The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health—a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force
Open accessAbstract
Background The application of conjoint analysis (including discrete-choice experiments and other multiattribute stated-preference methods) in health has increased rapidly over the past decade. A wider acceptance of these methods is limited by an absence of consensus-based methodological standards.Objective The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force was established to identify good research practices for conjoint-analysis applications in health.Methods The task force met regularly to identify the important steps in a conjoint analysis, to discuss good research practices for conjoint analysis, and to develop and refine the key criteria for identifying good research practices. ISPOR members contributed to this process through an extensive consultation process. A final consensus meeting was held to revise the article using these comments, and those of a number of international reviewers.Results Task force findings are presented as a 10-item checklist covering: 1) research question; 2) attributes and levels; 3) construction of tasks; 4) experimental design; 5) preference elicitation; 6) instrument design; 7) data-collection plan; 8) statistical analyses; 9) results and conclusions; and 10) study presentation. A primary question relating to each of the 10 items is posed, and three sub-questions examine finer issues within items.Conclusions Although the checklist should not be interpreted as endorsing any specific methodological approach to conjoint analysis, it can facilitate future training activities and discussions of good research practices for the application of conjoint-analysis methods in health care studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“While conjoint analysis has been previously applied to vaccine and other biomedical research, [29–32] it has not been used to assess HPV vaccine acceptability in India.”
From Acceptability of HPV vaccination for cervical cancer prevention amongst emerging adult women in rural Mysore, India: a mixed-methods study (2024) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We followed recommended guidelines to design and implement the DCE. [7, 8, 11–16]”
From Assessing the American public's preferences for reforms to teen driving licensure systems: a discrete choice experiment (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“A survey containing a DCE was developed and administered according to best practice guidelines [26].”
From Consumer preferences for teledermoscopy screening to detect melanoma early (2016) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“In recent years, DCEs have been increasingly used in health and health care settings [9,10], as well as in addiction research [11] and digital health [4-6].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., Swait́, J., & Adamowicz, W. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753831 · Cited by 7,008
Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., & Erikson, P. (2005) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x · Cited by 5,521
Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2008) · Cited by 5,345
Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook
Green, P. E., & Srinivasan, V. (1978) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208721 · Cited by 3,165
Applied choice analysis a primer
Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2005) · Cited by 2,619
Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making: A User??s Guide
Lancsar, E., & Louviere, J. (2008) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004 · Cited by 1,707
Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research
Orme, B. K. (2005) · Cited by 1,082
The Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Choice Designs
Huber, J. C., & Zwerina, K. (1996) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379603300305 · Cited by 1,023
Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care
Ryan, M. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1530 · Cited by 942
Mauskopf, J., Sullivan, S. D., Annemans, L., Jaime, J., Mullins, C. D., Nuijten, M. J. C., Orlewska, E., Watkins, J., & Trueman, P. (2007) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00187.x · Cited by 752
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Chong, 2007, Do clinical practice guidelines incorporate evidence on patient preferences?, Med Decis Making, 27, E63
- Bridges, 2010, Common avoidance and determinants of demand for male circumcision in Johannesburg, South Africa, Health Policy Plan
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,001
Patient and physician preferences for atopic dermatitis injection treatments in Japan
Okubo, Y., Ho, K.-A., Fifer, S. J., Fujita, H., Oki, Y., & Taguchi, Y. (2019) · Journal of Dermatological Treatment · doi:10.1080/09546634.2019.1623860 · Cited by 35
Patient preferences for maintenance therapy in Crohn’s disease: A discrete-choice experiment
Hazlewood, G. S., Pokharel, G., Deardon, R., Marshall, D. A., Bombardier, C., TOMLINSON, G. A., Ma, C., Seow, C. H., Panaccione, R., & Kaplan, G. G. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227635 · Cited by 33
Self-citationBywall, K. S., Kihlbom, U., HANSSON, M. G., Falahee, M., Raza, K., Baecklund, E., & Veldwijk, J. (2020) · Arthritis Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13075-020-02391-w · Cited by 34
Attributes Used for Cancer Screening Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review
Hall, R., Medina‐Lara, A., Hamilton, W. T., & Spencer, A. E. (2021) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-021-00559-3 · Cited by 33
Patients’ Preferences Related to Benefits, Risks, and Formulations of Schizophrenia Treatment
Levitan, B. S., Markowitz, M., Mohamed, A. F., Johnson, F. R., Alphs, L. D., Citrome, L., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2015) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201400188 · Cited by 33
Self-citationCriteria and Process for Initiating and Developing an ISPOR Good Practices Task Force Report
Malone, D. C., Ramsey, S. D., Patrick, D. L., Johnson, F. R., Mullins, C. D., Roberts, M. S., Willke, R. J., & Marshall, D. A. (2020) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2020.03.001 · Cited by 32
Self-citationKandzari, D. E., Weber, M. A., Poulos, C. M., Coulter, J., Cohen, S. A., DeBruin, V., Jones, D. E., & Pathak, A. (2022) · Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · doi:10.1161/circoutcomes.122.008997 · Cited by 32
Differences between physician and patient preferences for cancer treatments: a systematic review
Zhang, M., He, X., Wu, J. H., & Xie, F. (2023) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-023-11598-4 · Cited by 37
Nafees, B., Lloyd, A. J., Ziani, E., Nicolas, L., Soubeyrand, B., Bornhöft, C., & Fordham, B. (2015) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s87229 · Cited by 32
Self-citationFoote, C., Morton, R. L., Jardine, M., Gallagher, M., Brown, M. A., Howard, K., & Cass, A. (2014) · Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfu257 · Cited by 31
Poulos, C. M., Kinter, E. T., Yang, J., Bridges, J. F. P., Posner, J., Gleißner, E., Mühlbacher, A. C., & Kieseier, B. C. (2016) · Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders · doi:10.1177/1756285615622736 · Cited by 32
Self-citationQin, L., Chen, S., Flood, E. M., Shaunik, A., Romero, B., de la Cruz, M., Alvarez, C., & Grandy, S. (2017) · Diabetes Therapy · doi:10.1007/s13300-017-0237-8 · Cited by 32
Feldman, S. R., Régnier, S. A., Chirilov, A., Hey, F., Gilloteau, I., & Cella, D. F. (2019) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.01.039 · Cited by 32
Sun, H., Wang, H., Xu, N., Li, J., Shi, J., Zhou, N., Ni, M., Hu, X., & Chen, Y. (2019) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s224529 · Cited by 32
Shields, G., Brown, L., Adrian Wells, A., Capobianco, L., & Vass, C. (2020) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-020-00439-2 · Cited by 31
Ferreira, G. E., Howard, K., Zadro, J. R., O’Keeffe, M., Lin, C. C., & Maher, C. G. (2020) · Journal of physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2020.09.011 · Cited by 32
Patient Preferences for Waiting Time and Kidney Quality
Mehrotra, S., González, J. M., Schantz, K., Yang, J., Friedewald, J. J., & Knight, R. (2022) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.01480222 · Cited by 32
Patient Preferences for a Polypill for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases
Laba, T., Howard, K., Rose, J. M., Peiris, D., Redfern, J., Usherwood, T. P., Cass, A., Patel, A. A., & Jan, S. (2015) · Annals of Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1177/1060028015570468 · Cited by 32
Streufert, B. D., Reed, S. D., Orlando, L. A., Taylor, D. C., Huber, J. C., & Mather, R. C. “. (2017) · Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/2325967117695788 · Cited by 32
Lewis, M. A., Stine, A., Paquin, R. S., Mansfield, C. A., Wood, D., Rini, C. K., Roche, M. I., Powell, C. M., Berg, J. S., & Bailey, D. B. (2017) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/gim.2017.93 · Cited by 32
Burnett, H. F., Regier, D. A., Feldman, B. M., Miller, F. A., & Ungar, W. J. (2012) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.21698 · Cited by 35
Self-citationOzawa, S., Grewal, S. K., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2016) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.1007/s40258-016-0222-9 · Cited by 31
Self-citationMartinez, E., Solé, J. M. N., Rodríguez, M. V., Martín-Mola, E., Raya, E., Ibero, I., Nocea, G., Aragón, B., Lizán, L., & Prades, M. (2016) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s106311 · Cited by 31
Katz, E. G., Hauber, B., Gopal, S., Fairchild, A., Pugh, A., Weinstein, R. B., & Levitan, B. S. (2016) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s114172 · Cited by 31
Kohler, R. E., Gopal, S., Lee, C. N., Weiner, B. J., Reeve, B. B., & Wheeler, S. B. (2017) · Journal of Global Oncology · doi:10.1200/jgo.2016.005371 · Cited by 31
Adolescent values for immunisation programs in Australia: A discrete choice experiment
Wang, B., Chen, G., Ratcliffe, J., Afzali, H. H. A., Giles, L. C., & Marshall, H. S. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181073 · Cited by 31
de Freitas, H. M., Ito, T., Hadi, M., Al-Jassar, G., Henry-Szatkowski, M., Nafees, B., & Lloyd, A. J. (2019) · Advances in Therapy · doi:10.1007/s12325-018-0861-3 · Cited by 31
Self-citationWilliams, C., Gallagher, K. D., Deehr, K., Aswani, M. S., Azuero, A., Daniel, C. L., Ford, E. W., Ingram, S. A., Balch, A. J., & Rocque, G. B. (2020) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.33287 · Cited by 31
Chachoua, L., Dabbous, M., François, C., Dussart, C., Aballéa, S., & Toumi, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2020.543046 · Cited by 31
Maculaitis, M. C., Liu, X., Will, O., Hanson, M., McRoy, L., Berk, A. R., & Crastnopol, M. (2020) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s254934 · Cited by 32
The Demand for Season of Birth
Clarke, D., Oreffice, S., & Quintana‐Domeque, C. (2016) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.2711 · Cited by 32
Krauth, C., Oedingen, C., Bartling, T., Dreier, M., Spura, A., Bock, F. D., von Rüden, U., Betsch, C., Korn, L., & Robra, B. (2021) · International Journal of Public Health · doi:10.3389/ijph.2021.591027 · Cited by 32
Preferences of the Public for Sharing Health Data: Discrete Choice Experiment
Johansson, J. V., Bentzen, H. B., Shah, N., Haraldsdóttir, E., Jónsdóttir, G. A., Kaye, J. S., Mascalzoni, D., & Veldwijk, J. (2021) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/29614 · Cited by 31
Dean, L. T., Predmore, Z., Skinner, A., Napoleon, S. C., Chan, P. A., & Raifman, J. (2023) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-023-03986-5 · Cited by 31
Livingstone, K. M., Abbott, G., Lamb, K. E., Dullaghan, K., Worsley, A. F., & McNaughton, S. A. (2021) · Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/nxab106 · Cited by 30
Jiang, M., Xiao, M.-F., Zhang, J.-W., & Yang, M. (2024) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-023-01696-w · Cited by 30
Hofman, R., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Raat, H., Helmerhorst, T. J. M., van Ballegooijen, M., & Korfage, I. J. (2014) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-454 · Cited by 30
González, J. M., Johnson, F. R., McAteer, H., Posner, J., & Mughal, F. (2016) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.14798 · Cited by 30
Self-citationFeldman, S. R., Moeller, A. H., & Erntoft, S. (2016) · Journal of health economics and outcomes research · doi:10.36469/9817 · Cited by 30
González, J. M., Doan, J. F., Gebben, D., Boeri, M., & Fishman, M. (2018) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-018-0640-7 · Cited by 30
Allocating healthcare resources to genomic testing in Canada: latest evidence and current challenges
Weymann, D., Dragojlovic, N., Pollard, S., & Regier, D. A. (2019) · Journal of Community Genetics · doi:10.1007/s12687-019-00428-5 · Cited by 30
Self-citationStated-preference research in HIV: A scoping review
Humphrey, J. M., Yebei, V. N., MacDonald, K. R., Wools‐Kaloustian, K., & Zimet, G. D. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0224566 · Cited by 31
Trust and Trade-Offs in Sharing Data for Precision Medicine: A National Survey of Singapore
Lysaght, T., Ballantyne, A., Toh, H. J., Lau, A. W. T., Ong, S. A. K., Schaefer, G. O., Shiraishi, M., van den Boom, W., Xafis, V., & Tai, E. S. (2021) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm11090921 · Cited by 30
Sydenham, R. V., Jarbøl, D. E., Hansen, M. P., Justesen, U. S., Watson, V., & Pedersen, L. B. (2022) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115033 · Cited by 30
Dong, D., Özdemir, S., Bee, Y. M., Toh, S.-A. E. S., Bilger, M., & Finkelstein, E. A. (2016) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2016.03.1837 · Cited by 30
Shah, K. K., Tsuchiya, A., & Wailoo, A. (2018) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.03.010 · Cited by 31
An introduction to “discrete choice experiments” for behavior analysts
Friedel, J. E., Foreman, A. M., & Wirth, O. (2022) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2022.104628 · Cited by 29
Biasiotto, R., Johansson, J. V., Alemu, M. B., Romano, V., Bentzen, H. B., Kaye, J. S., Ancillotti, M., Blom, J. M. C., Chassang, G., Hallinan, D., et al. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/47066 · Cited by 31
Discrete-choice experiments versus rating scale exercises to evaluate the importance of attributes
Wijnen, B. F. M., van der Putten, I. M., Groothuis, S., de Kinderen, R. J. A., Noben, C. Y. G., Paulus, A. T. G., Ramaekers, B. L. T., Vogel, G., & Hiligsmann, M. (2015) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1586/14737167.2015.1033406 · Cited by 29
Health-related quality of life in Parkinson’s: impact of ‘off’ time and stated treatment preferences
Kerr, C., Lloyd, E. J., Kosmas, C. E., Smith, H. T., Cooper, J. A., Johnston, K., McIntosh, E., & Lloyd, A. J. (2015) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-015-1187-0 · Cited by 29
Self-citationPeyron, C., Pélissier, A., & Béjean, S. (2018) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.015 · Cited by 34
McGrady, M. E., Pai, A. L. H., & Prosser, L. A. (2020) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2020.1715813 · Cited by 32
Self-citationPaul, S. S., Canning, C. G., Löfgren, N., Sherrington, C., Lee, D. C., Bampton, J., & Howard, K. (2020) · Journal of physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2020.12.007 · Cited by 31
Buchanan, J. P., Roope, L. S. J., Morrell, L., Pouwels, K. B., Robotham, J. V., Abel, L., Crook, D. W., Peto, T., Butler, C., Walker, A. S., et al. (2021) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.1007/s40258-021-00642-8 · Cited by 31
Patient preferences for chemotherapies used in breast cancer
Beusterien, K., Grinspan, Tencer, Brufsky, A., & Visovsky (2012) · International Journal of Women s Health · doi:10.2147/ijwh.s31331 · Cited by 29
Segmenting Patients and Physicians Using Preferences from Discrete Choice Experiments
Deal, K. (2013) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-013-0037-9 · Cited by 29
Cunningham, C. E., Rimas, H. L., Chen, Y., Deal, K., McGrath, P. J., Lingley‐Pottie, P., Reid, G. J., Lipman, E. L., & Corkum, P. V. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1080/15374416.2014.888666 · Cited by 29
Hill, M. K., Suri, R., Nash, E. F., Stephen Morris, A., & Chitty, L. S. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm3010176 · Cited by 28
Optimizing Electronic Release of Imaging Results through an Online Patient Portal
Woolen, S. A., Kazerooni, E. A., Steenburg, S. D., Nan, B., Ma, T., Wall, A., Linna, N. B., Gayed, M. J., Kushdilian, M. V., Parent, K., et al. (2018) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2018180883 · Cited by 29
Quaife, M., Eakle, R., Cabrera, M., Vickerman, P. T., Tsepe, M., Cianci, F., Delany‐Moretlwe, S., & Terris‐Prestholt, F. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010682 · Cited by 28
Husni, M. E., Betts, K. A., Griffith, J. M., Song, Y., & Ganguli, A. X. (2017) · Rheumatology International · doi:10.1007/s00296-017-3760-z · Cited by 28
Sun, H., Wang, H., Shi, L., Wang, M., Li, J., Shi, J., Ni, M., Hu, X., & Chen, Y. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032336 · Cited by 28
Optimising HPV vaccination communication to adolescents: A discrete choice experiment
Chyderiotis, S., Sicsic, J., Raude, J., Bonmarin, I., Jeanleboeuf, F., Banaszuk, A.-S., Gauchet, A., Bruel, S., Michel, M., Giraudeau, B., et al. (2021) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.061 · Cited by 28
Job preferences of undergraduate pharmacy students in China: a discrete choice experiment
Liu, P., Liu, S., Gong, T., Li, Q., Chen, G., & Li, S. (2021) · Human Resources for Health · doi:10.1186/s12960-021-00626-8 · Cited by 28
Willems, D., Hiligsmann, M., van der Zee, H. H., Sayed, C. J., & Evers, S. (2021) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-021-00539-7 · Cited by 28
Realizing the economic and circular potential of sharing business models by engaging consumers
Bruyne, M.-J. D., & Verleye, K. (2022) · Journal of service management · doi:10.1108/josm-08-2021-0318 · Cited by 31
Tribaldos, M., Morillas, C., Feliciano, R., Catalina, P. F., Ponte, C., Botella, M., Rodrigues, J., Esmatjes, E., Tejedor, J. L., Lizán, L., et al. (2015) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s88022 · Cited by 27
Exploring consumer preferences in cloud archiving – a student's perspective
Burda, D., & Teuteberg, F. (2015) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2015.1012650 · Cited by 28
Marshall, D. A., González, J. M., Johnson, F. R., MacDonald, K. V., Pugh, A., Douglas, M. P., & Phillips, K. A. (2016) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/gim.2016.61 · Cited by 28
Self-citationPatient Preferences for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction
Shammas, R. L., Hung, A., Mullikin, A., Sergesketter, A. R., Lee, C. N., Reed, S. D., Fish, L. J., Greenup, R. A., & Hollenbeck, S. T. (2023) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2023.4432 · Cited by 27
Seo, J., Smith, B. D., Estey, E. H., Voyard, E., Donoghue, B. O., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2018) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1080/03007995.2018.1456414 · Cited by 27
Self-citationMeasuring stroke patients’ exercise preferences using a discrete choice experiment
Geidl, W., Knocke, K., Schupp, W., & Pfeifer, K. (2018) · Neurology International · doi:10.4081/ni.2018.6993 · Cited by 27
Public preferences for primary care provision in Germany – a discrete choice experiment
Krinke, K.-S., Tangermann, U., Amelung, V. E., & Krauth, C. (2019) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-019-0967-y · Cited by 28
Mott, D. J., Chami, N., & Tervonen, T. (2020) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2020.04.1831 · Cited by 27
Livingstone, K. M., Lamb, K. E., Abbott, G., Worsley, T., & McNaughton, S. A. (2020) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-020-01059-7 · Cited by 29
Goranitis, I., Best, S., Christodoulou, J., Boughtwood, T. F., & Stark, Z. (2021) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41431-021-00874-1 · Cited by 29
Preferences of psychotherapists for blended care in Germany: a discrete choice experiment
Phillips, E. A., Himmler, S., & Schreyögg, J. (2022) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-022-03765-x · Cited by 35
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and vaccine passports: a cross-sectional conjoint experiment in Japan
Okamoto, S., Kamimura, K., & Komamura, K. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060829 · Cited by 26
Treatment preferences among patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis
Myers, K., Silverberg, J. I., Parasuraman, S. V., Pierce, A., Eichenfield, L. F., & Poulos, C. M. (2023) · Journal of Dermatological Treatment · doi:10.1080/09546634.2023.2215356 · Cited by 27
Psoriasis patients’ willingness to accept side-effect risks for improved treatment efficacy
Kauf, T. L., Yang, J., Kimball, A. B., Sundaram, M., Bao, Y., Okun, M. M., Mulani, P. M., Hauber, B., & Johnson, F. R. (2015) · Journal of Dermatological Treatment · doi:10.3109/09546634.2015.1034071 · Cited by 28
Self-citationProviding Informal Care in Terminal Illness
Hall, J. P., Kenny, P. M., Hossain, I., Street, D. J., & Knox, S. A. (2013) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x13500719 · Cited by 27
Boone, D., Mallett, S., Zhu, S.-H., Yao, G., Bell, N., Ghanouni, A., von Wagner, C., Taylor, S., Altman, D., Lilford, R., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080767 · Cited by 23
Spinks, J., Chaboyer, W. P., Bucknall, T. K., Tobiano, G., & Whitty, J. A. (2015) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008941 · Cited by 27
What criteria do decision makers in Thailand use to set priorities for vaccine introduction?
Pooripussarakul, S., Riewpaiboon, A., Bishai, D. M., Muangchana, C., & Tantivess, S. (2016) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3382-5 · Cited by 27
Patient and Oncology Nurse Preferences for the Treatment Options in Advanced Melanoma
Liu, F. X., Witt, E. A., Ebbinghaus, S., Beyer, G. D., Basurto, E., & Joseph, R. W. (2017) · Cancer Nursing · doi:10.1097/ncc.0000000000000557 · Cited by 27
Harris, C. A., Shauver, M. J., Yuan, F., Nasser, J. S., & Chung, K. C. (2018) · The Journal Of Hand Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.03.001 · Cited by 27
Janssen, E. M., Benz, H. L., Tsai, J.-H., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2018) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1080/17434440.2018.1470505 · Cited by 27
Self-citationSpaich, S., Kinder, J., Hetjens, S., Fuxius, S., Gerhardt, A., & Sütterlin, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2018.00535 · Cited by 27
Evaluating Migraineurs' Preferences for Migraine Treatment Outcomes Using a Choice Experiment
González, J. M., Johnson, F. R., Runken, M. C., & Poulos, C. M. (2013) · Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain · doi:10.1111/head.12142 · Cited by 26
Self-citationWittenberg, E., Bharel, M., Saada, A., Santiago, E. R., Bridges, J. F. P., & Weinreb, L. (2015) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-014-0110-z · Cited by 26
Self-citationDanner, M., & Gerber‐Grote, A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-4068-9_11 · Cited by 26
Outcome Priorities for Older Persons With Sarcopenia
Hiligsmann, M., Beaudart, C., Bruyère, O., Biver, E., Bauer, J. M., Cruz-Jentoft, A. J., Gesmundo, A., Goisser, S., Landi, F., Locquet, M., et al. (2019) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2019.08.026 · Cited by 26
Today's doctors: What do men and women value in a training post?
Scanlan, G. M., Johnston, P. W., Walker, K. A., Skåtun, D., & Cleland, J. (2020) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.14151 · Cited by 26
Fifer, S. J., Galinsky, J., & Richard, S. (2020) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s259612 · Cited by 26
Rural Development and Rural Tourism: The Impact of Infrastructure Investments
de Almeida, A. M. M., & Machado, L. P. (2021) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.95610 · Cited by 31
A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analysis on Genetic Testing
Özdemir, S., Lee, J. J., Chaudhry, I., & Ocampo, R. R. Q. (2021) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-021-00531-1 · Cited by 26
Abuya, T., Mwanga, D. M., Obadha, M., Ndwiga, C., Odwe, G., Kavoo, D., Wanyugu, J., Warren, C., & Agarwal, S. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048059 · Cited by 37
von Wedel, P., & Hagist, C. (2022) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-022-07769-x · Cited by 26
Coxon, D., Frisher, M., Jinks, C., Jordan, K. P., Paskins, Z., & Peat, G. (2015) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009625 · Cited by 30
Makkar, S. R., Williamson, A. B., Turner, T., Redman, S., & Louviere, J. J. (2015) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0013-z · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Bridges, J. F. P., Hauber, A. B., Marshall, D., Lloyd, A., Prosser, L. A., Regier, D. A., Johnson, F. R., & Mauskopf, J.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- University of Calgary (CA)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
- RTI Health Solutions (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bridges, John F.P.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Value in Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 403-413
- ISSN
- 1098-3015 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121619367
- Cited by
- 2,029
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 184 · 2025: 199 · 2024: 217 · 2023: 178 · 2022: 213 · 2021: 195 · 2020: 158 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 124 · 2016: 84 · 2015: 91 · 2014: 77 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 37
- FWCI
- 134.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Value in Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
- Keywords
- conjoint analysis, discrete choice experiment, stated preference methods, good scientific practice, methodological standards, checklists, preference elicitation, experimental design, ISPOR
- MeSH terms
- Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Research Design, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Economics, Pharmaceutical, Advisory Committees, Internationality, Checklist, Research Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
