The DOI matches its Crossref record; 183 of the 184 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Alongside Clinical Trials II—An ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force Report
Open accessAbstract
Clinical trials evaluating medicines, medical devices, and procedures now commonly assess the economic value of these interventions. The growing number of prospective clinical/economic trials reflects both widespread interest in economic information for new technologies and the regulatory and reimbursement requirements of many countries that now consider evidence of economic value along with clinical efficacy. As decision makers increasingly demand evidence of economic value for health care interventions, conducting high-quality economic analyses alongside clinical studies is desirable because they broaden the scope of information available on a particular intervention, and can efficiently provide timely information with high internal and, when designed and analyzed properly, reasonable external validity. In 2005, ISPOR published the Good Research Practices for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Alongside Clinical Trials: The ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force report. ISPOR initiated an update of the report in 2014 to include the methodological developments over the last 9 years. This report provides updated recommendations reflecting advances in several areas related to trial design, selecting data elements, database design and management, analysis, and reporting of results. Task force members note that trials should be designed to evaluate effectiveness (rather than efficacy) when possible, should include clinical outcome measures, and should obtain health resource use and health state utilities directly from study subjects. Collection of economic data should be fully integrated into the study. An incremental analysis should be conducted with an intention-to-treat approach, complemented by relevant subgroup analyses. Uncertainty should be characterized. Articles should adhere to established standards for reporting results of cost-effectiveness analyses. Economic studies alongside trials are complementary to other evaluations (e.g., modeling studies) as information for decision makers who consider evidence of economic value along with clinical efficacy when making resource allocation decisions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The economic evaluation will be performed from a societal perspective, and all analyses will be conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle, in which we adhere to the related guidelines [67–69].”
In the citing paper
“For example, parameter uncertainty will be covered by, for example, sensitivity analyses in which imputed uncertainty is also taken into account by repeating the economic evaluation on the imputed dataset and sampling uncertainty will be taken into account by providing a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve and frontier [67].”
In the citing paper
“Best practice within-trial economic evaluation methods will be adopted53”
Citations
Cites
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994) · doi:10.1201/9780429246593 · Cited by 40,500
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
Rubin, D. B. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316696 · Cited by 20,701
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Lahiff, M., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289883 · Cited by 17,385
Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
Drummond, M. E., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198529446.001.0001 · Cited by 13,648
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
the CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-18 · Cited by 13,371
Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
Herdman, M., Gudex, C., Lloyd, A., Janssen, M., Kind, P., Parkin, D., Bonsel, G., & Badia, X. (2011) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x · Cited by 9,795
Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine
(1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195108248.001.0001 · Cited by 7,193
Awais, A. (2015) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · doi:10.17632/zcvgc6m58h.1 · Cited by 6,790
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Ghosh, S., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1988) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269814 · Cited by 4,730
(1997) · doi:10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002 · Cited by 4,544
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 184 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Sullivan, 2001, Design and analytic considerations in determining the cost-effectiveness of early intervention in asthma from a multinational clinical trial, Control Clin Trials, 22, 420, 10.1016/S0197-2456(01)00137-4 · DOI
- Barber, 2000, Analysis of cost data in randomized trials: an application of the nonparametric bootstrap, Stat Med, 19, 3219, 10.1002/1097-0258(20001215)19:23<3219::AID-SIM623>3.0.CO;2-P · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 810
Augustovski, F., Chaparro, M., Palacios, A., Shi, L., Beratarrechea, A. G., Irazola, V. E., Rubinstein, A., Mills, K. T., He, J., & Pichón-Rivière, A. (2018) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2018.06.003 · Cited by 37
“Analyses were conducted following state-of-the-art methods of trial-based economic evaluation.(11) The Institutional Review Boards of Tulane University in the US and Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires in Argentina approved the study protocol with the planned economic evaluation.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationBruce, J., Hossain, A., Lall, R., Withers, E. J., Finnegan, S., Underwood, M. R., Ji, C., Bojke, C., Longo, R., Hulme, C. T., et al. (2021) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta25340 · Cited by 39
Operationalising treatment success in aphasia rehabilitation
Breitenstein, C., Hilari, K., Menahemi-Falkov, M., Rose, M. L., Wallace, S. J., Brady, M., Hillis, A. E., Kiran, S., Szaflarski, J. P., Tippett, D. C., et al. (2022) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2021.2016594 · Cited by 37
“These analyses should adhere to established guidelines such as those laid out by the Task Force report of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Randomized Clinical Trials - Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (ISPOR RCT-CEA; Ramsey et al., 2015) or by the European Stroke Organisation Health Eco…”
MethodHusereau, D., Drummond, M., Augustovski, F., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Briggs, A. H., Carswell, C., Caulley, L., Chaiyakunapruk, N., Greenberg, D., Loder, E., et al. (2022) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-021-01426-6 · Cited by 41
Self-citationTaylor, C. B., Thompson, K., Finfer, S. R., Higgins, A. M., Jan, S., Li, Q., Liu, B. C., & Myburgh, J. (2016) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(16)30120-5 · Cited by 36
McCaffrey, N., Bucholc, J., Rand, S. E., Hoefman, R., Ugalde, A., Muldowney, A., Mihalopoulos, C., & Engel, L. (2020) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2020.07.005 · Cited by 37
Christensen, K. D., Vassy, J. L., Phillips, K. A., Zawatsky, C. L. B., Azzariti, D. R., Lu, C. Y., Robinson, J. O., Lee, K., Douglas, M. P., Yeh, J. M., et al. (2018) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/gim.2018.35 · Cited by 35
Le, L. K.-D., Sanci, L., Chatterton, M. L., Kauer, S., Buhagiar, K., & Mihalopoulos, C. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/13065 · Cited by 35
“GLM using log link and gamma family was used for cost variables as recommended by the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcome Research guidelines [33].”
Kuznik, A., Smare, C., Chen, C.-I., Venkatachalam, M., Keeping, S., Atsou, K., Xu, Y., Wilson, F. R., Guyot, P., Chan, K., et al. (2021) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2021.08.009 · Cited by 36
Tinazzi, M., Gandolfi, M., Landi, S., & Leardini, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.786126 · Cited by 35
“In the absence of a validated instrument for FMDs, we developed a customized questionnaire for collecting resource use data (26).”
MethodA cluster-randomized trial to reduce caesarean delivery rates in Quebec: cost-effectiveness analysis
Johri, M., Ng, E. S. W., Bermúdez‐Tamayo, C., Hoch, J. S., Ducruet, T., & Chaillet, N. (2017) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-017-0859-8 · Cited by 34
“Costs and health outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 0% due to the short (<1 year) period for results assessment [9, 10].”
BackgroundGilson, R. J. C., Nugent, D., Bennett, K., Doré, C. J., Murray, M. L., Meadows, J., Haddow, L. J., Lacey, C. J., Sandmann, F., Jit, M., et al. (2020) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta24470 · Cited by 34
Dixon, S., Hill, H. R., Flight, L., Khetrapal, P., Ambler, G., Williams, N. R., Brew‐Graves, C., Kelly, J. D., Catto, J. W. F., iROC Study Team, et al. (2023) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17255 · Cited by 33
Saarijärvi, M., Wallin, L., Moons, P., Gyllensten, H., & Bratt, E. (2020) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-020-01088-7 · Cited by 32
Calon, T. G. A., van Hoof, M., van den Berge, H., de Bruijn, A. J. G., van Tongeren, J., Hof, J. R., Brunings, J. W., Jonhede, S., Anteunis, L. J. C., Janssen, A. M. L., et al. (2016) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1662-0 · Cited by 33
“The evaluation will be performed according to the standards and guidelines of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) [50].”
MethodBaumeister, H., Bauereiss, N., Zarski, A.-C., Braun, L., Buntrock, C., Hoherz, C., Idrees, A. R., Kraft, R., Meyer, P., Nguyen, T. B. D., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.660534 · Cited by 30
“Cost-effectiveness analyses will be reported according to Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement [CHEERS; (41)] and the guidelines from the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research [ISPOR; (42)].”
MethodStopeck, A., Brufsky, A., Kennedy, L., Bhatta, S., Bhowmik, D., Buchanan, J., Despiégel, N., & Hechmati, G. (2019) · Journal of Medical Economics · doi:10.1080/13696998.2019.1651122 · Cited by 32
McMeekin, N., Geue, C., Briggs, A. H., Rombach, I., Li, H. K., Bejon, P., McNally, M., Atkins, B. L., Ferguson, J. Y., Scarborough, M., et al. (2019) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15314.3 · Cited by 32
Self-citationShen, C., Tannenbaum, D., Horn, R. G., Rogers, J. E., Eng, C., Zhou, S., Johnson, B., Kopetz, S., Morris, V. K., Overman, M. J., et al. (2022) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.13588 · Cited by 32
Malhotra, A., Thompson, R. R., Kagoya, F., Masiye, F., Mbewe, P., Mosepele, M., Phiri, J., Sambo, J., Barker, A. R., Cameron, D., et al. (2022) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-022-01248-x · Cited by 33
“, annual re-trainings of personnel) [2, 3].”
Paganini, S., Lin, J., Kählke, F., Buntrock, C., Leiding, D., Ebert, D. D., & Baumeister, H. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023390 · Cited by 31
“25 The economic evaluation was conducted and reported in agreement with the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement(26) and the International Society For Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) guidelines.(27) In total, 302 participants were recruited from October 2014 to…”
The Pathways to Prevention program: nutrition as prevention for improved cancer outcomes
Hiatt, R. A., Clayton, M. F., Collins, K. K., Gold, H. T., Laiyemo, A. O., Truesdale, K. P., & Ritzwoller, D. P. (2023) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djad079 · Cited by 32
“15 RCTs of nutritional interventions (69,70) that incorporate CEAs.”
BackgroundSapanel, Y., Tadeo, X., Brenna, C. T. A., Remus, A., Koerber, F., Cloutier, L. M., Tremblay, G., Blasiak, A., Hardesty, C. L., Yoong, J., et al. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/47094 · Cited by 31
The Cost-Effectiveness of Financial Incentives for Viral Suppression: HPTN 065 Study
Adamson, B. J. S., El-Sadr, W. M., Dimitrov, D., Gamble, T., Beauchamp, G. G., Carlson, J. J., Garrison, L. P., & Donnell, D. J. (2018) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2018.09.001 · Cited by 31
“Our analytic methods and reporting follow guidelines from the Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine [40,41], the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research - Society for Medical Decision Making Task Force on Good Research Practices for Randomized Clinical Trials Cost-Effectiv…”
MethodSullivan, P. W., Li, Q., Bilir, S. P., Dang, J., Kavati, A., Yang, M., & Rajput, Y. (2019) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1080/03007995.2019.1660539 · Cited by 30
Beunen, K., Wilder, N. V., Ballaux, D., Vanhaverbeke, G., Taes, Y., Aers, X.-P., Nobels, F. R. E., Marlier, J., Lee, D. Y., Cuypers, J., et al. (2023) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-023-05481-0 · Cited by 31
Kim, H., Gill, B. S., Beriwal, S., Huq, M. S., Roberts, M. S., & Smith, K. J. (2016) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.02.045 · Cited by 32
The pharmacy care plan service: Evaluation and estimate of cost-effectiveness
Twigg, M. J., Wright, D. J., Barton, G., Kirkdale, C. L., & Thornley, T. (2018) · Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.062 · Cited by 31
Puts, M. T. E., Hsu, T., Mariano, C. J., Monette, J., Brennenstuhl, S., Pitters, E., Ray, J., Wan-Chow-Wah, D., Kozlowski, N., Krzyzanowska, M. K., et al. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024485 · Cited by 30
“Cost-effectiveness will be determined alongside the clinical trial following standard guidelines.(40) We will use two methods to collect data needed for the cost-effectiveness analyses: (a) EuroQol-5 dimensions with five levels (EQ-5D-5L)(41): the EQ-5D-5L is a well-validated, widely used, generic instrument that meas…”
MethodMangin, D. A., Lamarche, L., Agarwal, G., Banh, H. L., Brown, N. D., Cassels, A., Colwill, K., Dolovich, L. R., Farrell, B. J., Garrison, S., et al. (2021) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-021-05685-9 · Cited by 30
Assessing the Impact of EQ-5D Country-specific Value Sets on Cost-utility Outcomes
van Dongen, J. M., Ben, Â. J., Finch, A. P., Rossenaar, M. M. M., Biesheuvel-Leliefeld, K. E. M., Apeldoorn, A. T., Ostelo, R., van Tulder, M. W., van Marwijk, H., & Bosmans, J. E. (2020) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0000000000001417 · Cited by 29
McFerran, E., O’Mahony, J. F., Fallis, R., McVicar, D., Zauber, A. G., & Kee, F. (2017) · Epidemiologic Reviews · doi:10.1093/epirev/mxx002 · Cited by 29
“The use of a preference-weighted health-state classification system, such as EuroQol-5D (a descriptive system comprising the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) (73), was not consistently reported.”
MethodWillems, R. P., Annemans, L., Siopis, G., Moschonis, G., Vedanthan, R., Jung, J., Kwaśnicka, D., Oldenburg, B. F., D’Antonio, C., Girolami, S., et al. (2023) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00876-x · Cited by 30
“It is strongly recommended to consistently include a cost-effectiveness work package alongside clinical trials 55 .”
BackgroundHuang, L., Roberts, C. T., Manley, B. J., Owen, L. S., Davis, P. G., & Dalziel, K. (2018) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.12.072 · Cited by 28
Gallagher, T. K., Kelly, M. E., & Hoti, E. (2019) · BJS Open · doi:10.1002/bjs5.50120 · Cited by 28
Park, J., Angenete, E., Bock, D., Marinez, A. C., Danielsen, A. K., Gehrman, J., Haglind, E., Jansen, J. E., Skullman, S., Wedin, A., et al. (2019) · Surgical Endoscopy · doi:10.1007/s00464-019-06732-y · Cited by 28
Nagendra, D., Koelper, N., Loza-Avalos, S. E., Sonalkar, S., Chen, M., Atrio, J., Schreiber, C. A., & Harvie, H. S. (2020) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1594 · Cited by 29
First-line oxygen therapy with high-flow in bronchiolitis is not cost saving for the health service
Gc, V. S., Franklin, D., Whitty, J. A., Dalziel, S. R., Babl, F. E., Schlapbach, L. J., Fraser, J. F., Craig, S. S., Neutze, J. M., Oakley, E. A., et al. (2020) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/archdischild-2019-318427 · Cited by 28
“20 For the base case analysis, Australian unit costs were applied to all resources used regardless of the trial site.”
Armstrong-Buisseret, L., Brittain, C., Kai, J., David, M. D., Watkins, J. A., Ozolins, M., Jackson, L., Abdali, Z., Hepburn, T., Griffiths, F., et al. (2022) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/zzkh4176 · Cited by 28
Khunti, K., Griffin, S. J., Brennan, A., Dallosso, H. M., Davies, M. J., Eborall, H., Edwardson, C. L., Gray, L. J., Hardeman, W., Heathcote, L., et al. (2021) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta25770 · Cited by 33
Pérez‐Aranda, A., D’Amico, F., Feliu‐Soler, A., McCracken, L. M., Peñarrubia‐María, M. T., Andrés‐Rodríguez, L., Angarita‐Osorio, N., Knapp, M. R. J., García‐Campayo, J., & Luciano, J. V. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm8071068 · Cited by 29
“The present economic evaluation is reported according to the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement [45] (see Table S1) and follows the Good Research Practices for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Alongside Clinical Trials [46].”
MethodYan, C., Rittenbach, K., Souri, S., & Silverstone, P. H. (2019) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-019-2223-3 · Cited by 31
“arm was applied for the analysis; this approach was utilized to avoid bias [31, 33].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRetèl, V. P., Byng, D., Linn, S. C., Jóźwiak, K., Koffijberg, H., Rutgers, E. J. T., Cardoso, F., Piccart, M. J., Poncet, C., Veer, L. J. V., et al. (2020) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2020.07.002 · Cited by 27
“This is the best available evidence to model recurrence and survival outcomes and their impact on cost-effectiveness with a high level of accuracy [6,28].”
BackgroundMethodEvaluating the clinical benefit of brain-computer interfaces for control of a personal computer
Fry, A., Chan, A. H. W., Harel, N. Y., Spielman, L. A., Escalon, M. X., & Putrino, D. F. (2022) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ac60ca · Cited by 27
“Early and regular collection of economic data alongside effectiveness data has therefore been recommended to facilitate the translation of BCI prototypes to clinically available products [90].”
Verdoorn, S., van de Pol, J. M., Hövels, A. M., Kwint, H., Blom, J. W., Gussekloo, J., & Bouvy, M. L. (2020) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bcp.14421 · Cited by 27
“For studies to measure the cost-effectiveness of CMR, they should ideally measure HR-QoL and estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).(20) However, many interventions that are performed during CMR are unlikely to improve HR-QoL for the short term (e.”
BackgroundTozan, Y., Capasso, A., Sun, S., Neilands, T. B., Damulira, C., Namuwonge, F., Nakigozi, G. F., Mwebembezi, A., Mukasa, B., Bahar, O. S., et al. (2021) · Journal of the International AIDS Society · doi:10.1002/jia2.25752 · Cited by 26
“We also conducted a sensitivity analysis [27] in which we computed the ICERs for a pessimistic scenario (high cost/low effectiveness) and an optimistic scenario (low cost/high effectiveness) for the intervention.”
MethodReimbursed Price of Orphan Drugs: Current Strategies and Potential Improvements
Mincarone, P., Leo, C. G., Sabina, S., Sarría‐Santamera, A., Taruscio, D., Serrano‐Aguilar, P., & Kanavos, P. G. (2017) · Public Health Genomics · doi:10.1159/000464100 · Cited by 26
Gabrio, A., Mason, A. J., & Baio, G. (2018) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.8045 · Cited by 26
“[27] Ramsey SD, Willke RJ, Glick H, et al.”
BackgroundRaje, N., Roodman, G. D., Willenbacher, W., Shimizu, K., García-Sanz, R., Terpos, E., Kennedy, L., Sabatelli, L., Intorcia, M., & Hechmati, G. (2018) · Journal of Medical Economics · doi:10.1080/13696998.2018.1445634 · Cited by 25
Cost-utility analysis in orthopaedic trauma; what pays? A systematic review
Coyle, S., Kinsella, S., Lenehan, B. J., & Queally, J. M. (2018) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2018.01.029 · Cited by 25
“Both methods ultimately generate a utility measure in the form of QALYs for use in a CUA [32].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialInterpretation of trial-based economic evaluations of musculoskeletal physical therapy interventions
Miyamoto, G. C., Ben, Â. J., Bosmans, J. E., van Tulder, M. W., Lin, C. C., Cabral, C. M. N., & van Dongen, J. M. (2021) · Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.06.011 · Cited by 24
“44 In economic evaluations conducted alongside randomized controlled trials, patients are randomly allocated to one of the interventions and patient-level cost and effect data are gathered prospectively during follow-up.(32,34,36,41) It is also possible to conduct a trial-based economic evaluation alongside a non-rand…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialParimbelli, E., Soldati, F., Duchoud, L., Armas, G., de Almeida, J. D., Broglie, M., Quaglini, S., & Simon, C. (2021) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-021-07149-x · Cited by 22
Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Augustovski, F., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Briggs, A. H., Carswell, C., Caulley, L., Chaiyakunapruk, N., Greenberg, D., Loder, E., et al. (2022) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-021-07460-7 · Cited by 26
Self-citationHusereau, D., Drummond, M., Augustovski, F., de Bekker-Grob, E. W., Briggs, A. H., Carswell, C., Caulley, L., Chaiyakunapruk, N., Greenberg, D., Loder, E., et al. (2022) · Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy · doi:10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.2.146 · Cited by 27
Self-citationSustainable Financing of Innovative Therapies: A Review of Approaches
Hollis, A. (2016) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-016-0416-x · Cited by 26
A hospital cost analysis of a fibrin sealant patch in soft tissue and hepatic surgical bleeding
Ferko, N. C., Corral, M., Hogan, A., Hollmann, S., Gangoli, G., Jamous, N., Batiller, J., & Kocharian, R. (2016) · ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research · doi:10.2147/ceor.s112762 · Cited by 25
Singh, K., Chandrasekaran, A. M., Bhaumik, S., Chattopadhyay, K., Gamage, A. U., de Silva, P., Roy, A., Prabhakaran, D., & Tandon, N. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017809 · Cited by 25
Creating a pragmatic trials program for breast cancer patients: Rethinking Clinical Trials (REaCT)
Basulaiman, B. M., Awan, A. A., Fergusson, D. A., Vandermeer, L., Arnaout, A., Hilton, J. F., Hutton, B., Joy, A. A., Robinson, A. G., Califaretti, N., et al. (2019) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-019-05274-0 · Cited by 25
Weiss, L., Voshaar, M. A. H. O., Bohlmeijer, E. T., & Westerhof, G. J. (2020) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s12955-020-01416-x · Cited by 27
Sørensen, S. S., Storgaard, L. H., & Weinreich, U. M. (2021) · ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research · doi:10.2147/ceor.s312523 · Cited by 24
“The analysis was conducted as a within-trial analysis and was performed in accordance with international guidelines.(26,27) The time horizon of the CUA followed that of the clinical trial, ie 12 months; hence, no discounting was performed.”
MethodCost, Value, and Financial Hardship in Cancer Care: Implications for Pediatric Oncology
Parsons, S. K., Castellino, S. M., & Yabroff, K. R. (2018) · American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book · doi:10.1200/edbk_200359 · Cited by 26
Bojke, L., Schmitt, L. H. M., Lomas, J. R. S., Richardson, G. A., & Weatherly, H. L. A. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15112459 · Cited by 24
“more generic g idance relating to the conduct of single study (usually trial-based) [5] and model-based economic evaluations [6].”
BackgroundLe, L. K., Shih, S. T. F., Richards‐Jones, S., Chatterton, M. L., Engel, L., Stevenson, C., Lawrence, D. M., Pépin, G., & Mihalopoulos, C. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0249902 · Cited by 24
“As recommended by the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcome Research guidelines, a gamma error distribution with a logarithmic link function was used in the GLM to model the skewed distribution of the data [20].”
MethodZhang, Z., Dawkins, B., Hicks, J. P., Walley, J. D., Hulme, C. T., Elsey, H., Deng, S., Lin, M., Zeng, J., & Wei, X. (2018) · Tropical Medicine & International Health · doi:10.1111/tmi.13132 · Cited by 24
“The level of sampling uncertainty around the ICER was determined using a non-parametric bootstrap, specifying clusters defined by the township hospital and strata defined by the county in which the hospital was located, to generate 10 000 estimates of incremental cost and benefits which were plotted on the cost-effect…”
McMeekin, N., Geue, C., Briggs, A. H., Rombach, I., Li, H. K., Bejon, P., McNally, M., Atkins, B. L., Ferguson, J. Y., Scarborough, M., et al. (2020) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15314.4 · Cited by 24
Self-citationCarlson, J. J., FOOS, V., Kasle, A., Mugwagwa, T., Draica, F., Wiemken, T. L., Nguyen, J. L., Cha-Silva, A. S., Migliaccio–Walle, K., & Dzingina, M. (2023) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2023.11.003 · Cited by 24
Williams, E. V., Goranitis, I., Oppong, R., Perry, S. J., Devall, A., Martín, J., Mammoliti, K., Beeson, L. E., Sindhu, K. N., Galadanci, H. S., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03069-5 · Cited by 23
“Given that composite outcomes are generally inadequate for economic evaluation due to varying component importance, disaggregation is recommended 16 .”
Costa, S., Cary, M., Helling, D. K., Pereira, J., & Mateus, C. (2019) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-019-1177-3 · Cited by 24
Glickman, A., Brennecke, A., Tayebnejad, A., Matsuo, K., Guntupalli, S. R., & Sheeder, J. L. (2020) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.07.096 · Cited by 23
Almazrou, S. H., AlAujan, S. S., & Al-Aqeel, S. (2021) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-021-00721-1 · Cited by 27
“DIRUM is also recommended by the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research to collect healthcare resource use data [47].”
MethodKirkpatrick, T., Lennox, C., Taylor, R. S., Anderson, R., Maguire, M., Haddad, M., Michie, S., Owens, C. V., Durcan, G., Stirzaker, A., et al. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017931 · Cited by 23
“conducting trial-based economic evaluation.(58) Consistent with the analytical approach used in the statistical analysis of the effectiveness outcomes of the RCT where possible; the cost-effectiveness analysis will be reported in accordance with the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards.”
Gao, L., Sheppard, L., Wu, O., Churilov, L. P., Mohebbi, M., Collier, J. M., Bernhardt, J. A., Ellery, F., Dewey, H. M., & Moodie, M. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026230 · Cited by 23
“sensitivity analyses To investigate the impact of using country-specific costs, a country dummy variable was added to the GLM analysis to adjust for country effect.(25) Subgroup analysis on the basis of individual countries were also conducted to explore the difference in costs and benefits across countries.”
BackgroundMethodMartín‐Fernández, J., Morey-Montalvo, M., Tomás-García, N., Martín-Ramos, E., Muñoz-García, J. C., Polentinos-Castro, E., Rodríguez-Martínez, G., Arenaza, J. C., García‐Pérez, L., Magdalena-Armas, L., et al. (2020) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s12955-020-01435-8 · Cited by 24
“Health state preference scores can be transformed into quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), which are an outcome metric for health benefit used in many health economic evaluations [2].”
BackgroundBuntrock, C., Lehr, D., Smit, F., Horvath, H., Berking, M., Spiegelhalder, K., Riper, H. M., & Ebert, D. D. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/25609 · Cited by 22
Cost–Benefit Analysis of the COPE Program for Persons Living With Dementia: Toward a Payment Model
Pizzi, L. T., Jutkowitz, E., Prioli, K. M., Lu, E., Babcock, Z. R., McAbee‐Sevick, H., Wakefield, D. B., Robison, J. T., Molony, S. L., Piersol, C. V., et al. (2021) · Innovation in Aging · doi:10.1093/geroni/igab042 · Cited by 22
“This is common for cost assessments conducted alongside clinical trials (45).”
BackgroundEconomic evaluation of healthcare interventions: old and new directions: Table 1:
Gray, A. M., & Wilkinson, T. (2016) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/grv020 · Cited by 22
Cost‐Effectiveness Analysis of Second‐Line Chemotherapy Agents for Advanced Gastric Cancer
Lam, S. W., Wai, M., Lau, J. E., McNamara, M. J., Earl, M. A., & Udeh, B. L. (2016) · Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · doi:10.1002/phar.1870 · Cited by 22
“Both future costs and clinical outcomes were discounted at 3% annually.(11) Half-cycle correction was used.”
MethodKim, H., Rajagopalan, M. S., Beriwal, S., & Smith, K. J. (2017) · Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.clon.2017.05.001 · Cited by 22
Irvine, A. D., Jones, A. P., Beattie, P. E., Baron, S. E., Browne, F., Ashoor, F., O’Neill, L. M., Rosala‐Hallas, A., Sach, T., Spowart, C., et al. (2018) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.16717 · Cited by 22
Henderson, C., Dixon, S., Bauer, A., Knapp, M., Morrell, C. J., Slade, P., Walters, S. J., & Brugha, T. (2019) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291718001940 · Cited by 21
“Our cost-effectiveness analysis adopted methods consistent with good practice guidelines (Ramsey et al., 2015) and employed methods relevant to clustered data, but the choice of analytical model can influence results (Mantopoulos et al., 2016) and so is a source of methodological uncertainty.”
MethodMaas, E. T., Juch, J. N. S., Ostelo, R., Groeneweg, G., Kallewaard, J. W., Koes, B. W., Verhagen, A. P., van Dongen, J. M., van Tulder, M. W., & Huygen, F. J. P. M. (2020) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2019.12.009 · Cited by 22
“Medication 351 (47) 196 (50) 155 (17-281) 156 (5-300)”
BackgroundLarsen, E. N., Corley, A., Mitchell, M. L., Lye, I., Powell, M., Tom, S., Mihala, G., Ullman, A. J., Gibson, V., Marsh, N. M., et al. (2020) · Australian Critical Care · doi:10.1016/j.aucc.2020.05.004 · Cited by 21
Hykin, P. G., Prevost, A. T., Sivaprasad, S., Vasconcelos, J. C., Murphy, C., Kelly, J., Ramu, J., Alshreef, A., Flight, L., Pennington, B., et al. (2021) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta25380 · Cited by 21
Economic evaluations and costing studies of lung transplantation: A scoping review
Peel, J. K., Keshavjee, S. H., Krahn, M. D., & Sander, B. (2021) · The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation · doi:10.1016/j.healun.2021.08.007 · Cited by 22
“Cost‐effectiveness of ACL treatment is dependent on age and activity level: a systematic review”
Deviandri, R., van der Veen, H. C., Lubis, A. M. T., van den Akker‐Scheek, I., & Postma, M. J. (2022) · Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-022-07087-z · Cited by 20
Clayton, G. L., Smith, I. L., Higgins, J. P. T., Mihaylova, B., Thorpe, B., Cicero, R., Lokuge, K., Forman, J., Tierney, J. F., White, I. R., et al. (2017) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1955-y · Cited by 22
“Trial-based economic analysis are sometimes secondary to the clinical aspect rather than being fully integrated within a trial design [29] meaning that the use of decision models and VoI analyses to inform trial design is limited.”
BackgroundMethodLow-intensity pulsed ultrasound for treatment of tibial fractures
Tarride, J., Hopkins, R. B., Blackhouse, G., Burke, N., Bhandari, M., Johal, H. S., Guyatt, G. H., & Busse, J. W. (2017) · The Bone & Joint Journal · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.99b11.bjj-2017-0737 · Cited by 22
Wang, M. L., Waring, M. E., Jake‐Schoffman, D. E., Oleski, J. L., Michaels, Z., Goetz, J. M., Lemon, S. C., Ma, Y., & Pagoto, S. (2017) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/resprot.8068 · Cited by 21
“…systematically track costs associated with delivery of both intervention conditions, capturing information on the costs that would be required to implement each intervention in practice (ie, outside the research context), including administrative, interventionists, and participant costs [36-38].”
Knott, R. J., Harris, A., Higgins, A. M., Nichol, A., French, C., Little, L., Haddad, S. H., Presneill, J., Arabi, Y. M., Bailey, M., et al. (2019) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2018.6229 · Cited by 22
“32 This meant that considerable uncertainty was observed in the trial-wide estimates for costs, and region-specific estimates for both Estimates calculated using method of recycled predictions from generalised linear models (costs), and Weibull regressions and multiple regressions (QALYs); 95%…”
InfluentialMüller, I., Stuart, B. L., Sach, T., Hooper, J., Wilczynska, S., Steele, M., Greenwell, K., Sivyer, K., Yardley, L., Williams, H. C., et al. (2021) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045583 · Cited by 21
“41 42 Missing data will be dealt with in line with the approach taken in the main clinical statistical analysis, with sensitivity analysis undertaken to test the impact of approach if missing data is a particular problem.”
Delnoij, T., Suverein, M. M., Essers, B. A. B., Hermanides, R. C., Otterspoor, L., Kraemer, C. V. E., Vlaar, A. P. J., van der Heijden, J., Scholten, E., den Uil, C. A., et al. (2024) · European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care · doi:10.1093/ehjacc/zuae050 · Cited by 20
Is Improved Survival in Early-Stage Pancreatic Cancer Worth the Extra Cost at High-Volume Centers?
Perry, L. M., Bateni, S. B., Bold, R. J., & Hoch, J. S. (2021) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.02.014 · Cited by 20
Zhang, Y., Yin, L., Mills, K. T., Chen, J., He, J., Palacios, A., Pichón-Rivière, A., Irazola, V. E., Augustovski, F., & Shi, L. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.22559 · Cited by 20
Self-citationAbdel‐Fattah, M., Chapple, C. R., Guerrero, K. L., Dixon, S., Cotterill, N., Ward, K., Hashim, H., Monga, A. K., Brown, K., Drake, M. J., et al. (2021) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-021-05661-3 · Cited by 20
“The within trial analysis will follow the best practice guidelines [40].”
MethodVelikova, G., Absolom, K. L., Hewison, J., Holch, P., Warrington, L., AVERY, K. N. L., Richards, H. S., Blazeby, J. M., Dawkins, B., Hulme, C. T., et al. (2022) · Programme Grants for Applied Research · doi:10.3310/fdde8516 · Cited by 21
Reporting and Analysis of Trial-Based Cost-Effectiveness Evaluations in Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Alili, M. E., van Dongen, J. M., Huirne, J. A. F., van Tulder, M. W., & Bosmans, J. E. (2017) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-017-0531-3 · Cited by 20
“Handling of missing data: Multiple imputation (MI) is currently considered the most appropriate method for dealing with missing cost data [13, 14], while maximum likelihood approaches (e.”
MethodWebb, N. J. A., Woolley, R. L., Lambe, T., Frew, E. J., Brettell, E. A., Barsoum, E., Trompeter, R. S., Cummins, C., Wheatley, K., & Ives, N. J. (2019) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta23260 · Cited by 20
Michels, C. T. J., Wijburg, C. J., Hannink, G., Witjes, J. A., Rovers, M. M., Grutters, J. P. C., Helder, S., Venderbosch, G. W. J., Calsbeek, H., Wijburg, C. J., et al. (2021) · European Urology Focus · doi:10.1016/j.euf.2021.06.004 · Cited by 19
Ghani, Z., Saha, S., Jarl, J., Andersson, M., Berglund, J. S., & Anderberg, P. (2022) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-215013 · Cited by 19
Diretriz metodológica para estudos de avaliação econômica de tecnologias em saúde no Brasil
Ribeiro, R. A., Neyeloff, J. L., Itria, A., Santos, V. C. C., Vianna, C. M. D. M., da Silva, E. N., Elias, F. T. S., Wichmann, R. M., Souza, K. M., Cruz, L. N., et al. (2016) · Jornal Brasileiro de Economia da Saúde · doi:10.21115/jbes.v8.n3.p174-184 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramsey, S. D., Willke, R. J., Glick, H., Reed, S. D., Augustovski, F., Jonsson, B., Briggs, A., & Sullivan, S. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Pfizer (United States) (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR)
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Ramsey, Scott D.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Value in Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-172
- ISSN
- 1098-3015 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2139814250
- Cited by
- 811
- References
- 184
- Citations by year
- 2026: 58 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 103 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 6
- FWCI
- 17.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Value in Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
- Keywords
- cost-effectiveness analysis, clinical trials, economic evaluation, trial design, health care utilization, health utility, intention-to-treat analysis, subgroup analysis, uncertainty characterization, reporting guidelines, reimbursement decisions, healthcare resource allocation
- MeSH terms
- Cost-Benefit Analysis, Health Policy, Health Services Research, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Advisory Committees, Research Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review