The DOI matches its Crossref record; 183 of the 184 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Alongside Clinical Trials II—An ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force Report
Open accessAbstract
Clinical trials evaluating medicines, medical devices, and procedures now commonly assess the economic value of these interventions. The growing number of prospective clinical/economic trials reflects both widespread interest in economic information for new technologies and the regulatory and reimbursement requirements of many countries that now consider evidence of economic value along with clinical efficacy. As decision makers increasingly demand evidence of economic value for health care interventions, conducting high-quality economic analyses alongside clinical studies is desirable because they broaden the scope of information available on a particular intervention, and can efficiently provide timely information with high internal and, when designed and analyzed properly, reasonable external validity. In 2005, ISPOR published the Good Research Practices for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Alongside Clinical Trials: The ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force report. ISPOR initiated an update of the report in 2014 to include the methodological developments over the last 9 years. This report provides updated recommendations reflecting advances in several areas related to trial design, selecting data elements, database design and management, analysis, and reporting of results. Task force members note that trials should be designed to evaluate effectiveness (rather than efficacy) when possible, should include clinical outcome measures, and should obtain health resource use and health state utilities directly from study subjects. Collection of economic data should be fully integrated into the study. An incremental analysis should be conducted with an intention-to-treat approach, complemented by relevant subgroup analyses. Uncertainty should be characterized. Articles should adhere to established standards for reporting results of cost-effectiveness analyses. Economic studies alongside trials are complementary to other evaluations (e.g., modeling studies) as information for decision makers who consider evidence of economic value along with clinical efficacy when making resource allocation decisions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The economic evaluation will be performed from a societal perspective, and all analyses will be conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle, in which we adhere to the related guidelines [67–69].”
In the citing paper
“For example, parameter uncertainty will be covered by, for example, sensitivity analyses in which imputed uncertainty is also taken into account by repeating the economic evaluation on the imputed dataset and sampling uncertainty will be taken into account by providing a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve and frontier [67].”
In the citing paper
“Best practice within-trial economic evaluation methods will be adopted53”
Citations
Cites
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994) · doi:10.1201/9780429246593 · Cited by 40,500
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
Rubin, D. B. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316696 · Cited by 20,701
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Lahiff, M., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289883 · Cited by 17,385
Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
Drummond, M. E., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198529446.001.0001 · Cited by 13,648
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
the CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-18 · Cited by 13,371
Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
Herdman, M., Gudex, C., Lloyd, A., Janssen, M., Kind, P., Parkin, D., Bonsel, G., & Badia, X. (2011) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x · Cited by 9,795
Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine
(1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195108248.001.0001 · Cited by 7,193
Awais, A. (2015) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · doi:10.17632/zcvgc6m58h.1 · Cited by 6,790
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Ghosh, S., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1988) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269814 · Cited by 4,730
(1997) · doi:10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002 · Cited by 4,544
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Sullivan, 2001, Design and analytic considerations in determining the cost-effectiveness of early intervention in asthma from a multinational clinical trial, Control Clin Trials, 22, 420, 10.1016/S0197-2456(01)00137-4 · DOI
- Barber, 2000, Analysis of cost data in randomized trials: an application of the nonparametric bootstrap, Stat Med, 19, 3219, 10.1002/1097-0258(20001215)19:23<3219::AID-SIM623>3.0.CO;2-P · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 810
McClinton, S. M., Heiderscheit, B. C., Flynn, T. W., & Pinto, D. (2025) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/pzaf119 · Cited by 3
“…variables that had potential to affect the results on the basis of PHP research and input from experts in economic evaluation, public health, PHP management, and individuals with PHP. 57,58 Although we attempted to capture all relevant costs, there may be variables not represented in this study.”
InfluentialLiang, S., McKay, S., Lin, F., Zaheed, M., Morrow, A., Douglas, B., Chan, J., Monaghan, H., Chan, P., Kennedy, E., et al. (2025) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090270 · Cited by 4
Fiore, J. F., Shirzadi, S., Roversi, K., Prakash, I., Wong, S. M., Meterissian, S. H., Meguerditchian, A. N., Desbiens, C., Rivard, J., Delisle, M., et al. (2025) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-107258 · Cited by 4
“The trial is coordinated by the RI-MUHC Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), with oversight from the principal investigators and operational leadership by a CORE-based research coordinator.”
Kronborg, C., Kongstad, L. P., Diederichsen, S. Z., Højberg, S., Haugan, K., Graff, C., Brandes, A., Lydiksen, N. V., Køber, L., Krieger, D. W., et al. (2026) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-026-01898-4 · Cited by 3
Wynne, O., Szewczyk, Z., Hollis, J., Farragher, E., Doherty, E. L., Tully, B., Paolucci, F., Gillham, K. E., Reeves, P., Wiggers, J. H., et al. (2023) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-023-00420-8 · Cited by 3
Testing an insurance-based monetary incentive program for exercise: RCT design and rationale
Williams, D. M., Bohlen, L. C., DUNSIGER, S. I., Ayala-Heredia, V., Griffin, E., Dionne, L. A., Wilson-Barthes, M. G., Unick, J. L., LaRowe, L. R., & Galárraga, O. (2023) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2023.107382 · Cited by 4
Barakat, A., Cornelis, J. E., Dekker, J., Lommerse, N. M., Beekman, A. T. F., & Blankers, M. (2024) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-024-01675-1 · Cited by 4
Avanceña, A. L. V., Brody, C., Chhoun, P., Tuot, S., & Yi, S. (2024) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/52734 · Cited by 3
“Our probabilistic economic evaluation is designed to determine the probability that Mobile Link is cost-effective compared with usual care, given the uncertainty in the available evidence [22-24].”
BackgroundBorsoi, L., Listorti, E., & Ciani, O. (2024) · PharmacoEconomics - Open · doi:10.1007/s41669-024-00519-1 · Cited by 3
“…costs and consequences of the CINDERELLA APProach versus the standard of care over the trial period through trial-based cost-consequence and cost-utility analyses, conducted in accordance with the Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Good Research Practices [28].”
BackgroundMethodSligl, W., Yan, C., Round, J. A., Wang, X., Chen, J. Z., Boehm, C., Fong, K., Crick, K., Clua, M. G., Codan, C., et al. (2024) · PharmacoEconomics - Open · doi:10.1007/s41669-024-00538-y · Cited by 3
“The cost and effectiveness data were repeatedly modeled in the simulation for 10,000 iterations, using predetermined probability distributions [23–25].”
Wang, Y., Tyagi, S., Ng, D. W. L., Teo, V. H. Y., Kok, D., Foo, D. H. P., & Koh, G. C. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/59275 · Cited by 3
“The Good Research Practice Task Force Report from the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research was referred to guide the analysis [16].”
Jelinek, T., O’Brien, C., Young, A., Hughes, G. K., Bratten, C., Paul, E., & Vassar, M. B. (2025) · JSES Reviews Reports and Techniques · doi:10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.04.015 · Cited by 3
Gilchrist, G., Swan, D., Shaw, A., Keding, A., Towers, S., Craine, N., Munro, A., Hughes, E. A., Parrott, S., Mdege, N. D., et al. (2017) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta21720 · Cited by 3
Mazzei, D. R., Ademola, A., Abbott, J. H., Sajobi, T., Hildebrand, K. A., & Marshall, D. A. (2020) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-020-01492-6 · Cited by 3
A Bayesian Framework for Patient-Level Partitioned Survival Cost-Utility Analysis
Gabrio, A. (2020) · Medical decision making · doi:10.1177/0272989x211012348 · Cited by 2
“We start by modelling ePFS it with a Gumbel distribution using an identify link function for the mean: ePFS it ∼ Gumbel(φPFS et , σPFS et ), φPFS et = α PFS 0t , (11)”
MethodBellows, B. K., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z., Lloyd‐Jones, D. M., Bress, A. P., King, J. B., Kolm, P., Cushman, W. C., Johnson, K., Tamariz, L. J., et al. (2021) · Journal of the American Heart Association · doi:10.1161/jaha.120.020361 · Cited by 3
“7,8 13 These methods are limited by requiring hypothetical assumptions about continuation of treatment effects and event rates that may not necessarily represent the trial-eligible populations.”
Yan, V. K. C., Haendler, M., Lau, H., Li, X., Lao, K. S. J., Tsui, S.-H., Yap, C. Y. L., Knapp, M. R. J., & Chan, E. W. (2022) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1374 · Cited by 3
Galactionova, K., Loibl, S., Salari, P., Marmé, F., Martín, M., Untch, M., Bonnefoi, H. R., Kim, S., Bear, H. D., McCarthy, N., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.886831 · Cited by 3
The role of epidemiology research in economic evaluation for Health Technology Assessment
Stamuli, E., & Panagiotakos, D. B. (2022) · Journal of Atherosclerosis Prevention and Treatment · doi:10.53590/japt.02.1038 · Cited by 3
Lueza, B., Auperin, A., Rigaud, C., Gross, T. G., Pillon, M., Delgado, R. F., Uyttebroeck, A., Burke, G. A. A., Zsíros, J., Csóka, M., et al. (2023) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-023-01581-y · Cited by 3
Costs of endovascular and open repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms
Gray, J., McCarthy, A., Samarakoon, D., McMeekin, P. J., Sharples, L. D., Sastry, P., Crawshaw, P., Bicknell, C. D., the ETTAA Collaborative Group, Large, S., et al. (2023) · British journal of surgery · doi:10.1093/bjs/znad378 · Cited by 3
“In addition, none of the studies to date adopted a detailed micro-costing exercise and presented details of costing methodologies that should be adopted when undertaking costing studies 31 , particularly in relation to annuitization of costs and discounting.”
BackgroundBlair, P. S., Young, G., Clement, C., Dixon, P., Seume, P., Ingram, J. C., Taylor, J., Horwood, J. P., Lucas, P. J., Cabral, C., et al. (2023) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/ucth3411 · Cited by 3
Decker, S. R. D. R., Marzzani, L. E., de Ferreira, P. R., Rosa, P. R. M., Brauner, J. S., Rosa, R. G., & Bertoldi, E. G. (2024) · American Heart Journal Plus Cardiology Research and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100373 · Cited by 3
“Nonetheless, further clinical trials incorporating nested cost evaluations are imperative to enhance our comprehension of these capabilities and to mitigate the inherent uncertainties in our research design [31], where we make several assumptions, thus warranting cautious extrapolation of results.”
BackgroundPan, Z., Chapman, D. A., Sullivan, T. N., Bishop, D. L., & Kimmel, A. D. (2024) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-024-01729-z · Cited by 3
“For reported crime cases, we varied the reported number of crime cases and violent crime cases by + / − 25% to capture variation in youth violence in different communities (Ramsey et al., 2015) and variation in crime reporting (Thompson & Tapp, 2022).”
BackgroundSkinner, J. A., Leary, M., Wynne, O., Hay, P., Collins, C. E., & Burrows, T. L. (2024) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdae273 · Cited by 3
“24,25 Component costs are reported to provide insight into the cost of active and passive forms of the intervention and specific drivers of total cost.”
Self-Help Interventions for the Treatment of Binge Eating
Hilbert, A., & Puls, H. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-43562-2_19 · Cited by 3
Antenatal corticosteroid administration in late-preterm gestations: a cost-effectiveness analysis
Rosenbloom, J. I., Lewkowitz, A. K., Sondgeroth, K. E., Hudson, J., Macones, G. A., Cahill, A. G., Tuuli, M. G., & Chang, S. (2018) · The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.1080/14767058.2018.1540582 · Cited by 3
“Third, instead of utilizing a composite primary outcome of varying clinical significance, our model utilized specific clinical diagnoses, which increases the clinical significance of our model [24].”
MethodWissenschaftskommunikation im Gesundheitsbereich
Serong, J., Lang, B., & Wormer, H. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-10727-7_7 · Cited by 4
Sorato, M. M., Davari, M., Kebriaeezadeh, A., Naderi, N., Sarrafzadegan, N., Shibru, T., Nikfar, S., & Arero, A. G. (2020) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/jphs.12384 · Cited by 3
Zhao, T., Winzenberg, T. M., de Graaff, B., Aitken, D. A., Ahmad, H., & Palmer, A. J. (2020) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.24478 · Cited by 3
“Quite a few potentially eligible CUA/CEA reports could not be included as they did not adequately report the required HSUVs (preand/or posttreatment) (45,46), despite clear reporting guidelines that recommend these be reported (47,48).”
García‐Pérez, L., Ramallo‐Fariña, Y., Vallejo‐Torres, L., Rodríguez‐Rodríguez, L., González‐Pacheco, H., Santos-Hernández, B., Bello, M. Á. G., Wägner, A. M., Carmona, M., & Serrano‐Aguilar, P. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058049 · Cited by 3
Png, M. E., Dritsaki, M., Gray, A. M., Pinedo‐Villanueva, R., Rivero‐Arias, O., & Nanchahal, J. (2018) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14936.1 · Cited by 3
Merging Regulatory and Reimbursement Needs in Clinical Trials
Cook, J. R. (2015) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2015.02.007 · Cited by 3
Goudman, L., Putman, K. D., Doorslaer, L. V., Billot, M., Manuel Roulaud, B., Rigoard, P., Billet, B., Bryon, B., Plazier, M., Raymaekers, V., et al. (2023) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-023-07140-3 · Cited by 3
“The point estimates of incremental costs and increment health benefits (deterministic analyses) are subject to uncertainty which will be addressed in probabilistic analyses [52].”
BackgroundEconomic Evaluation Methods and Approaches
Janković, D., & Faria, R. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-64477-2_65 · Cited by 3
Förster, A., Godfrey, M., Green, J. R., McMaster, N., Airlie, J., Cundill, B., Lawton, R., Hawkins, R., Hulme, C. T., Birch, K. M., et al. (2021) · Programme Grants for Applied Research · doi:10.3310/pgfar09090 · Cited by 3
Hoving, M. P., Jongen, P. J., Evers, S., Edens, M. A., & Zeinstra, E. (2022) · BMC Neurology · doi:10.1186/s12883-022-02948-z · Cited by 2
“Despite the usual skewness in the distribution of costs, the arithmetic means will be generally considered the most appropriate measures to describe cost data [58, 59].”
BackgroundCost-effectiveness analysis design for interventions to prevent children's oral disease
Spetz, J., Rose, J., Kahn, J. G., Lin, T. K., Levy, D. E., Pugach, O., Hyde, S., Borrelli, B., Henshaw, M., Martin, M. A., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Oral Health · doi:10.3389/froh.2024.1428638 · Cited by 2
“All four trials are conducting a CEA, with the BEECON and PACT studies also developing QALY measures for a CUA, which is challenging due to the potential burden of obtaining valid data that can be used to determine QALYs.”
MethodInfluentialTiesteel, E., Watkins, R. C., Stringer, C., Grigorie, A., Sultana, F., & Hughes, J. C. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14090957 · Cited by 5
Wang, M., Moodley, P., Khanyile, M., Bulo, E., Zondi, M., Naidoo, K., Sookrajh, Y., Dorward, J., Gandhi, M., Garrett, N., et al. (2025) · Journal of the International AIDS Society · doi:10.1002/jia2.70004 · Cited by 2
Fraslin, A., Auperin, A., Even, C., Fayette, J., Saâda-Bouzid, E., Lafond, C., Geoffrois, L., Martin, L., Capitain, O., Vinches, M., et al. (2025) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2025.07.032 · Cited by 2
Siverskog, J., Andersson, J., Hensler, I., Grönqvist, E., & Arnberg, F. K. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/69426 · Cited by 3
“…instruments to HRQoL weights is becoming more common, but generic instruments (eg, the EQ-5D) are still considered best practice in economic evaluation [66], which limits the possibility of comparing the magnitude of a QALY gain in this study to that of QALY gains in other studies.”
Xie, F., Yao, Y., Ma, Y., Humphries, B., Lau, V. I., Fowler, R. A., Rochwerg, B. N., Heels‐Ansdell, D., Zytaruk, N. L., Barletta, J. F., et al. (2025) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.52771 · Cited by 2
Palacios, A., Walker, S., Woods, B., Hewitt, C. E., Cracknell, A. L., Murray, J., Lawton, R., & Richardson, G. A. (2025) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afaf346 · Cited by 2
“The analysis adhered to established guidelines for reporting within-trial economic evaluation studies (Gomes et al., 2012a; Husereau et al., 2022; Ramsey et al., 2015) to ensure comprehensive and transparent reporting.”
Cutting Costs, Saving Lives: A Surgeon's Guide to the Foundations of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Zhang, Y., Ratcliff, G. E., & Zhu, J. (2026) · Journal of Surgical Research · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2025.12.044 · Cited by 2
Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., Wu, K., & Huang, Z. (2026) · Frontiers in Sports and Active Living · doi:10.3389/fspor.2025.1728168 · Cited by 2
From Paper to Platform: Updating the Dutch Costing Manual and Launching a Web Application
Roijen, L. H., Peeters, S. B., Reckers‐Droog, V., Evers, S., Wijnen, B. F. M., Veld, L. M. H. I. '., Thielen, F. W. F., & Kanters, T. A. (2026) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-026-01590-8 · Cited by 2
Udeze, C., Gargano, M. A., Yang, H., Ogunsile, F. J., Li, N., Fang, H., Jeyakumar, S., & Lopez, A. (2026) · Journal of Medical Economics · doi:10.1080/13696998.2026.2649528 · Cited by 3
Lin, H., Zhong, Y., Zheng, S., Jiang, X., Xu, Y., Chan, S., Liu, S., Chow, K. M., Yang, Q., Huang, W., et al. (2026) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/85913 · Cited by 2
Kim, M., Asche, C. V., & Kim, I. K. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23329-1_6 · Cited by 2
Weber, S. A., Pietzsch, M., Bestard, O., Grinyo, J. M., Viklický, O., & Reinke, P. (2016) · Advances in Precision Medicine · doi:10.18063/apm.2016.01.004 · Cited by 2
Shiroiwa, T., Fukuda, T., Shimozuma, K., Mouri, M., Hagiwara, Y., Kawahara, T., Ohsumi, S., Hozumi, Y., Sagara, Y., Ohashi, Y., et al. (2017) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3774-7 · Cited by 2
“Such a trial-based [12, 13] cost-effectiveness analysis could improve the robustness of analysis and validity of internal comparison compared to a model-based approach [14] (e.”
Filippatos, G. S., Lu, X., Tsintzos, S. I., Gold, M. R., Müllens, W., Birnie, D. H., Hersi, A. S., KUSANO, K. F., Leclercq, C., Fagan, D. H., et al. (2020) · Journal of Medical Economics · doi:10.1080/13696998.2020.1835333 · Cited by 2
“assessment (HTA) agency is prerequisite to reimbursement.[35,36] In addition, economic value to hospital providers is crucial to the adoption of new technologies.”
BackgroundKhairnar, R. R., DeMora, L., Sandler, H. M., Lee, W. R., Villalonga-Olives, E., Mullins, C. D., Palumbo, F. B., Bruner, D. W., Shaya, F. T., Bentzen, S. M., et al. (2022) · JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics · doi:10.1200/cci.21.00188 · Cited by 2
Callander, E. J., Andrews, C. J., Sketcher‐Baker, K. M., Nicholl, M., Farrell, T., Karger, S., & Flenady, V. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058988 · Cited by 2
Santos-Moreno, P., Parra-Padilla, D., la Rosa, F. G.-D., Carrasquilla-Sotomayor, M., Villarreal, L., Jervis-Jálabe, D. S., & Alvis-Zakzuk, N. (2022) · Value in Health Regional Issues · doi:10.1016/j.vhri.2022.08.003 · Cited by 3
Menzies, N. A., Berthé, F., Hitchings, M. D. T., Aruna, P., Hamza, M. A., Nanama, S., Steve-Edemba, C., Shehu, I., Grais, R. F., & Isanaka, S. (2022) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0001189 · Cited by 2
How Much Better is Faster? Value Adjustments for Health-Improvement Sequences
Johnson, F. R., González, J. M., Sheehan, J. J., & Reed, S. D. (2023) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-023-01266-7 · Cited by 2
“Some authors have suggested that HSUs should be estimated to detect treatment effects over shorter time intervals [35].”
BackgroundSelf-citationValuing quality of life for economic evaluations in cancer: navigating multiple methods
Ng, C., Lourenço, R. D. A., Viney, R. C., Norman, R., King, M. T., Kim, N. V., & Mulhern, B. J. (2024) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1080/14737167.2024.2393332 · Cited by 2
“The growing prevalence and cost of chronic progressive diseases, including cancer, has also led to more economic evaluations based on a combination of clinical trials and real-world data [80].”
Zanganeh, M., Belcher, J., Fotheringham, J., Coyle, D., Lindley, E. J., Keane, D. F., Caskey, F. J., Dasgupta, I., Davenport, A., Farrington, K., et al. (2024) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/jypr4287 · Cited by 2
“23,45,51 Despite these strengths, this study has certain limitations.”
BackgroundModernizing Newborn Screening in the Genomic Era: Importance of Health-Related Quality of Life
Kim, E., Wu, A. C., Christensen, K. D., Wright, D. R., Yeh, J. M., & Smith, H. S. (2024) · PharmacoEconomics - Open · doi:10.1007/s41669-024-00528-0 · Cited by 2
“Another approach is to integrate health economic and outcomes working groups into prospective trials and pilot newborn screening programs [55].”
BackgroundChalabianloo, F., Fadnes, L. T., Aßmus, J., Mordal, J., Solli, K. K., Dale, K. S., Andersen, C. D., Zavenova, S., Rønning, B. H., Blomkvist, A. W., et al. (2025) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-024-08692-8 · Cited by 2
“The analysis will follow the current guidelines and will be conducted by a health economist [30].”
Cost-effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants in non-valvular atrial fibrillation
Gorostiza, I., Bilbao‐González, A., & Mar, J. (2025) · Gaceta Sanitaria · doi:10.1016/j.gaceta.2025.102451 · Cited by 2
Liu, S., Lv, Y.-S., Liu, M., Han, S., Liu, X., Zhao, Z., Cui, W., Yang, A., & Li, Y. (2022) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.922950 · Cited by 2
“Even when the primary outcome was similar (as was the case in this study), costeffectiveness analysis should be performed to assess the effectiveness rather than the efficacy of the procedure (25).”
ResultCost‐effectiveness of web‐based therapy: what's it worth?
Kerr, C. (2017) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1111/dmcn.13441 · Cited by 2
“Healthcare systems require evidence of clinical effectiveness and economic value to satisfy regulatory and reimbursement requirements.(1) Estimates of value for money of a particular medicine, procedure, or therapeutic intervention are of relevance to all healthcare clients: governments, insurers, service providers, d…”
BackgroundOn behalf of the CARRS Trial Group, Singh, K., Ali, M. K., Devarajan, R., Shivashankar, R., Kondal, D., Ajay, V. S., Menon, V. U., Varthakavi, P. K., Viswanathan, V., et al. (2019) · Global Health Research and Policy · doi:10.1186/s41256-019-0099-x · Cited by 2
Emerging role of pharmacoeconomics into clinical trials and its outcomes: An overview
Biswkarma, V. K., & Wadhawan, S. (2020) · Indian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology · doi:10.18231/j.ijpp.2020.014 · Cited by 2
Biltaji, E., Walker, B. S., Au, T. H., Rivers, Z. T., Ose, J., Li, C. I., Brixner, D. I., Stenehjem, D. D., & Ulrich, C. M. (2021) · Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-19-1580 · Cited by 2
Sample size calculation for recurrent event data with additive rates models
Zhu, L., Li, Y., Tang, Y., Shen, L., Onar‐Thomas, A., & Sun, J. (2021) · Pharmaceutical Statistics · doi:10.1002/pst.2154 · Cited by 2
McMeekin, N., Geue, C., Briggs, A. H., Rombach, I., Li, H. K., Bejon, P., McNally, M., Atkins, B. L., Ferguson, J. Y., Scarborough, M., et al. (2019) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15314.2 · Cited by 2
Self-citationMcMeekin, N., Geue, C., Briggs, A. H., Rombach, I., Li, H. K., Bejon, P., McNally, M., Atkins, B. L., Ferguson, J. Y., Scarborough, M., et al. (2019) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15314.1 · Cited by 2
Self-citationFew More Lessons Learnt from Covid-19: Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Perspective
Khan, I. A., & Malik, N. (2022) · National Journal of Community Medicine · doi:10.55489/njcm.130820222103 · Cited by 2
Lowenstein, L. M., Shih, Y. T., Minnix, J. A., Lopez-Olivo, M. A., Maki, K. G., Kypriotakis, G., Leal, V. B., Shete, S. S., Fox, J., Nishi, S. P. E., et al. (2023) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2023.107141 · Cited by 2
A review of heath economic evaluation practice in the Netherlands: are we moving forward?
Gabrio, A. (2023) · Health Economics Policy and Law · doi:10.1017/s1744133123000087 · Cited by 2
“Given the intrinsic complexity that characterise the analysis framework of health economic data, the choice of the analytical approaches to deal with these problems as well as transparent information on their implementation is crucial in determining the degree of confidence that decision-makers should have towards cos…”
BackgroundGandy, M., Coleman, H., Cutler, H., Jones, M., Karin, E., Kwan, P., Nikpour, A., Parratt, K. L., Rayner, G., Titov, N., et al. (2024) · Epilepsia Open · doi:10.1002/epi4.12913 · Cited by 2
Stimulation Therapy to Induce Mothers: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Tortal, D., Shabanova, V., Taylor, S., Xu, X., McAdow, M., Stetson, B., McCollum, S., Sanchez, E., Adjakple, A., Leventhal, J., et al. (2024) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/63463 · Cited by 2
“EQ-5D is a recommended and widely used instrument for measuring utility scores in clinical trials and in maternal health research [64,65].”
MethodPng, M. E., Dritsaki, M., Gray, A. M., Pinedo‐Villanueva, R., Rivero‐Arias, O., & Nanchahal, J. (2019) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14936.2 · Cited by 2
Health technology assessment of hyperphosphatemia management among hemodialysis patients in Lebanon
Rizk (2017) · doi:10.26481/dis.20170622rr · Cited by 2
“For instance, in the US in 2014, more than $26 billion were spent on hemodialysis patients ($87,638 per patient per year, in comparison with $73,612 for peritoneal dialysis and $32,586 for renal transplantation) [70].”
BackgroundGershon, N., & Berchenko, Y. (2018) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-018-0621-x · Cited by 2
“Currently, despite strong arguments in favor of including future costs [2], there are still conflicting guidelines [3, 4], and the vast majority of CEAs we reviewed did not consider future costs.”
BackgroundBlades, R. (2020) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.198193 · Cited by 2
Chaudhary, D., Bhat, B., Shields, G., Davies, L. M., Green, J., Verghis, T., Roy, R., Kumar, D., Abhilashi, M. K., Vajaratkar, V. P., et al. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-966313/v1 · Cited by 2
Ghani, Z., Saha, S., Jarl, J., Andersson, M., Berglund, J. S., & Anderberg, P. (2024) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-249009 · Cited by 2
Minimizing the Cost in Sample Size Computation
Luo, J. (2016) · Austin Biometrics and Biostatistics · doi:10.26420/austinbiomandbiostat.2016.1031 · Cited by 1
“There are a lot of publications about cost-effectiveness-design (see [6,7] and accompanying references), but our approaches are totally different from them since we focus on sample size allocation at the design stage.”
BackgroundLewandowska, M., Lourenço, R. D. A., Haas, M., Watson, C. J., Black, K. I., Taft, A., Lucke, J. C., McGeechan, K., McNamee, K., Peipert, J. F., et al. (2021) · Australian Health Review · doi:10.1071/ah20282 · Cited by 1
Afentou, N., Frew, E. J., Mehta, S. P., Ives, N. J., Woolley, R. L., Brettell, E. A., Khan, A. R., Milford, D. V., Böckenhauer, D., Saleem, M. A., et al. (2022) · PharmacoEconomics - Open · doi:10.1007/s41669-022-00334-6 · Cited by 1
“Unlike clinical-effectiveness analysis, which is based on the concept of classic statistical inference, economic evaluation is about decision analysis and is recommended by International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) guidance for trials that report a non-statistically significant differen…”
MethodSakai, K., Momosaki, R., & Hoshino, E. (2022) · Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation · doi:10.1186/s12962-022-00387-8 · Cited by 1
“To ensure external validity, a comparator should represent best or common practice [11].”
BackgroundDyreborg, L., Raunbak, S. M., Sørensen, S. S., Melgaard, D., & Westmark, S. (2023) · ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research · doi:10.2147/ceor.s431380 · Cited by 1
“The economic evaluation followed the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) guideline for conducting health economic evaluations alongside clinical trials 21 and the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) for economic evaluations.”
MethodChatterton, M. L., Faller, J., Le, L. K., Engel, L., Williams, L. J., Pasco, J. A., & Mihalopoulos, C. (2024) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/00048674241229931 · Cited by 1
“A gamma error distribution with a logarithmic link function in the GLM was used due to the skewed distribution of cost data consistent with the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcome Research guidelines (Ramsey et al., 2015).”
MethodGilworth, G., Harris, K., Morgan, T., Ayis, S. A., Fox-Rushby, J. A., Godfrey, E. L., Hopkinson, N. S., Lewin, S. A., Lim, K. K., Spinou, A., et al. (2024) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-024-07998-x · Cited by 2
“These economic evaluations will adopt the viewpoints of NHS and personal social services as well as that of society and be developed based on guidance for good practice, and decision support for NICE [40, 41].”
BackgroundSellinger, J. J., Rosen, M. I., Lazar, C. M., Gilstad‐Hayden, K., Dziura, J. D., Li, F., Mattocks, K. M., Weede, A., Sullivan-Tibbs, M. A., Rose, L., et al. (2024) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnae062 · Cited by 2
Análise econômica das terapias hemodiálise e diálise peritoneal de início urgente
Brabo, A. M., Dias, D. B., da Silva, E. N., & Ponce, D. (2025) · Brazilian Journal of Nephrology · doi:10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2024-0051pt · Cited by 1
Shetty, S. S., Duckworth, M., Norman, R., Affandi, J. S., Dawson, S. N., Fox-Rushby, J. A., & On behalf of NOTACS investigators (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0311861 · Cited by 1
Allemeersch, F., Lierde, K. M. V., Verhaeghe, N., Bettens, K., Mouton, T., Hens, G., & Alighieri, C. (2025) · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · doi:10.1111/1460-6984.70019 · Cited by 1
Murray, J., Baxter, R., O'Hara, J. K., Sheard, L., Hewitt, C. E., Hardicre, N., Vincent, C. A., Oikonomou, E., Richardson, G. A., Shannon, R., et al. (2025) · Programme Grants for Applied Research · doi:10.3310/kmng5684 · Cited by 2
Wang, Y., McCarthy, A. L., & Tuffaha, H. (2025) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x251332967 · Cited by 1
Grad, D. A., Strilciuc, Ș., Vlădescu, C., Buzoianu, A. D., Albu, C. V., & Muresanu, D. F. (2025) · Journal of Medicine and Life · doi:10.25122/jml-2025-0087 · Cited by 1
Bommhardt, T., Peschl, J., Schultze-Lutter, F., Koutsouleris, N., Meisenzahl, E. M., & Köberlein–Neu, J. (2025) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103151 · Cited by 1
“Furthermore, deterministic sensitivity analyses will be performed with varying discount rates for cost and effects between 0% and 5%.”
Round, J. A., Akpinar, İ., Yan, C., Patel, N., van Katwyk, S., Montgomery, C., Wald, R., Bagshaw, S. M., STARRT-AKI Investigators, Bellomo, R., et al. (2025) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.35343 · Cited by 1
Wang, X., Zhao, F.-L., Newby, D., Gao, L., & Li, S. C. (2025) · PharmacoEconomics - Open · doi:10.1007/s41669-025-00606-x · Cited by 1
“Nonetheless, the method is recognised as a valuable tool that is easy to carry out and could provide the essential information needed for decision makers to identify the least costly alternative, especially among interventions with equivalent clinical outcomes [41].”
Gavan, S. P., Payne, K., Dixon, W. G., van der Veer, S. N., Tam, A. C. T., & Bansback, N. J. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01898-3 · Cited by 1
“Cost-effectiveness analyses can be embedded alongside a randomised controlled trial (RCT) or may use a decision-analytic modelling framework to simulate cost and health outcomes per patient over a longer time horizon 21,22 .”
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramsey, S. D., Willke, R. J., Glick, H., Reed, S. D., Augustovski, F., Jonsson, B., Briggs, A., & Sullivan, S. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Pfizer (United States) (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR)
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Ramsey, Scott D.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Value in Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-172
- ISSN
- 1098-3015 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2139814250
- Cited by
- 811
- References
- 184
- Citations by year
- 2026: 58 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 103 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 6
- FWCI
- 17.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Value in Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
- Keywords
- cost-effectiveness analysis, clinical trials, economic evaluation, trial design, health care utilization, health utility, intention-to-treat analysis, subgroup analysis, uncertainty characterization, reporting guidelines, reimbursement decisions, healthcare resource allocation
- MeSH terms
- Cost-Benefit Analysis, Health Policy, Health Services Research, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Advisory Committees, Research Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review