douglas, M. P., MacDonald, K. V., Marshall, D. A., & Phillips, K. A. (2015) · Personalized Medicine · doi:10.2217/pme.14.74 · Cited by 18
Self-citationConstant-Sum Paired Comparisons for Eliciting Stated Preferences: A Tutorial
Skedgel, C. D., & Regier, D. A. (2014) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-014-0077-9 · Cited by 20
Self-citationHeisen, M., Baeten, S. A., Verheggen, B. G., Stoelzel, M., Hakimi, Z., Ridder, A. M., van Maanen, R., & Stolk, E. A. (2016) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1185/03007995.2016.1142959 · Cited by 18
Hiligsmann, M., Ronda, G., van der Weijden, T., & Boonen, A. E. R. C. H. (2016) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-016-3555-1 · Cited by 18
Valuing Attributes of Home Palliative Care With Service Users: A Pilot Discrete Choice Experiment
Gomes, B., de Brito, M. F., Sarmento, V. P., Yi, D., Soares, D. D. S., Fernandes, J., Fonseca, B., Gonçalves, E., Ferreira, P. L., & Higginson, I. J. (2017) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.05.005 · Cited by 18
Katz, D. A., Stewart, K. R., Paez, M., Weg, M. W. V., Grant, K. M., Hamlin, C., & Gaeth, G. J. (2018) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-018-0316-6 · Cited by 18
Two discrete choice experiments on laboratory safety decisions and practices
Wirth, O., Foreman, A. M., Friedel, J. E., & Andrew, M. E. (2020) · Journal of Safety Research · doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2020.08.005 · Cited by 18
Svedsäter, H., Leather, D. A., Robinson, T., Doll, H., Nafees, B., & Bradshaw, L. (2017) · Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2017.09.010 · Cited by 17
Preferences of Canadian Patients and Physicians for Adjuvant Treatments for Melanoma
Stellato, D., Thabane, M. E., Eichten, C., & Delea, T. E. (2019) · Current Oncology · doi:10.3747/co.26.5085 · Cited by 16
Beusterien, K. M., Maculaitis, M. C., Hallissey, B., Gaschler, M. M., Smith, M. L., & Law, E. H. (2021) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s298670 · Cited by 17
Liu, F., Hu, H., Wang, J., Chen, Y., Sun, H., & Hu, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.653450 · Cited by 17
Monzani, D., Petrocchi, S., Oliveri, S., Veldwijk, J., Janssens, R., Bailo, L., Smith, M. Y., Smith, I. P., Schoefs, E., Nackaerts, K., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.689114 · Cited by 17
Preference for Immunotherapy with Tablets by People with Allergic Rhinitis
Tankersley, M. S., Winders, T. A., Aagren, M., Brandi, H., Pedersen, M. H., Loftager, A. S. L., & Bøgelund, M. (2021) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s338337 · Cited by 17
Rosenow, F., Winter, Y., Leunikava, I., Brunnert, M., Joeres, L., Sutphin, J., Boeri, M., Smith, J., Villani, F. S., & Brandt, C. (2021) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/epi.17137 · Cited by 17
Yong, C., Cambron-Mellott, M. J., Seal, B., Will, O., Maculaitis, M. C., Clapp, K., Mulvihill, E., Cotarla, I., & Mehra, R. (2022) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s338840 · Cited by 17
Sijben, J., Peters, Y., van der Velden, K., Rainey, L., Siersema, P. D., & Broeders, M. J. M. (2022) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101367 · Cited by 17
Liu, S., Gu, Y., Yang, Y., Schroeder, L., & Chen, Y. (2022) · Human Resources for Health · doi:10.1186/s12960-022-00743-y · Cited by 17
Preferences for a polygenic test to estimate cancer risk in a general Australian population
Venning, B., Saya, S., Lourenço, R. D. A., Street, D. J., & Emery, J. D. (2022) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.gim.2022.07.011 · Cited by 18
Willems, D., Hinzpeter, E.-L., van der Zee, H. H., Sayed, C. J., Ingram, J. R., Beaudart, C., Evers, S., & Hiligsmann, M. (2023) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-022-00614-7 · Cited by 18
Grivas, P. D., Veeranki, P., Chiu, K., Pawar, V. S., Chang, J., & Bharmal, M. F. (2023) · Future Oncology · doi:10.2217/fon-2022-0767 · Cited by 17
Barthold, D., Saldarriaga, E. M., Brah, A. T., Hauber, B., Banerjee, P., Fuller, S. M., McCaslin, D., Moldoveanu, A. M., Marconi, V. C., Simoni, J. M., et al. (2023) · AIDS · doi:10.1097/qad.0000000000003620 · Cited by 17
Applying Quantitative Benefit–Risk Analysis to Aid Regulatory Decision Making in Diagnostic Imaging
Agapova, M., Devine, E. B., Bresnahan, B. W., Higashi, M. K., & Garrison, L. P. (2014) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2014.05.006 · Cited by 17
Patient Preferences of a Low-Income Hispanic Population for Mental Health Services in Primary Care
Herman, P. M., Ingram, M., Rimas, H. L., Carvajal, S. C., & Cunningham, C. E. (2015) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-015-0687-0 · Cited by 17
Kauf, T. L., Mohamed, A. F., Hauber, B., Fetzer, D., & Ahmad, A. (2012) · Patient · doi:10.1007/bf03262498 · Cited by 17
Preferences for Pharmacist Counselling in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Kawaguchi, T., Azuma, K., Yamaguchi, T., Iwase, S., Matsunaga, T., Yamada, K., Miyamatsu, H., Takeuchi, H., Kohno, N., Akashi, T., et al. (2014) · Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin · doi:10.1248/bpb.b14-00452 · Cited by 17
Whitty, J. A., Ratcliffe, J., Kendall, E. A., Burton, P., Wilson, A. J., Littlejohns, P., Harris, P., Krinks, R., & Scuffham, P. (2015) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008919 · Cited by 19
Kohler, R. E., Lee, C. N., Gopal, S., Reeve, B. B., Wheeler, S. B., & Weiner, B. J. (2015) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s87341 · Cited by 17
What factors drive heterogeneity of preferences for micro-health insurance in rural Malawi?
Abiiro, G. A., Torbica, A., Kwalamasa, K., & Allegri, M. D. (2016) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czw049 · Cited by 19
Zipursky, R. B., Cunningham, C. E., Stewart, B., Rimas, H. L., Cole, E., & Vaz, S. M. (2016) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2016.12.018 · Cited by 17
Heringa, M., Floor‐Schreudering, A., Wouters, H., Smet, P. A. G. M. D., & Bouvy, M. L. (2017) · Drug Safety · doi:10.1007/s40264-017-0601-7 · Cited by 17
Patient Preferences for Endometriosis Pain Treatments in the United States
Poulos, C. M., Soliman, A. M., Renz, C. L., Posner, J., & Agarwal, S. K. (2019) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2018.12.010 · Cited by 17
Byrne, M. M., Thurer, R. J., & Studts, J. L. (2019) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.2445 · Cited by 17
Physician preferences for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treatment
Srinivas, S., Mohamed, A. F., Appukkuttan, S., Botteman, M. F., Ng, X., Joshi, N., Horodniceanu, E. G., Waldeck, A. R., & Simmons, S. J. (2020) · BMC Urology · doi:10.1186/s12894-020-00631-4 · Cited by 17
Wong, X. Y., Lim, A. Q. J., Shen, Q., Chia, J. W.-K., Chew, M. H., Tan, W. S., & Wee, H. L. (2020) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1080/03007995.2020.1790348 · Cited by 17
Bauer, B., Brockmeier, B., Devonshire, V. A., Charbonne, A., Wach, D., & Hendin, B. A. (2020) · Neurodegenerative Disease Management · doi:10.2217/nmt-2020-0034 · Cited by 17
Mühlbacher, A. C., Sadler, A., & Juhnke, C. (2021) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-021-01264-6 · Cited by 16
Hawke, L. D., Thabane, L., Wilkins, L. K., Mathias, S., Iyer, S. N., & Henderson, J. L. (2021) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-021-00510-6 · Cited by 17
Fernández, O., Lázaro-Quintela, M., Crespo, G., de Prado, D. S., Pinto, Á., Basterretxea, L., de Liaño, A. G., Etxaniz, O., Blasco, S., Gabás-Rivera, C., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.773366 · Cited by 17
Goossens, A. J. M., Cheung, K. L., Sijstermans, E., Conde, R., Rodríguez, J. L. G., & Hiligsmann, M. (2020) · Journal of Medical Economics · doi:10.1080/13696998.2020.1735398 · Cited by 18
Kamran, S., Conti, F., Pomey, M., Baron, G., Calmus, Y., & Vidal-Trecan, G. M. (2017) · Transplant International · doi:10.1111/tri.12944 · Cited by 17
Mathijssen, E. G. E., van Heuckelum, M., van Dijk, L., Vervloet, M., Zonnenberg, S., Vriezekolk, J. E., & van den Bemt, B. J. F. (2018) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s170721 · Cited by 16
Shared Decision Making: From Decision Science to Data Science
Shaoibi, A., Neelon, B., & Lenert, L. A. (2020) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x20903267 · Cited by 15
Youth Perspectives on Integrated Youth Services: A Discrete Choice Conjoint Experiment
Henderson, J., Hawke, L. D., Iyer, S. N., Hayes, E., Darnay, K., Mathias, S., & Thabane, L. (2022) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/07067437211044717 · Cited by 20
What Tinnitus Therapy Outcome Measures Are Important for Patients?– A Discrete Choice Experiment
Rademaker, M. M., Essers, B. A. B., Stokroos, R. J., Smit, A. L., & Stegeman, I. (2021) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.668880 · Cited by 17
Dieci, M., Wagner, Z., Friedman, W., Burgess, S., Vandermark, J., McCoy, S. I., Shah, M., & Dow, W. H. (2021) · Studies in Family Planning · doi:10.1111/sifp.12170 · Cited by 16
How pet owners choose antiparasitic treatments for their dogs: A discrete choice experiment
Bebrysz, M., WRIGHT, A. K., Greaves, M., Rathwell-Deault, D., Hopkins, G., Gildea, E., & Aballéa, S. (2021) · Preventive Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105493 · Cited by 16
Auclair, D., Mansfield, C. A., Fiala, M. A., Chari, A., Cole, C. E., Kaufman, J. L., Orloff, G. J., Siegel, D. S., Zonder, J. A., Mange, B., et al. (2022) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s345906 · Cited by 17
Kowal, M. R., Douglas, F., Jayne, D. G., & Meads, D. M. (2022) · Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1111/codi.16242 · Cited by 16
Preference for Type 2 Diabetes Therapies in the United States: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Shubrook, J. H., Radin, M. S., Ali, S. N., Chubb, B., DiPietrantonio, K., Collings, H., Wyn, R., & Smith, M. J. A. (2022) · Advances in Therapy · doi:10.1007/s12325-022-02181-7 · Cited by 17
Huls, S. P. I., van Exel, J. N. A., & de Bekker-Grob, E. W. (2023) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104986 · Cited by 18
Kinter, E. T., Prior, T. J., Carswell, C., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2012) · Patient · doi:10.1007/bf03262499 · Cited by 16
Self-citationMarsh, K., Thokala, P., Mühlbacher, A. C., & Lanitis, T. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47540-0_4 · Cited by 16
Cunningham, C. E., Barwick, M. A., Rimas, H. L., Mielko, S., & Barac, R. (2017) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-017-0824-z · Cited by 16
Patient preferences for personalized (N-of-1) trials: a conjoint analysis
Moise, N., Wood, D., Cheung, Y. K. K., Duan, N., Onge, T. S., Duer-Hefele, J., Pu, T., Davidson, K. W., Kronish, I. M., Alcántara, C., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.020 · Cited by 16
Boeri, M., Szegvari, B., Hauber, B., Mange, B., Mountian, I., Schiff, M. H., & Maniadakis, N. (2019) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s203775 · Cited by 16
Patient Preferences in the Medical Product Lifecycle
Whitty, J. A., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Cook, N. S., Terris‐Prestholt, F., Drummond, M., Falchetto, R. A., & Hillege, H. L. (2019) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-019-00400-y · Cited by 16
Lv, Y., Fu, Q. J., Shen, X., Jia, E., Li, X., Peng, Y., Yan, J., Jiang, M., & Xiong, J. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17228420 · Cited by 16
Johnson, A. C., Luta, G., Tercyak, K. P., NIAURA, R. S., & Mays, D. M. (2021) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106951 · Cited by 16
Richardson, D. R., & Loh, K. P. (2021) · Journal of Geriatric Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jgo.2021.06.001 · Cited by 16
Pereira, C. C. D. A., Torres, T. S., Luz, P. M., Hoagland, B., de Farias, A. H. T., Brito, J. D. U., Lacerda, M., da Silva, D. A. R., Benedetti, M., Pimenta, M. C., et al. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049011 · Cited by 16
Willingness-to-pay for cancer treatment and outcome: a systematic review
Yong, A. S. J., Lim, Y. H., Cheong, W. L., Hamzah, E., & Teoh, S. L. (2021) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-021-01407-9 · Cited by 16
Zhang, J., Ge, P., Li, X., Yin, M., Wang, Y., Ming, W., Li, J., Li, P., Sun, X., & Wu, Y. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19084842 · Cited by 16
Brún, A. D., Flynn, D., Ternent, L., Price, C., Rodgers, H., Ford, G. A., Rudd, M. P., Lancsar, E., Simpson, S., Teah, J., et al. (2017) · International Journal of Stroke · doi:10.1177/1747493017690755 · Cited by 16
Evaluating alcoholics anonymous sponsor attributes using conjoint analysis
Stevens, E. B., & Jason, L. A. (2015) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.06.043 · Cited by 16
What Matters to Women When Making Decisions About Breast Cancer Chemoprevention?
Martinez, K. A., Fagerlin, A., Witteman, H. O., Holmberg, C., & Hawley, S. T. (2015) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-015-0134-z · Cited by 16
Williams, G., & Kinchin, I. (2023) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-022-01528-9 · Cited by 16
Patient preferences for chronic lymphocytic leukemia treatments: a discrete-choice experiment
Ravelo, A., Myers, K., Brumble, R., Bussberg, C., Koffman, B., Manzoor, B. S., Biondo, J. M. L., & Mansfield, C. A. (2024) · Future Oncology · doi:10.1080/14796694.2024.2348440 · Cited by 15
Jagemann, I., Stegemann, M., von Brachel, R., & Hirschfeld, G. H. F. (2024) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-024-06134-y · Cited by 17
Muntingh, A., Hoogendoorn, A. W., van Schaik, A., van Straten, A., Stolk, E. A., van Balkom, A. J. L. M., & Batelaan, N. M. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0219588 · Cited by 18
van Dijke, I., van Wely, M., Berkman, B. E., Bredenoord, A. L., Henneman, L., Vliegenthart, R., Repping, S., & Hendriks, S. (2020) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deaa212 · Cited by 17
Williams, N. J., Candon, M. K., Stewart, R. E., Byeon, Y. V., Bewtra, M., Buttenheim, A. M., Zentgraf, K. A., Comeau, C., Shoyinka, S., & Beidas, R. S. (2021) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-021-03072-x · Cited by 15
Saposnik, G., Andhavarapu, S., Fernández, Ó., Kim, H. J., Wiendl, H., Foss, M. M., Zuo, F., Havrdová, E., Celius, E., Cáceres, F., et al. (2021) · Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.msard.2021.103404 · Cited by 15
Carey, K. A., Farrar, M. A., Kasparian, N. A., Street, D. J., & Lourenço, R. D. A. (2021) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1111/dmcn.15135 · Cited by 15
Brain, D., Jadambaa, A., & Kularatna, S. (2022) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08464-7 · Cited by 17
Muchandifunga Trust Muchadeyi, Hernández-Villafuerte, K., & Schlander, M. (2022) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-022-01784-6 · Cited by 15
Murry, L. T., Viyyuri, B. R., Chapman, C. G., Witry, M. J., Kennelty, K. A., Nayakankuppam, D., Doucette, W. R., & Urmie, J. M. (2023) · Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.01.008 · Cited by 15
González, J. M., Ganguli, A. X., Morgans, A. K., TOMBAL, B. F., Hotte, S. J., Suzuki, H., Bhadauria, H. S., Oh, M., Scales, C. D., Wallace, M. J., et al. (2023) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-023-00638-7 · Cited by 15
González, J. M., Grover, K., LeBlanc, T. W., & Reeve, B. B. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0287766 · Cited by 15
Estorff, F. V., Mochtar, M. H., Lehmann, V., & van Wely, M. (2024) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmae001 · Cited by 15
Patient Preferences in the Treatment of Moderate-to-severe Atopic Dermatitis
Ameen, M., Alhusayen, R. O., Brandi, H., Bøgelund, M., Jensen, H. H., Reitzel, S. B., & Thyssen, J. P. (2024) · Acta Dermato Venereologica · doi:10.2340/actadv.v104.24339 · Cited by 15
Patient versus physician preferences for lipid‐lowering drug therapy: A discrete choice experiment
Zhang, L., Chen, J., Cao, Z., Zhang, M., Ma, R., Zhang, P., Yao, G., & Li, X. (2024) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.14043 · Cited by 14
Hua, R., Fu, H., Liang, G., & Yang, F. (2024) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-024-12000-0 · Cited by 16
Franco, M. R., Ferreira, M. L., Howard, K., Sherrington, C., Rose, J. M., Haines, T. P., & Ferreira, P. H. (2013) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002355 · Cited by 15
de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Bergstra, A. D., Bliemer, M. C. J., Trijssenaar-Buhre, I. J. M., & Burdorf, A. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142507 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Bridges, J. F. P., Hauber, A. B., Marshall, D., Lloyd, A., Prosser, L. A., Regier, D. A., Johnson, F. R., & Mauskopf, J.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- University of Calgary (CA)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
- RTI Health Solutions (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bridges, John F.P.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Value in Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 403-413
- ISSN
- 1098-3015 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121619367
- Cited by
- 2,029
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 184 · 2025: 199 · 2024: 217 · 2023: 178 · 2022: 213 · 2021: 195 · 2020: 158 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 124 · 2016: 84 · 2015: 91 · 2014: 77 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 37
- FWCI
- 134.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Value in Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
- Keywords
- conjoint analysis, discrete choice experiment, stated preference methods, good scientific practice, methodological standards, checklists, preference elicitation, experimental design, ISPOR
- MeSH terms
- Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Research Design, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Economics, Pharmaceutical, Advisory Committees, Internationality, Checklist, Research Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
