The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health—a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force
Open accessAbstract
Background The application of conjoint analysis (including discrete-choice experiments and other multiattribute stated-preference methods) in health has increased rapidly over the past decade. A wider acceptance of these methods is limited by an absence of consensus-based methodological standards.Objective The International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force was established to identify good research practices for conjoint-analysis applications in health.Methods The task force met regularly to identify the important steps in a conjoint analysis, to discuss good research practices for conjoint analysis, and to develop and refine the key criteria for identifying good research practices. ISPOR members contributed to this process through an extensive consultation process. A final consensus meeting was held to revise the article using these comments, and those of a number of international reviewers.Results Task force findings are presented as a 10-item checklist covering: 1) research question; 2) attributes and levels; 3) construction of tasks; 4) experimental design; 5) preference elicitation; 6) instrument design; 7) data-collection plan; 8) statistical analyses; 9) results and conclusions; and 10) study presentation. A primary question relating to each of the 10 items is posed, and three sub-questions examine finer issues within items.Conclusions Although the checklist should not be interpreted as endorsing any specific methodological approach to conjoint analysis, it can facilitate future training activities and discussions of good research practices for the application of conjoint-analysis methods in health care studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“While conjoint analysis has been previously applied to vaccine and other biomedical research, [29–32] it has not been used to assess HPV vaccine acceptability in India.”
From Acceptability of HPV vaccination for cervical cancer prevention amongst emerging adult women in rural Mysore, India: a mixed-methods study (2024) · cites this paper as [29]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We followed recommended guidelines to design and implement the DCE. [7, 8, 11–16]”
From Assessing the American public's preferences for reforms to teen driving licensure systems: a discrete choice experiment (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“A survey containing a DCE was developed and administered according to best practice guidelines [26].”
From Consumer preferences for teledermoscopy screening to detect melanoma early (2016) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“In recent years, DCEs have been increasingly used in health and health care settings [9,10], as well as in addiction research [11] and digital health [4-6].”
From Understanding Uptake of Digital Health Products: Methodology Tutorial for a Discrete Choice Experiment Using the Bayesian Efficient Design (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., Swait́, J., & Adamowicz, W. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753831 · Cited by 7,008
Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., & Erikson, P. (2005) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x · Cited by 5,521
Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2008) · Cited by 5,345
Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook
Green, P. E., & Srinivasan, V. (1978) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208721 · Cited by 3,165
Applied choice analysis a primer
Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2005) · Cited by 2,619
Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making: A User??s Guide
Lancsar, E., & Louviere, J. (2008) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004 · Cited by 1,707
Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research
Orme, B. K. (2005) · Cited by 1,082
The Importance of Utility Balance in Efficient Choice Designs
Huber, J. C., & Zwerina, K. (1996) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379603300305 · Cited by 1,023
Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care
Ryan, M. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1530 · Cited by 942
Mauskopf, J., Sullivan, S. D., Annemans, L., Jaime, J., Mullins, C. D., Nuijten, M. J. C., Orlewska, E., Watkins, J., & Trueman, P. (2007) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00187.x · Cited by 752
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Chong, 2007, Do clinical practice guidelines incorporate evidence on patient preferences?, Med Decis Making, 27, E63
- Bridges, 2010, Common avoidance and determinants of demand for male circumcision in Johannesburg, South Africa, Health Policy Plan
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,001
Courtright, K. R., Halpern, S. D., Joffe, S., Ellenberg, S. S., Karlawish, J. H., Madden, V. L., Gabler, N. B., Szymanski, S., Yadav, K. N., & Dember, L. M. (2017) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2217-8 · Cited by 15
Rozier, M. D., Singh, S. R., Jacobson, P., & Prosser, L. A. (2018) · Journal of Public Health Management and Practice · doi:10.1097/phh.0000000000000848 · Cited by 15
Self-citationE-cigarette Product Preferences among Adult Smokers: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Shang, C., Weaver, S. R., White, J. S., Huang, J., Nonnemaker, J. M., Cheng, K., & Chaloupka, F. J. (2020) · Tobacco Regulatory Science · doi:10.18001/trs.6.1.7 · Cited by 15
Lewis, H. B., Schroeder, M., Gunsoy, N. B., Janssen, E. M., Llewellyn, S., Doll, H., Jones, P., & Ismaila, A. (2020) · International Journal of COPD · doi:10.2147/copd.s221980 · Cited by 15
Preference of influenza vaccination among the elderly population in Shaanxi province, China
Jiang, M., Li, P., Yao, X., Hayat, K., Gong, Y., Zhu, S., Peng, J., Shi, X., Pu, Z., Huang, Y., et al. (2021) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2021.1913029 · Cited by 15
Johansson, J. V., Shah, N., Haraldsdóttir, E., Bentzen, H. B., Coy, S., Kaye, J. S., Mascalzoni, D., & Veldwijk, J. (2021) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101625 · Cited by 17
Public Preferences for a COVID-19 Vaccination Program in Quebec: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Morillon, G. F., & Poder, T. G. (2022) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-021-01124-4 · Cited by 15
Examining patient and professional perspectives in the UK for gene therapy in haemophilia
Woollacott, I., Morgan, G., Chowdary, P., O’Hara, J., Franks, B., van Overbeeke, E., Dunn, N., Michelsen, S., Huys, I., Martin, A. P., et al. (2022) · Haemophilia · doi:10.1111/hae.14572 · Cited by 15
Buchanan, J., Hill, M. K., Vass, C., Hammond, J., Riedijk, S. R., Klapwijk, J. E., Harding, E., Lou, S., Vogel, I., Hui, L., et al. (2022) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.6159 · Cited by 14
Patient preferences for newer oral therapies in type 2 diabetes
Savarese, G., Sharma, A., Pang, C., Wood, R., & Soleymanlou, N. (2022) · International Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.09.009 · Cited by 18
Wilkinson, G., & Drummond, M. (2015) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1586/17434440.2015.1080118 · Cited by 15
Feig, C., Cheung, K. L., Hiligsmann, M., Evers, S., Simon, J., & Mayer, S. (2017) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1080/14737167.2017.1375407 · Cited by 15
Barnes, J., Stuart, J., Allen, E., Petrou, S., Sturgess, J., Barlow, J., Macdonald, G. M., Spiby, H., Aistrop, D., Melhuish, E. C., et al. (2017) · Public Health Research · doi:10.3310/phr05090 · Cited by 17
What Do Patients Want from Otolaryngologists? A Discrete Choice Experiment
Naunheim, M. R., Rathi, V. K., Naunheim, M. L., Alkire, B. C., Lam, A. C., Song, P. C., & Shrime, M. G. (2017) · Otolaryngology · doi:10.1177/0194599817717662 · Cited by 15
Barber, S., Pavitt, S. H., Khambay, B., Bekker, H., & Meads, D. M. (2018) · JDR Clinical & Translational Research · doi:10.1177/2380084418780324 · Cited by 15
de Jong, L., Plöthner, M., Stahmeyer, J. T., Eberhard, S., Zeidler, J., & Damm, K. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023253 · Cited by 15
Copsey, B. J., Buchanan, J. P., Fitzpatrick, R. M., Lamb, S. E., Dutton, S., & Cook, J. A. (2019) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x19841877 · Cited by 15
Determining patient preferences in a glaucoma service: A discrete choice experiment
Lu, T. C., Angell, B. J., Dunn, H., Ford, B., White, A. J. R., & Keay, L. J. (2019) · Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · doi:10.1111/ceo.13606 · Cited by 17
Joo, W., Almario, C. V., ISHIMORI, M. L., Park, Y., Jusufagic, A., Noah, B. D., Gensler, L. S., Venuturupalli, S., Kay, J., Weisman, M. H., et al. (2020) · ACR Open Rheumatology · doi:10.1002/acr2.11151 · Cited by 15
Roope, L. S. J., Buchanan, J. P., Morrell, L., Pouwels, K. B., Sivyer, K., Mowbray, F., Abel, L., Cross, E. L. A., Yardley, L., Peto, T., et al. (2020) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-020-01660-4 · Cited by 15
Consumers' Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Personalised Nutrition
Pérez-Troncoso, D., Epstein, D., & Castañeda-García, J. (2021) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.1007/s40258-021-00647-3 · Cited by 13
Quality of life and patient preferences: identification of subgroups of multiple sclerosis patients
Rosato, R., Testa, S., Oggero, A., Molinengo, G., & Bertolotto, A. (2015) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-015-0952-4 · Cited by 14
Brinkmann, M., Diedrich, L., Krauth, C., Robra, B.-P., Stahmeyer, J. T., & Dreier, M. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042399 · Cited by 15
Fifer, S. J., Puig, A., Sequeira, V., Acar, M., Ng, C. H., Blanchard, M., Cabrera, A., Freemantle, J., & Grunfeld, J. A. (2021) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s311699 · Cited by 14
Sugitani, Y., Ito, K., & Ono, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2021.697711 · Cited by 14
The use of medication adherence guidelines in medication taking behaviour research
Bekker, C. L., Aslani, P., & Chen, T. F. (2021) · Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.08.006 · Cited by 14
Guerrini, C. J., Crossnohere, N. L., Rasmussen, L. M., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-96743-4 · Cited by 14
Self-citationManipis, K., Mulhern, B. J., Haywood, P., Viney, R. C., & Goodall, S. (2022) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-022-01512-3 · Cited by 14
Ferroglio, E., Avagnina, A., Barroso, P., Benatti, F., Cardoso, B., Gómez, A., Gonçalves, C., Neimanis, A. S., Poncina, M., Rodríguez, C. R., et al. (2022) · EFSA Supporting Publications · doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2022.en-7578 · Cited by 14
Kerkhoff, A. D., Muiruri, C., Geng, E. H., & Hickey, M. D. (2022) · Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS · doi:10.1097/coh.0000000000000776 · Cited by 13
Wang, S. Y., Cantarelli, P., Groene, O., Stargardt, T., & Bellè, N. (2022) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.11.009 · Cited by 15
Preventive audiology: An African perspective
Sebothoma, B., Govender, S., Joubert, K., Kanji, A., Moroe, N., Masuku, K. P., Maluleke, N. P., & Ntlhakana, L. (2022) · doi:10.4102/aosis.2022.bk209 · Cited by 15
Al-Aqeel, S., Alotaiwi, R., & Albugami, B. (2023) · Health Economics Review · doi:10.1186/s13561-023-00431-0 · Cited by 14
Menges, D., Piatti, M. C., Omlin, A. G., Cathomas, R. L., Benamran, D. A., Fischer, S., Iselin, C. E., Küng, M., Lorch, A., Prause, L. W., et al. (2023) · European Urology Open Science · doi:10.1016/j.euros.2023.03.001 · Cited by 14
Shim, J. K., Foti, N., Vasquez, E. E., Fullerton, S. M., Bentz, M., Jeske, M., & Lee, S. S. (2023) · AJOB Empirical Bioethics · doi:10.1080/23294515.2023.2201478 · Cited by 14
Chen, S., Yang, J., Ma, B., Meng, J., Chen, Y., Ma, T., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Huang, Y., Zhao, Y., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104699 · Cited by 14
Willingness to pay for internet speed and quality
Rabbani, M., BOGULSKI, C. A., Eswaran, H., & Hayes, C. J. (2024) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2024.102173 · Cited by 14
Prosser, L. A., Payne, K., Rusinak, D., Shi, P., & Messonnier, M. L. (2013) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-013-0029-6 · Cited by 14
Self-citationStudy protocol: DEcisions in health Care to Introduce or Diffuse innovations using Evidence (DECIDE)
Turner, S., Stephen Morris, A., Sheringham, J., Hudson, E., & Fulop, N. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0412-8 · Cited by 13
Pinto, D., Danilovich, M., Hansen, P., Finn, D. J., Chang, R. W., Holl, J. L., Heinemann, A. W., & Böckenholt, U. (2016) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.11.024 · Cited by 13
Raymond, M., Demers, L., & Feldman, D. E. (2017) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.031 · Cited by 14
Patient and physician preferences for attributes of coronary revascularization
Magliano, C. A. D. S., Monteiro, A. L., Tura, B. R., Oliveira, C. S. R., Rebelo, A. R. D. O., & Pereira, C. C. D. A. (2018) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s164550 · Cited by 14
Akiyama, S., Goren, A., Basurto, E., Komori, T., & Harada, T. (2018) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s166332 · Cited by 14
Novel Approaches to Value Assessment Beyond the Cost-Effectiveness Framework
Reed, S. D., Dubois, R. W., Johnson, F. R., Jaime, J., & Phelps, C. E. (2019) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2019.04.1914 · Cited by 14
Self-citationCharvin, M., Launoy, G. D., & Berchi, C. (2020) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05327-x · Cited by 14
Arslan, I. G., Huls, S. P. I., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Rozendaal, R. M., Persoons, M. C. T., Hell, M. E. S.-V., Bindels, P., Bierma‐Zeinstra, S., & Schiphof, D. (2020) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2020.07.002 · Cited by 15
Crossnohere, N. L., Janse, S., Janssen, E. M., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2020) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-020-00450-7 · Cited by 14
Self-citationReinisch, M., Marschner, N. W., Otto, T., Korfel, A., Stoffregen, C., & Wöckel, A. (2021) · Breast Care · doi:10.1159/000513139 · Cited by 14
Choi, M., Raeside, R., Hyun, K. K., Partridge, S. R., Thiagalingam, A., & Redfern, J. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/26224 · Cited by 14
Panchalingam, T., & Shi, Y. (2022) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107288 · Cited by 15
Understanding Consumer Preferences in the Context of Managed Competition
Trujillo, A. J., Ruiz, F., Bridges, J. F. P., Lara, J. L. A., Buttorff, C., & Quiroga, A. M. (2011) · Applied Health Economics and Health Policy · doi:10.2165/11594820-000000000-00000 · Cited by 14
Self-citationEconomic evaluations of homeopathy: a review
Viksveen, P., Dymitr, Z., & Simoens, S. (2013) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-013-0462-7 · Cited by 14
Meinhardt, U. J., Eiholzer, U., Seitz, L., Bøgelund, M., & Kappelgaard, A. (2013) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1586/17434440.2014.856754 · Cited by 14
Preference for Human Papillomavirus–Based Cervical Cancer Screening
Chamot, E., Mulambia, C., Kapambwe, S. K., Shrestha, S., Parham, G. P., Macwan’gi, M., & Mwanahamuntu, M. (2014) · Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease · doi:10.1097/lgt.0000000000000081 · Cited by 14
van den Brink, M. J., Beelen, P., Herman, M. C., Claassen, N. J. J., Bongers, M. Y., Geomini, P. M. A. J., van der Steeg, J. W., van den Wijngaard, L., & van Wely, M. (2018) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.06.020 · Cited by 14
Clinical Decision-Making for Thrombolysis of Acute Minor Stroke Using Adaptive Conjoint Analysis
Liberman, A. L., Pinto, D., Rostanski, S., Labovitz, D., Naidech, A. M., & Prabhakaran, S. (2018) · The Neurohospitalist · doi:10.1177/1941874418799563 · Cited by 14
Lokkerbol, J., van Voorthuijsen, J. M., Geomini, A., Tiemens, B. G., van Straten, A., Smit, F., Risseeuw, A., van Balkom, A. J. L. M., & Hiligsmann, M. (2018) · Journal of Medical Economics · doi:10.1080/13696998.2018.1555403 · Cited by 14
Mohammadi, T., Zhang, W., Sou, J., Langlois, S. F., Munro, S. B., & Anis, A. H. (2019) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-019-00402-w · Cited by 14
Models of generalist and specialist care in smaller hospitals in England: a mixed-methods study
Vaughan, L., Bardsley, M., Bell, D., Davies, M. S., Goddard, A. F., Imison, C., Melnychuk, M., Stephen Morris, A., & Rafferty, A. M. (2021) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr09040 · Cited by 13
Stated Preferences in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Meirelles, I. O., & Magliano, C. A. D. S. (2021) · Patient Preference and Adherence · doi:10.2147/ppa.s302394 · Cited by 13
Precision medicine and the principle of equal treatment: a conjoint analysis
Tranvåg, E. J., Strand, R., Ottersen, T., & Norheim, O. F. (2021) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-021-00625-3 · Cited by 13
Pinto, C. A., Chua, G. N., Bridges, J. F. P., Brookes, E., Hyacinthe, J., & Tervonen, T. (2021) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-021-00548-6 · Cited by 13
Self-citationWomen’s preferences for antenatal care in Tanzania: a discrete choice experiment
Camacho, E. M., Smyth, R. M., Danna, V. A., Kimaro, D., Kuzenza, F., Laisser, R. M., Mdoe, P. F., Nsemwa, L., Shayo, H., & Lavender, T. (2022) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-022-04634-x · Cited by 13
Batchelder, L., Philpott, S., Divino, V. M., Boytsov, N. N., Maiese, E. M., Hogea, C. S., Buckingham, T. L., Chen, C., & Rodríguez, A. M. (2022) · Future Oncology · doi:10.2217/fon-2022-0378 · Cited by 13
Seo, J., Tervonen, T., Ueda, K., Zhang, D., Danno, D., & Tockhorn‐Heidenreich, A. (2023) · Neurology and Therapy · doi:10.1007/s40120-023-00453-0 · Cited by 13
Fischer, A.-K., & Mühlbacher, A. C. (2023) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/46056 · Cited by 14
Marshall, D. A., Suryaprakash, N., Bryan, S., Barker, K. L., MacKean, G., Zelinsky, S., McCarron, T. L., Santana, M., Moayyedi, P., & Lavallee, D. C. (2023) · Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwad045 · Cited by 14
Self-citationLiu, S., Xiang, Y., Gu, Y., Chen, N., Fu, P., Wei, Y., Zhao, P., Li, Y., Du, C., Mu, W., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104695 · Cited by 14
Brandstetter, L., Jírů-Hillmann, S., Störk, S., Heuschmann, P. U., Wöckel, A., & Reese, J. (2024) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-024-00679-6 · Cited by 13
Arije, O., Madan, J. J., & Hlungwani, T. M. (2024) · Health Economics Review · doi:10.1186/s13561-024-00497-4 · Cited by 13
Beusterien, K. M., Law, A. W., Maculaitis, M. C., Will, O., Kopenhafer, L., Olsen, P., Hauber, B., Vietri, J., Cappelleri, J. C., Coulter, J., et al. (2024) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines12050560 · Cited by 13
Ng, V., & Sargeant, J. M. (2015) · Zoonoses and Public Health · doi:10.1111/zph.12220 · Cited by 13
How Important Is Mode of Administration in Treatments for Rheumatic Diseases and Related Conditions?
Bansback, N. J., Trenaman, L., & Harrison, M. J. (2015) · Current Rheumatology Reports · doi:10.1007/s11926-015-0514-3 · Cited by 13
Markowitz, M. A., Levitan, B. S., Mohamed, A. F., Johnson, F. R., Bridges, J. F. P., Alphs, L. D., & Citrome, L. (2014) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201300290 · Cited by 14
Self-citationBoqué, C., Sazatornil, M. R. A., Agustín, M. J., García‐Goñi, M., Moreno, C. D., Gabás‐Rivera, C., Granados, E., Castro-Gómez, A., Pardo, C., & Lizán, L. (2019) · Journal of Geriatric Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.jgo.2019.03.010 · Cited by 13
Self-Monitoring App Preferences for Sun Protection: Discrete Choice Experiment Survey Analysis
Nittas, V., Mütsch, M., Braun, J., & Puhan, M. A. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/18889 · Cited by 14
Visser, L. A., Huls, S. P. I., Groot, C. A. U., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., & Redekop, K. (2021) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jns.2021.117587 · Cited by 13
Predmore, Z., Doby, B. L., Durand, C. M., Segev, D. L., Sugarman, J., Tobian, A. A. R., & Wu, A. W. (2021) · Transplant Infectious Disease · doi:10.1111/tid.13721 · Cited by 13
Forma, F. M., Chiu, K., Shafrin, J. T., Boskovic, D. H., & Veeranki, S. P. (2022) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076221084472 · Cited by 12
Halton, C., Duane, B. G., Batey, A. C., Wong, J., Corley, A., Hart, F., Koh, J., & Johnston, B. M. (2022) · BDJ · doi:10.1038/s41415-022-4914-2 · Cited by 13
Gc, V. S., Iglesias, C. P., Erdem, S., Hassan, L., Peek, N. B., & Manca, A. (2022) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462322003233 · Cited by 13
Maluleke, N. P. (2022) · doi:10.4102/aosis.2022.bk209.10 · Cited by 14
Kularatna, S., Allen, M. J., Hettiarachchi, R. M., Crawford-Williams, F. M., Senanayake, S. J., Brain, D., Hart, N. H., Koczwara, B., Ee, C., & Chan, R. J. (2023) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-023-00631-0 · Cited by 12
Kateeb, E. T., Warren, J. J., Gaeth, G. J., Damiano, P. C., Momany, E. T., Kanellis, M. J., Weber‐Gasparoni, K., & Ansley, T. N. (2014) · Journal of Public Health Dentistry · doi:10.1111/jphd.12052 · Cited by 13
Shanahan, M., Gerard, K., & Ritter, A. J. (2014) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.03.005 · Cited by 14
Patient, Caregiver, and Nurse Preferences for Treatments for Bone Metastases from Solid Tumors
Qian, Y., Arellano, J., Hauber, B., Mohamed, A. F., González, J. M., Hechmati, G., Gatta, F., Harrelson, S. S., & Campbell‐Baird, C. (2016) · Patient · doi:10.1007/s40271-015-0158-4 · Cited by 13
Translational Health Economics
Rogowski, W. H., John, J., & IJzerman, M. J. (2016) · WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks · doi:10.1142/9789813140530_0010 · Cited by 13
Thomson, R. G., Brún, A. D., Flynn, D., Ternent, L., Price, C., Rodgers, H., Ford, G. A., Rudd, M. P., Lancsar, E., Simpson, S., et al. (2017) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr05040 · Cited by 13
Discerning the clinical relevance of biomarkers in early stage breast cancer
Ballinger, T. J., Kassem, N., Shen, F., Jiang, G., Smith, M. L., Railey, E., Howell, J. R., White, C. B., & Schneider, B. P. (2017) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-017-4238-0 · Cited by 13
Individual preferences on the balancing of good and harm of cardiovascular disease screening
Hansen, T. B., Lindholt, J. S., Diederichsen, A. C. P., Bliemer, M. C. J., Lambrechtsen, J., Steffensen, F. H., & Søgaard, R. (2019) · Heart · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314103 · Cited by 13
Veterans’ preferences for tobacco treatment in primary care: A discrete choice experiment
Katz, D. A., Hamlin, C., Weg, M. W. V., Grant, K. M., Steffensmeier, K. S., Paez, M., Hawley, S. T., & Gaeth, G. J. (2019) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2019.10.002 · Cited by 14
Noble, A. J., Mathieson, A., Ridsdale, L., Holmes, E. A. F., Morgan, M., McKinlay, A. R., Dickson, J. M., Jackson, M., Hughes, D. A., Goodacre, S. W., et al. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031696 · Cited by 12
Preferences for vaccination program attributes among parents of young infants in Shanghai, China
Huang, Z., Wagner, A. L., Lin, M., Sun, X., Zikmund‐Fisher, B. J., Boulton, M. L., Ren, J., & Prosser, L. A. (2020) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2020.1712937 · Cited by 13
Self-citationKrzyżowski, Ł., & Nowicka, M. (2020) · Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1177/1440783320902945 · Cited by 16
Khan, N., Feliciano, J., Müller, K., He, M., Tao, R., Korol, E. E., Dalal, M. R., Rebeira, M., & Matasar, M. J. (2020) · Leukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma · doi:10.1080/10428194.2020.1783443 · Cited by 13
What do young people in high-income countries want from STI testing services? A systematic review
Gan, J., Kularadhan, V., Chow, E. P. F., Fairley, C. K., Hocking, J. S., Kong, F. Y. S., & Ong, J. J. (2021) · Sexually Transmitted Infections · doi:10.1136/sextrans-2021-055044 · Cited by 12
Ranjbar, M., Rashidian, A., Shariati, M., Foroushani, A. R., & Sari, A. A. (2016) · Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal · doi:10.5812/ircmj.29194 · Cited by 13
Using MCDA (Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis) to prioritise publicly-funded health care
Sullivan, T. A. (2012) · Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago) · Cited by 13
Bertrand, T., Bartlett-Esquilant, G., Fischer, K., & Friedrich, M. (2022) · Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s41687-022-00419-0 · Cited by 12
Wang, Q., Chen, Y., Peng, Y., Yuan, H., Chen, Z., Wang, J., Xue, H., & Zhang, X. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0275209 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Bridges, J. F. P., Hauber, A. B., Marshall, D., Lloyd, A., Prosser, L. A., Regier, D. A., Johnson, F. R., & Mauskopf, J.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- University of Calgary (CA)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
- RTI Health Solutions (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bridges, John F.P.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Value in Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 403-413
- ISSN
- 1098-3015 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121619367
- Cited by
- 2,029
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 184 · 2025: 199 · 2024: 217 · 2023: 178 · 2022: 213 · 2021: 195 · 2020: 158 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 124 · 2016: 84 · 2015: 91 · 2014: 77 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 37
- FWCI
- 134.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Value in Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
- Keywords
- conjoint analysis, discrete choice experiment, stated preference methods, good scientific practice, methodological standards, checklists, preference elicitation, experimental design, ISPOR
- MeSH terms
- Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Research Design, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Economics, Pharmaceutical, Advisory Committees, Internationality, Checklist, Research Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
