The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health—a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force
Open accessAbstract
Background The application of conjoint analysis (including discrete-choice experiments and other multiattribute stated-preference methods) in health has increased rapidly over the past decade. A wider acceptance of these methods is limited by an absence of consensus-based methodological standards.Objective The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force was established to identify good research practices for conjoint-analysis applications in health.Methods The task force met regularly to identify the important steps in a conjoint analysis, to discuss good research practices for conjoint analysis, and to develop and refine the key criteria for identifying good research practices. ISPOR members contributed to this process through an extensive consultation process. A final consensus meeting was held to revise the article using these comments, and those of a number of international reviewers.Results Task force findings are presented as a 10-item checklist covering: 1) research question; 2) attributes and levels; 3) construction of tasks; 4) experimental design; 5) preference elicitation; 6) instrument design; 7) data-collection plan; 8) statistical analyses; 9) results and conclusions; and 10) study presentation. A primary question relating to each of the 10 items is posed, and three sub-questions examine finer issues within items.Conclusions Although the checklist should not be interpreted as endorsing any specific methodological approach to conjoint analysis, it can facilitate future training activities and discussions of good research practices for the application of conjoint-analysis methods in health care studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“While conjoint analysis has been previously applied to vaccine and other biomedical research, [29–32] it has not been used to assess HPV vaccine acceptability in India.”
From Acceptability of HPV vaccination for cervical cancer prevention amongst emerging adult women in rural Mysore, India: a mixed-methods study (2024) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We followed recommended guidelines to design and implement the DCE. [7, 8, 11–16]”
From Assessing the American public's preferences for reforms to teen driving licensure systems: a discrete choice experiment (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“A survey containing a DCE was developed and administered according to best practice guidelines [26].”
From Consumer preferences for teledermoscopy screening to detect melanoma early (2016) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“In recent years, DCEs have been increasingly used in health and health care settings [9,10], as well as in addiction research [11] and digital health [4-6].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., Swait́, J., & Adamowicz, W. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753831 · Cited by 7,008
Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., & Erikson, P. (2005) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x · Cited by 5,521
Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2008) · Cited by 5,345
Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook
Green, P. E., & Srinivasan, V. (1978) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208721 · Cited by 3,165
Applied choice analysis a primer
Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2005) · Cited by 2,619
Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making: A User??s Guide
Lancsar, E., & Louviere, J. (2008) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004 · Cited by 1,707
Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research
Orme, B. K. (2005) · Cited by 1,082
The Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Choice Designs
Huber, J. C., & Zwerina, K. (1996) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379603300305 · Cited by 1,023
Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care
Ryan, M. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1530 · Cited by 942
Mauskopf, J., Sullivan, S. D., Annemans, L., Jaime, J., Mullins, C. D., Nuijten, M. J. C., Orlewska, E., Watkins, J., & Trueman, P. (2007) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00187.x · Cited by 752
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Chong, 2007, Do clinical practice guidelines incorporate evidence on patient preferences?, Med Decis Making, 27, E63
- Bridges, 2010, Common avoidance and determinants of demand for male circumcision in Johannesburg, South Africa, Health Policy Plan
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,001
Neurologists’ preferences for device-aided therapy for advanced Parkinson’s disease in Japan
Fujioka, S., Mishima, T., Yamazaki, T., Bebrysz, M., Nomoto, M., Yamaguchi, J., Fujimura, K., Migita, H., Aballéa, S., & Tsuboi, Y. (2022) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1080/03007995.2022.2129800 · Cited by 12
George, D. J., Mohamed, A. F., Tsai, J., Karimi, M., Ning, N., Jayade, S. P., & Botteman, M. F. (2022) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.5313 · Cited by 12
Chen, Y., Saldarriaga, E. M., Montaño, M. A., Ngure, K., Thuo, N. B., Kiptinness, C., Rafferty, M., Terris‐Prestholt, F., Stergachis, A. S., Mugambi, M. L., et al. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069195 · Cited by 12
Livingstone, A., Howard, K., Menzies, A. M., Long, G. V., Stockler, M. R., & Morton, R. L. (2023) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-023-00635-w · Cited by 12
Emmert, M., Rohrbacher, S., Jahn, J., Fernando, K., & Lauerer, M. (2023) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-023-00641-y · Cited by 13
Vo, L. K., Allen, M. J., Cunich, M. M., Thillainadesan, J., McPhail, S., Sharma, P., Wallis, S., McGowan, K., & Carter, H. E. (2023) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116459 · Cited by 16
Nurses’ job preferences on the internet plus nursing service program: a discrete choice experiment
He, Y., Feng, G., Wang, C., Yang, D., Hu, L., Ming, W., & Chen, W. (2024) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-023-01692-0 · Cited by 12
Feldman, S. R., Guérin, A., Gauthier‐Loiselle, M., Claxton, A. J., Hazra, N. C., Meng, Y., Gallant, K., & Balu, S. (2024) · Journal of Dermatological Treatment · doi:10.1080/09546634.2024.2345739 · Cited by 12
Diño, M. J. S., Dion, K. W., Abadir, P. M., Budhathoki, C. B., Huang, C., Padula, W. V., Ong, I. L., Himmelfarb, C. D., Davidson, P. M., & Thiamwong, L. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108507 · Cited by 12
Implementing artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening: Women’s preferences
Pearce, A. M., Carter, S. M., Frazer, H. M. L., Houssami, N., Macheras‐Magias, M., Webb, G., & Marinovich, M. L. (2025) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.35859 · Cited by 14
Mohamed, A. F., Johnson, F. R., Hauber, B., Lescrauwaet, B., & Masterson, A. J. (2012) · European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1097/meg.0b013e328350914c · Cited by 12
Self-citationPatient’s Utility for Various Attributes of Diabetes Care Services
Mishra, V., Samuel, C., & Sharma, S. K. (2018) · IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review · doi:10.1177/2277975218798134 · Cited by 12
Kataria, I., Ngongo, C. J., Lim, S. C., Kocher, E. L., Kowal, P. R., Chandran, A., Kual, A., Khaw, F.-M., & Mustapha, F. I. (2020) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-020-00080-y · Cited by 12
Hu, Q., Hu, H., Hu, M., Yang, Y., Wu, Z., & Zhou, N. (2020) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.597389 · Cited by 12
Feldman, S. R., Poulos, C. M., Gilloteau, I., Mange, B., Boehm, K., Boeri, M., Naatz, M., & Augustin, M. (2021) · Journal of Dermatological Treatment · doi:10.1080/09546634.2020.1839007 · Cited by 12
Bywall, K. S., Veldwijk, J., HANSSON, M. G., Baecklund, E., Raza, K., Falahee, M., & Kihlbom, U. (2021) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2021.03.013 · Cited by 12
Johnson, F. R., González, J. M., Yang, J., Özdemir, S., & Kymes, S. M. (2021) · Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-0009.12523 · Cited by 12
Self-citationLi, H., Yuan, H., Wan, G., Xue, H., & Zhang, X. (2021) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-021-06505-1 · Cited by 13
Lo, S. H., Gorni, K., Sutherland, C. S., Martí, Y., Lloyd, A. J., & Paracha, N. (2021) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-021-01092-9 · Cited by 12
Self-citationSigurdson, S. S., Harrison, M. J., Pearce, A. M., Richardson, H., Zaza, K. O., & Brundage, M. (2022) · Practical Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.prro.2021.08.012 · Cited by 12
Xiao, J., Wang, F., Wang, M., & Ma, Z. (2022) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13439 · Cited by 12
US Privacy Laws Go Against Public Preferences and Impede Public Health and Research: Survey Study
Schmit, C. D., Giannouchos, T. V., Ramezani, M., Zheng, Q., Morrisey, M. A., & Kum, H. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/25266 · Cited by 12
Beaudart, C., Boonen, A. E. R. C. H., Li, N., Bours, S., Goemaere, S., Reginster, J.-Y., Roux, C., McGowan, B., Díez‐Pérez, A., Rizzoli, R., et al. (2022) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-022-06310-4 · Cited by 12
Bruni, C., Heidenreich, S., Duenas, A., Hoffmann‐Vold, A., Gabrielli, A., Allanore, Y., Chatelus, E., Distler, J. H. W., HACHULLA, E., Hsu, V. M., et al. (2022) · Rheumatology · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keac126 · Cited by 13
Cook, N. S., Criner, G. J., Burgel, P., Mycock, K., Gardner, T., Mellor, P., Hallworth, P., Sully, K., Tatlock, S., Klein, B., et al. (2022) · ERJ Open Research · doi:10.1183/23120541.00686-2021 · Cited by 12
Dong, Y., He, Z., Liu, T., Huang, J. V., Zhang, C. J. P., Akinwunmi, B. O., & Ming, W. (2022) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines10060832 · Cited by 13
Fifer, S. J., Ordman, R., Briggs, L., & Cowley, A. (2022) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm12060879 · Cited by 12
A Discrete Choice Analysis Comparing COVID-19 Vaccination Decisions for Children and Adults
Prosser, L. A., Wagner, A. L., Wittenberg, E., Zikmund‐Fisher, B. J., Rose, A. M., & Pike, J. J. (2023) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.53582 · Cited by 12
Self-citationKilambi, V., Johnson, F. R., González, J. M., & Mohamed, A. F. (2014) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2014.09.001 · Cited by 12
Self-citationWhat students want: using a choice modelling approach to estimate student demand
Sheppard, P., & Smith, R. (2016) · Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management · doi:10.1080/1360080x.2016.1150236 · Cited by 12
Discrete-choice modelling of patient preferences for modes of drug administration
Tetteh, E. K., Stephen Morris, A., & Titchener-Hooker, N. J. (2017) · Health Economics Review · doi:10.1186/s13561-017-0162-6 · Cited by 12
Vanniyasingam, T., Daly, C., Jin, X., Zhang, Y., Foster, G., Cunningham, C. E., & Thabane, L. (2018) · Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications · doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2018.01.002 · Cited by 12
Poulos, C. M., Kinter, E. T., van Beek, J., Christensen, K., & Posner, J. (2018) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462318000491 · Cited by 12
Kim, H., Dowdy, D. W., Martinson, N. A., Kerrigan, D. L., Tudor, C., Golub, J. E., Bridges, J. F. P., & Hanrahan, C. F. (2018) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-018-2324-x · Cited by 12
Self-citationIvanova, J. I., Hess, L. M., García-Horton, V., Graham, S., Liu, X., Zhu, Y. E., & Nicol, S. J. (2019) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-019-00355-0 · Cited by 12
Russell, B. J., Vogrin, S., Philip, J. A. M., Anderson, N. H., Collins, A., Burchell, J., Le, B. H. C., Brand, C. A., Hudson, P., & Sundararajan, V. (2019) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.08.009 · Cited by 12
Babac, A., Damm, K., & von der Schulenburg, J. G. (2019) · Health Economics Review · doi:10.1186/s13561-019-0251-9 · Cited by 12
Understanding Patients’ Preferences for Referrals to Specialists for an Asymptomatic Condition
Dunlea, R., & Lenert, L. A. (2015) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x14566640 · Cited by 13
Hemodialysis patients’ preferences for the management of secondary hyperparathyroidism
Hauber, B., Caloyeras, J. P., Posner, J., Brommage, D., Belozeroff, V., & Cooper, K. (2017) · BMC Nephrology · doi:10.1186/s12882-017-0665-8 · Cited by 12
Ong, A. K. S., Prasetyo, Y. T., Lagura, F. C., Ramos, R. N., Salazar, J. M. L., Sigua, K. M., Villas, J. A., Chuenyindee, T., Nadlifatin, R., Persada, S. F., et al. (2022) · Public Health in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.puhip.2022.100300 · Cited by 15
Wang, C., Gu, Y., Zhao, L., Zhang, Y., Zhou, R., Gu, M., & Wang, L. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053277 · Cited by 11
Brinkmann, M., Fricke, L. M., Diedrich, L., Robra, B., Krauth, C., & Dreier, M. (2022) · Health Economics Review · doi:10.1186/s13561-022-00394-8 · Cited by 11
Fairchild, A. O., Reed, S. D., & González, J. M. (2022) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x221132266 · Cited by 13
Veldwijk, J., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Juhaeri, J., van Overbeeke, E., Tcherny‐Lessenot, S., Pinto, C. A., DiSantostefano, R. L., & Groothuis‐Oudshoorn, C. G. M. (2022) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2022.11.019 · Cited by 12
Lv, Y., Qin, J.-Z., Feng, X., Li, S., Tang, C., & Wang, H. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072495 · Cited by 11
McKibben, N. S., Marchand, L. S., Demyanovich, H. K., Healey, K. M., Zingas, N. H., O’Connor, K., Slobogean, G. P., O’Toole, R. V., & O’Hara, N. N. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072583 · Cited by 11
Patient preferences in treatment options of ulcerative colitis: a discrete choice experiment
Straatmijer, T., Marle, M. E. V. D. A., Ponsioen, C. Y., van der Horst, D., Scherpenzeel, M., Duijvestein, M., & Jong, A. E. V. D. M. (2023) · Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1080/00365521.2023.2286191 · Cited by 11
Bullen, A., Ryan, M., Ennis, H., Gray, E., Loría‐Rebolledo, L. E., McIntyre, M., & Hall, P. S. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076798 · Cited by 11
The impacts of packaging on preferences for cannabis edibles: A discrete choice experiment
Cooper, M., & Shi, Y. (2024) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104453 · Cited by 11
Patient preferences and willingness to pay for dental services: a systematic review
Shahkoohi, A. N., Alipour, V., Arabloo, J., & Meshkani, Z. S. (2025) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-025-05520-6 · Cited by 11
Oakes, A. H., Garmo, V., Bone, L., Longo, D. R., Segal, J. B., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2017) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-017-0248-6 · Cited by 11
Self-citationFalahee, M., Simons, G., DiSantostefano, R. L., Valor, L., Radawski, C., Englbrecht, M., Bywall, K. S., Tcherny‐Lessenot, S., Kihlbom, U., Hauber, B., et al. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045851 · Cited by 11
Morrell, L., Buchanan, J. P., Rees, S., Barker, R., & Wordsworth, S. (2021) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-021-01067-w · Cited by 11
Brouwers, J., Cox, B., Wilder, A. V., Claessens, F., Bruyneel, L., Ridder, D. J. M. K. D., Eeckloo, K., & Vanhaecht, K. (2021) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.10.008 · Cited by 11
Amin, S., Tolaney, S. M., Cambron‐Mellott, M. J., Beusterien, K. M., Maculaitis, M. C., Mulvihill, E., Shinde, R., & McLaurin, K. K. (2022) · Future Oncology · doi:10.2217/fon-2021-0761 · Cited by 11
Bonner, K., Ssekyanzi, H., Sicsic, J., Mueller, J. E., Toomey, T. L., Ulrich, A. K., Horvath, K. J., Neaton, J. D., Banura, C., & Basta, N. E. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0268063 · Cited by 12
Moor, S. E., Tusubira, A. K., Wood, D., Akiteng, A. R., Galusha, D. H., Tessier‐Sherman, B., Hsieh, E., Ngaruiya, C., Rabin, T. L., Hawley, N. L., et al. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059949 · Cited by 11
Darrudi, A., Daroudi, R., Yunesian, M., & Sari, A. A. (2022) · PharmacoEconomics - Open · doi:10.1007/s41669-022-00359-x · Cited by 11
Yang, M. S., Chao, J., Fillbrunn, M. K., Mallya, U. G., Wang, M., Franke, L., Cohn, L. E., & Kamat, S. (2022) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s365117 · Cited by 11
Tervonen, T., Fox, R., Brooks, A., Sidorenko, T., Boyanova, N., Levitan, B., Hennessy, B., & Phillips-Beyer, A. (2023) · Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical · doi:10.1177/20552173221150370 · Cited by 11
Willems, D., Sayed, C. J., van der Zee, H. H., Ingram, J. R., Hinzpeter, E.-L., Beaudart, C., Evers, S., & Hiligsmann, M. (2023) · Journal of Medical Economics · doi:10.1080/13696998.2023.2194804 · Cited by 11
Kremer, I., Beaudart, C., Simons, J. J. M., Plieger, H., Schroeder, M., & Hiligsmann, M. (2023) · AIDS Care · doi:10.1080/09540121.2023.2240067 · Cited by 12
Raghunandan, R., Howard, K., Ilomäki, J., Hilmer, S. N., Gnjidic, D., & Bell, J. S. (2023) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afad153 · Cited by 11
Berchi, C., Dégieux, P., Halhol, H., Danel, B., Bennani, M., & Philippe, C. (2015) · International Journal of Pharmacy Practice · doi:10.1111/ijpp.12220 · Cited by 12
Hemodialysis patients’ preferences for the management of anemia
Hauber, B., Caloyeras, J. P., Posner, J., Brommage, D., Tzivelekis, S., & Pollock, A. S. (2017) · BMC Nephrology · doi:10.1186/s12882-017-0664-9 · Cited by 12
Treatment Preferences in Germany Differ Among Apheresis Patients with Severe Hypercholesterolemia
Mühlbacher, A. C., Sadler, A., Dippel, F. W., & Juhnke, C. (2018) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-018-0614-9 · Cited by 11
van der Aa, M. J., Paulus, A. T. G., Hiligsmann, M., Maarse, H., & Evers, S. (2018) · INQUIRY The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing · doi:10.1177/0046958017751981 · Cited by 11
Beam, N. K., Dadi, G. B., Rankin, S. H., Weiss, S. J., Cooper, B. A., & Thompson, L. M. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016853 · Cited by 11
Petit, J. M., Loubière, S., Vargas-Moniz, M., Tinland, A., Spinnewijn, F., Greenwood, R. M., Santinello, M., Wolf, J., Bokszczanin, A., Bernad, R., et al. (2018) · Archives of Public Health · doi:10.1186/s13690-018-0317-x · Cited by 13
Eliciting e-leadership style and trait preference among nurses via conjoint analysis
Orte, C. J. S., & Diño, M. J. S. (2019) · Enfermería Clínica · doi:10.1016/j.enfcli.2018.11.025 · Cited by 11
Nittas, V., Mütsch, M., & Puhan, M. A. (2020) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/16087 · Cited by 10
Fernandes, Ó. B., Péntek, M., Kringos, D. S., Klazinga, N., Gulàcsi, L., & Baji, P. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0235165 · Cited by 11
Chan, S. J., Yeo, H. Y., Stamp, L. K., Treharne, G. J., & Marra, C. A. (2020) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-020-00488-7 · Cited by 11
Preferences of Canadian Patients and Physicians for Treatment of HR+/HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer
Stellato, D., Thabane, M. E., Eichten, C., & Delea, T. E. (2021) · Current Oncology · doi:10.3390/curroncol28010051 · Cited by 12
Karimi, M., van der Zwaan, L. G. L., Islam, M. K., van Genabeek, J., & Mölken, M. R. (2021) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2021.02.007 · Cited by 11
Neurotization Preferences in Smile Reanimation: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Dusseldorp, J. R., Naunheim, M. R., Quatela, O. E., Fortier, E., Hadlock, T. A., & Jowett, N. (2021) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000008302 · Cited by 11
Fotheringham, J., Vilar, E., Bansal, T., Laboi, P., Davenport, A., Dunn, L., & Hole, A. R. (2021) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.09.012 · Cited by 11
Preferences of Older People With a Life-Limiting Illness: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Johnston, B. M., Daveson, B. A., Normand, C. E. M., Ryan, K., Smith, M., McQuillan, R., Higginson, I. J., Selman, L. E., & Tobin, K. (2022) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.04.180 · Cited by 11
Dobischok, S., Metcalfe, R., Matzinger, E., Palis, H., Marchand, K., Harrison, S., Macdonald, S., Byres, D., Schechter, M. T., Bansback, N. J., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103948 · Cited by 11
Bray, N., Yeo, S. T., Noyes, J., Harris, N. D., & Edwards, R. T. (2016) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-016-0074-y · Cited by 11
Valuing Individuals’ Preferences and Health Choices of Physical Exercise
Aboagye, E. (2017) · Pain and Therapy · doi:10.1007/s40122-017-0067-4 · Cited by 12
Art and Science of Instrument Development for Stated-Preference Methods
Janssen, E. M., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2017) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-017-0261-9 · Cited by 11
Self-citationAn Assessment of Public Preferences for Newborn Screening Using Best–Worst Scaling
Tarini, B. A., Simon, N.-J., Payne, K., Gebremariam, A., Rose, A. M., & Prosser, L. A. (2018) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.05.035 · Cited by 11
Self-citationJayadevappa, R., Chhatre, S., Gallo, J. J., Malkowicz, S. B., Schwartz, J. S., & Wittink, M. N. (2019) · MDM Policy & Practice · doi:10.1177/2381468319855375 · Cited by 11
Coursey, K., Muralidhar, K., Srinivas, V., Jaykrishna, P., Begum, F., Ningaiah, N., Lee, S.-J., & Madhivanan, P. (2024) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-024-19485-8 · Cited by 10
“While conjoint analysis has been previously applied to vaccine and other biomedical research, [29–32] it has not been used to assess HPV vaccine acceptability in India.”
MethodHawke, L. D., Thabane, L., Iyer, S. N., Jaouich, A., Reaume-Zimmer, P., & Henderson, J. (2021) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-021-07038-3 · Cited by 14
Public Valuation of Direct Restorations: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Bailey, O., Stone, S. J., Ternent, L., & Vernazza, C. R. (2022) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/00220345221108699 · Cited by 10
Li, X., Yang, L., Tian, G., Feng, B., Jia, X., He, Z., Liu, T., Zhao, X., Huang, M., Yu, W., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1067218 · Cited by 10
Govathson, C., Long, L. C., Moolla, A., Mngadi-Ncube, S., Ngcobo, N., Mongwenyana, C., Lince-Deroche, N., & Pascoe, S. J. S. (2023) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-023-10414-w · Cited by 11
Fifer, S. J., Godsell, J., Opat, S., Hamad, N., Lasica, M., Forsyth, C. J., Morand, L., Smeaton, E., Winton, S., Puig, A., et al. (2024) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-024-12589-9 · Cited by 11
Patient preferences for long-acting HIV treatment: a preference heterogeneity assessment
Saldarriaga, E. M., Hauber, B., Barthold, D., Brah, A. T., Tran, J., Marconi, V. C., Simoni, J. M., & Graham, S. M. (2025) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/s12879-025-10546-w · Cited by 11
McGrady, M. E., Prosser, L. A., Thompson, A. N., & Pai, A. L. H. (2017) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsx104 · Cited by 10
Self-citationHollin, I. L., González, J. M., Buelt, L., Ciarametaro, M., & Dubois, R. W. (2020) · MDM Policy & Practice · doi:10.1177/2381468320928012 · Cited by 10
Chhatre, S., Newman, D. K., Wein, A. J., & Jayadevappa, R. (2021) · Neurourology and Urodynamics · doi:10.1002/nau.24618 · Cited by 10
Suzuki, K., Grillo, V., Chen, Y., Singh, S., & Ledesma, D. A. (2021) · JCO Global Oncology · doi:10.1200/go.20.00358 · Cited by 10
Michaels-Igbokwe, C., Currie, G. R., Kennedy, B. L., MacDonald, K. V., & Marshall, D. A. (2021) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-021-00519-x · Cited by 10
Self-citationDorgali, M. V., Longo, A., Vass, C., Shields, G., Harrison, R. S., Riccardo Scarpa, A., & Boeri, M. (2021) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-021-01076-9 · Cited by 10
Saldarriaga, E. M., Hauber, B., Carlson, J. J., Barthold, D., Veenstra, D. L., & Devine, B. (2021) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2021.09.016 · Cited by 10
Rieger, E., Prasetya, K., Christensen, B. K., & Shou, Y. (2021) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.23634 · Cited by 10
Stone, R. L., Cambron‐Mellott, M. J., Beusterien, K. M., Maculaitis, M. C., Ritz, S., Mulvihill, E., Monberg, M., Szamreta, E. A., Amin, S., & McLaurin, K. K. (2021) · Future Oncology · doi:10.2217/fon-2021-0567 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Bridges, J. F. P., Hauber, A. B., Marshall, D., Lloyd, A., Prosser, L. A., Regier, D. A., Johnson, F. R., & Mauskopf, J.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- University of Calgary (CA)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
- RTI Health Solutions (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bridges, John F.P.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Value in Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 403-413
- ISSN
- 1098-3015 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121619367
- Cited by
- 2,029
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 184 · 2025: 199 · 2024: 217 · 2023: 178 · 2022: 213 · 2021: 195 · 2020: 158 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 124 · 2016: 84 · 2015: 91 · 2014: 77 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 37
- FWCI
- 134.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Value in Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
- Keywords
- conjoint analysis, discrete choice experiment, stated preference methods, good scientific practice, methodological standards, checklists, preference elicitation, experimental design, ISPOR
- MeSH terms
- Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Research Design, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Economics, Pharmaceutical, Advisory Committees, Internationality, Checklist, Research Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
