The DOI matches its Crossref record; 183 of the 184 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Alongside Clinical Trials II—An ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force Report
Open accessAbstract
Clinical trials evaluating medicines, medical devices, and procedures now commonly assess the economic value of these interventions. The growing number of prospective clinical/economic trials reflects both widespread interest in economic information for new technologies and the regulatory and reimbursement requirements of many countries that now consider evidence of economic value along with clinical efficacy. As decision makers increasingly demand evidence of economic value for health care interventions, conducting high-quality economic analyses alongside clinical studies is desirable because they broaden the scope of information available on a particular intervention, and can efficiently provide timely information with high internal and, when designed and analyzed properly, reasonable external validity. In 2005, ISPOR published the Good Research Practices for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Alongside Clinical Trials: The ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force report. ISPOR initiated an update of the report in 2014 to include the methodological developments over the last 9 years. This report provides updated recommendations reflecting advances in several areas related to trial design, selecting data elements, database design and management, analysis, and reporting of results. Task force members note that trials should be designed to evaluate effectiveness (rather than efficacy) when possible, should include clinical outcome measures, and should obtain health resource use and health state utilities directly from study subjects. Collection of economic data should be fully integrated into the study. An incremental analysis should be conducted with an intention-to-treat approach, complemented by relevant subgroup analyses. Uncertainty should be characterized. Articles should adhere to established standards for reporting results of cost-effectiveness analyses. Economic studies alongside trials are complementary to other evaluations (e.g., modeling studies) as information for decision makers who consider evidence of economic value along with clinical efficacy when making resource allocation decisions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The economic evaluation will be performed from a societal perspective, and all analyses will be conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle, in which we adhere to the related guidelines [67–69].”
In the citing paper
“For example, parameter uncertainty will be covered by, for example, sensitivity analyses in which imputed uncertainty is also taken into account by repeating the economic evaluation on the imputed dataset and sampling uncertainty will be taken into account by providing a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve and frontier [67].”
In the citing paper
“Best practice within-trial economic evaluation methods will be adopted53”
Citations
Cites
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994) · doi:10.1201/9780429246593 · Cited by 40,500
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
Rubin, D. B. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316696 · Cited by 20,701
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Lahiff, M., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289883 · Cited by 17,385
Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
Drummond, M. E., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198529446.001.0001 · Cited by 13,648
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
the CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-18 · Cited by 13,371
Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
Herdman, M., Gudex, C., Lloyd, A., Janssen, M., Kind, P., Parkin, D., Bonsel, G., & Badia, X. (2011) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x · Cited by 9,795
Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine
(1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195108248.001.0001 · Cited by 7,193
Awais, A. (2015) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · doi:10.17632/zcvgc6m58h.1 · Cited by 6,790
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Ghosh, S., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1988) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269814 · Cited by 4,730
(1997) · doi:10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002 · Cited by 4,544
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 184 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Sullivan, 2001, Design and analytic considerations in determining the cost-effectiveness of early intervention in asthma from a multinational clinical trial, Control Clin Trials, 22, 420, 10.1016/S0197-2456(01)00137-4 · DOI
- Barber, 2000, Analysis of cost data in randomized trials: an application of the nonparametric bootstrap, Stat Med, 19, 3219, 10.1002/1097-0258(20001215)19:23<3219::AID-SIM623>3.0.CO;2-P · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 810
Wikerøy, A. K. B., Randsborg, P., Aas, E., Fuglesang, H. F. S., & Jakobsen, R. B. (2025) · Acta Orthopaedica · doi:10.2340/17453674.2025.44881 · Cited by 1
Bomhof, C., Löffler, J. P., Brugman, S., Lodder, P., van den End, A., van Dijk, M. K., van Westen, M., van Dam, L., Wielaard, I., Mensink, W., et al. (2025) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-025-07550-4 · Cited by 1
“The analyses will be conducted and reported following [118], the CHEERS 2022 statement [119] and the ISPOR good research practices task force report on cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials II [120].”
Le, D. Q., Le, L. K., Yap, M. B. H., Haslam, D. M., Higgins, D. J., Malacova, E., Scott, J. G., Lawrence, D. M., Mathews, B., & Mihalopoulos, C. (2025) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2025.107818 · Cited by 1
van Bentum, J. S., Wijnen, B. F. M., Bachrach, N., Creemers, D. H. M., van Dijk, M. K., Dingemanse, P., van Haaren, M., Stikkelbroek, Y. A. J., Van, H. L., Vrijsen, J. N., et al. (2025) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1080/14737167.2025.2604569 · Cited by 1
Hu, Y., Slavin, V., Enticott, J., & Callander, E. J. (2026) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/aogs.70094 · Cited by 2
Mentzelopoulos, S. D., Hartog, C. S., Tenge, T., Schwenkglenks, M. M., Piper, S., Barbier, M. C., Rusínová, K., Neukirchen, M., Schüürhuis, S., Jensen, H. I., et al. (2026) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108168 · Cited by 1
“36 Costs, QALYs and additional outcome parameters that may be of interest for the cost–consequence analysis part will initially be described using standard methods.”
Lopez, A., Gargano, M. A., Yang, H., Ogunsile, F. J., Li, N., Xie, Y., Jeyakumar, S., & Udeze, C. (2026) · Journal of Medical Economics · doi:10.1080/13696998.2026.2624971 · Cited by 2
Meher, S., Maher, A., Brocklehurst, P., Chappell, L. C., Ewer, A. K., Green, M., Hannan, F. M., Hinshaw, K., Hughes, M., Jackson, L., et al. (2026) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-026-09513-w · Cited by 1
Holly, T., Brun, M. K., Jørgensen, K. K., Goll, G. L., Sexton, J., Gehin, J. E., Kvien, T. K., Jahnsen, J., Provan, S. A., Bolstad, N., et al. (2026) · RMD Open · doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006329 · Cited by 1
“To explore sampling uncertainty in cost and health outcome data, we present standard deviations (SD) 35 and employed non-parametric bootstrapping (10 000 draws) because several variables were non-normally distributed.”
Cost-effectiveness and benefit-cost analyses of promoting handwashing with soap: A systematic review
Ross, I., Bath, D., Wells, J., Dreibelbis, R., Ejemot-Nwadiaro, R. I., Mills, J. E., Greco, G., Pitt, C., & Cumming, O. (2026) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004982 · Cited by 1
Globalization in the Healthcare Industry: Drivers, Risks, and Adaptation
Kész, A., & Balatoni, I. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14091177 · Cited by 1
“…addition to the traditional expectations of safety, efficacy, and quality, pharmaceutical companies are increasingly required to demonstrate the eco-https nomic value of their products for reimbursement and funding decisions, which creates new challenges for development and market strategies [27].”
Cost‐Effectiveness of Allergen Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review
Jacob, J., Fong, A., Joyce, C., Lloyd, M., Lowe, A., & Katelaris, C. H. (2026) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/all.70382 · Cited by 1
Rombey, T., Eckhardt, H., Quentin, W., Weber, Z., Buchka, S., Kiselev, J., Loidl, V., Mansmann, U., Schaller, S. J., Schmidt, K., et al. (2026) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-026-04933-6 · Cited by 1
“Development of the methods was based on the current ISPOR guidelines for cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials [30], standard works on health economic evaluation [31, 32], and a systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of prehabilitation before elective surgery conducted by the…”
InfluentialAnsari, M. R., Popli, A., & Burathi, R. (2026) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/pzag040 · Cited by 1
Walter, E., Eichhober, G., Voit, M., Alfanz, A., Atarac-Simic, E., Bauer, B., Celedin, A., Gansch, K., Hauer, K., Holzhauser, C., et al. (2026) · Journal of Medical Economics · doi:10.1080/13696998.2026.2678777 · Cited by 1
Value of Information in Asia: Concepts, Current Use, and Future Directions
Dilokthornsakul, P., McQueen, R. B., Chaiyakunapruk, N., Spackman, E., Watanabe, J. H., & Campbell, J. D. (2016) · Value in Health Regional Issues · doi:10.1016/j.vhri.2015.12.003 · Cited by 1
“[17] Ramsey SD, Willke RJ, Glick H, et al.”
BackgroundHealth Economics Outcomes Research and Evidence Strategies
Ferguson, M. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-804179-6.00016-2 · Cited by 1
Wissenschaftskommunikation im Gesundheitsbereich
Serong, J., Lang, B., & Wormer, H. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-10948-6_7-1 · Cited by 1
Milte, R., Ratcliffe, J., Ada, L., English, C., Crotty, M., & Lannin, N. A. (2020) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05333-z · Cited by 1
Neyt, M., Christiaens, A., Aloi, M., de Ridder, L., Croft, N. M., Koletzko, S., Levine, A., Turner, D., Russell, R. K., Ruemmele, F. M., et al. (2020) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/13888 · Cited by 1
Park, J., Block, M., Bock, D., Kälebo, P., Nilsson, P., Prytz, M., & Haglind, E. (2021) · Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews · doi:10.2174/1573405617666210712125028 · Cited by 1
Bock, L. A., Noben, C. Y. G., van Mook, W., de Ridder, I. R., van Zwam, W. H., Schenck, H. E., Haeren, R. H. L., & Essers, B. A. B. (2022) · Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences · doi:10.23736/s0390-5616.21.05503-x · Cited by 1
Twenty-Five Years of Health Economics and Outcomes Research: An Exploration of Value in Health
Drummond, M., & Mullins, C. D. (2023) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2023.03.002 · Cited by 1
Pearce, A. M., Scarfe, J., Jones, M., Cashmore, A. W., Milat, A., Barnes, L. A. J., & Passey, M. E. (2023) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-023-09898-3 · Cited by 1
Hedges, J., Soares, G. H., Cadet‐James, Y., Dodd, Z., Cooney, S., Newman, J. S., Mittinty, M., Kularatna, S., Larkins, P., Zwolak, R., et al. (2023) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/48558 · Cited by 1
“In the broader scientific community, there is now an expectation that clinical trials evaluating medicines and procedures should additionally assess the economic value of such interventions [25].”
BackgroundCallander, E. J., Bick, D., & Mistry, H. (2023) · Birth · doi:10.1111/birt.12796 · Cited by 1
Halder, G. E., Guo, F., Harvie, H. S., White, A. B., Caldwell, L. E., Giles, D. L., Bilagi, D., & Rogers, R. G. (2024) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-023-05719-7 · Cited by 1
“We then plotted these pairs on the cost-effectiveness plane [15, 23–25].”
Holbrook, A. M., Perri, D., Levine, M., Mbuagbaw, L. C. E., Jarmain, S., Thabane, L., Tarride, J., Dolovich, L. R., Hyland, S., Telford, V., et al. (2024) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-024-01484-6 · Cited by 1
Fgaier, M., & Zrubka, Z. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems (INES) · doi:10.1109/ines63318.2024.10629086 · Cited by 1
“…most ng i n r i ng inputs to any economic review are evidence concerning the implications of e lli g n t E Clinical evaluations, such as randomized trials, are a key source of evidence [6] and are complementary with economic evaluation to achieve the goal of efficient resource allocations [7], [8].”
BackgroundWu, C., Hao, J., Yu, X., Song, R., Li, W., Zuo, L., Zhang, X., Cai, Y., Wu, H., & Hui, W. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111535 · Cited by 1
Holbert, M. D., Wood, F. M., Holland, A. J. A., Teague, W. J., Kimble, R. M., Crellin, D., Frear, C. C., Storey, K., Phillips, N. T., Singer, Y. M., et al. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0315278 · Cited by 1
Ugalde, A., Tothill, R. W., Quinn, S. J., Wong, H., Prall, O. W. J., Mitchell, C., Wickramasinghe, N. S., Fedele, C. G., Richards, N., Todio, E., et al. (2025) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-025-13506-4 · Cited by 1
Ramnarayan, P., Richards‐Belle, A., Thomas, K., Drikite, L., Sadique, Z., Zapata, S. M., Darnell, R., Au, C., Davis, P. J., Orzechowska, I., et al. (2025) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/pdbg1495 · Cited by 1
Matthée, E., Ubels, S., Klarenbeek, B. R., Verstegen, M. H. P., Hannink, G., van Workum, F., Rosman, C., Grutters, J. P. C., Henegouwen, M. I. V. B., Daams, F. D., et al. (2025) · BJS Open · doi:10.1093/bjsopen/zraf061 · Cited by 1
“In accordance with the Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research guidelines 26 , mean cost values were reported.”
Widgren, Y., Fransson, P., Erling, E., & Efverman, A. (2025) · Integrative Cancer Therapies · doi:10.1177/15347354251361464 · Cited by 1
“79 External study monitoring will be conducted according to the guideline for good clinical practice adapted to non-medical studies.”
Fuady, A., Kasempa, C., Lucas, E., Nyambe, N., Rao, D. W., Tenet, V., Broutet, N. J. N., Muwonge, R., Mwanahamuntu, M., Baussano, I., et al. (2025) · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · doi:10.2471/blt.24.292792 · Cited by 3
Humphries, B., Zytaruk, N. L., Heels‐Ansdell, D., Lau, V. I., Rochwerg, B. N., Fowler, R., Yao, Y., Cook, D. J., & Xie, F. (2025) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106841 · Cited by 1
“6 This base-case analysis will focus on the entire international cohort of 4821 REVISE patients.”
METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY OF ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS ALONGSIDE TRIALS OF KNEE PHYSIOTHERAPY
García‐Pérez, L., Linertová, R., Arvelo-Martín, A., Guerra-Marrero, C., Martínez‐Alberto, C. E., Cuellar‐Pompa, L., Escobar, A., & Serrano‐Aguilar, P. (2017) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462317000757 · Cited by 1
“There are specific guidelines with recommendations about conducting economic evaluations alongside clinical trials (28) and economic evaluations in the field of rheumatology and osteoarthritis (26;29–31).”
BackgroundMethodMuszbek, N., Proudfoot, C., Fournier, M., Chen, C.-I., Kuznik, A., Kiss, Z., Gál, P., & Michaud, K. D. (2019) · Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy · doi:10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.11.1268 · Cited by 1
Khanani, A. M., Dugel, P. U., Haller, J. A., Wagner, A. L., Lescrauwaet, B., Schmidt, R., & Bennison, C. (2020) · Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research · doi:10.2217/cer-2019-0117 · Cited by 1
Ledezma-Morales, M., Amariles, P., Salazar-Ospina, A., Duque-Zapata, N., Cárdenas, J. G., Vargas-Peláez, C. M., & Rossi, F. (2021) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research · doi:10.1093/jphsr/rmaa032 · Cited by 1
Henk, H. J., Shih, Y. T., & Borah, B. J. (2022) · JNCI Monographs · doi:10.1093/jncimonographs/lgac013 · Cited by 1
Gesundheitsökonomische Betrachtungen und Finanzierung von Prävention und Therapie
Sonntag, D., & Bock, F. D. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-59216-8_55 · Cited by 1
Rehabilitation for cancer survivors: cost-effectiveness and budget impact
Mewes, J. C. (2015) · doi:10.3990/1.9789036540285 · Cited by 1
Cost-effectiveness of Fluid Resuscitation of Critically Ill Adults
Lilly, C. M., & Touray, S. (2016) · CHEST Journal · doi:10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.011 · Cited by 1
Cost and effectiveness: Can't have one without the other
Tam, D. Y., Hughes, A., Wijeysundera, H. C., & Fremes, S. E. (2018) · Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.05.027 · Cited by 1
Backes, C. H., Notestine, R.-N. B. J. L., Lamp, R.-B. M. J. M., Balough, I. F. R. M. J. C., Notestine, A. M., Alfred, R. M. C. M., Kern, J. M., Stenger, M., Rivera, M. B. K., Moallem, M., et al. (2018) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.1.18/v1 · Cited by 1
“We will determine the statistical uncertainty in the joint distribution of costs and effects using nonparametric bootstrapping, in which we will draw 1000 samples of 220 infants, with replacement, from the study data set.(30, 31) For each of the 1000 samples, we will calculate the mean cost, mean effect, and ICER.”
MethodRombey, T., Eckhardt, H., Kiselev, J., Silzle, J., Mathes, T., & Quentin, W. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2964857/v1 · Cited by 1
COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSES OF RADIATION THERAPY TREATMENTS
Kim, H. (2015) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh)
Media frente a mediana en estudios farmacoeconómicos de tratamientos oncológicos
Ruíz, A., Gálvez, A. C. M., Soler, N. G., Sánchez, F. J., Pérez-Costillas, L., & Crespo, F. M. (2016) · PharmacoEconomics Spanish Research Articles · doi:10.1007/s40277-016-0055-9
Chu, Y.-B., Dai, L., Qi, S., Smith, M. L., Huang, H., Li, Y., & Shen, Y. (2016) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2016.00371
“…the number of enrolled patients is large or there is strong evidence showing the existence of high variability, country—or region-specific clinical evidence, e.g., event rates estimation and treatment effects in response to baseline risks and other local evidences, may be appropriate (Reed, 2012).”
BackgroundHealth Economic Assessment: Applications, Rationale, Methodology and Common Mistakes
Saunders, E. (2017) · Gaceta Mexicana de Oncología · doi:10.24875/j.gamo.17000009
Microsimulation models for cost-effectiveness analysis: a review and introduction to CEAM
Sorensen, R. J. D., Flaxman, A. D., Deason, A., Mumford, J. E., Eldrenkamp, E., Moses, M., & Weaver, M. R. (2017) · doi:10.5555/3140065.3140097
La evaluación económica en salud: aplicaciones, fundamentos, metodología y errores frecuentes
Saunders, E. (2017) · Gaceta Mexicana de Oncología · doi:10.24875/j.gamo.17000030
Kazakhstan Agency on Healthcare Technologies Assessment, A. C., Almadiyeva, A., Zhusupova, A., Semenova, Y. M., Absattarova, K. S., & Sultanov, M. J. (2018) · Journal Medicine · doi:10.31082/1728-452x-2018-197-11-61-70
Methodological challenges to evaluating the health economic impact of nutritional interventions
Schmier, J. K., & Chang, E. T. (2019) · World Nutrition · doi:10.26596/wn.201910138-53
Ramponi, F. (2019) · White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Vekov, T. Y., Gavrilova, A., Veleva, N., & Kolev, J. (2019) · Annual for Hospital Pharmacy · doi:10.14748/ahp.v5i1.5952
“Следователно общоприетият методологичен подход е резултатите от икономическия анализ да бъдат представени като инкрементално съотношение (ICER) на допълнителни разходи (Δ costs) и допълнителни здравни ползи (Δ QALY) на алтернативните здравни технологии за профилактика и лечение на възрастни CMV-серопозитивни пациенти…”
The clinical utility of molecular diagnostics in breast cancer management
Berghuis, A. M. S. (2019) · doi:10.3990/1.9789036549066
Ribeiro, I., Marques, F. B., Alves, D., & Alves, C. (2020) · Acta Ophthalmologica · doi:10.1111/aos.14362
“Additionally, it can be applied to both trialbased and model-based economic evaluation studies and it is the checklist recommended by the Campbell & Cochrane Economics Methods Group (Wijnen et al. 2016; Ribeiro et al. 2019).”
MethodEconomic Evaluation of Pharmaceuticals
Ademi, Z., Marquina, C., & Liew, D. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-26472-6.00159-5
Cochrane, M. (2020) · Liverpool John Moores University · doi:10.24377/ljmu.t.00013547
“In addition, it is recommended that you consult your country’s guidelines to identify when there is a preferred valuation approach (ISPOR, 2019).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTrang, S. (2016) · TSpace (University of Toronto)
Opt-Out Model of HIV Screening- A Study in Federal Capital Territory Abuja, Nigeria
Ibekwe, E. (2026) · e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) · doi:10.83056/mmu.32477667
Dumb and Dumberer When Harry Met Lloyd (Film)
Olsen, M. (2003) · Sight & sound/Sight and sound
Mao, H., Li, X., Lin, X., Zhou, L., Zhang, X., Cao, Y., Jiang, Y., Chen, H., Fang, X., & Gu, L. (2021) · Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews · doi:10.2174/1573405617666210218092751
Штрімайтіс, О. В., & Dobrova, V. Y. (2021) · Management economy and quality assurance in pharmacy · doi:10.24959/uekj.21.8
ECONOMIC FACTORS OF CLINICAL TRIALS OF MEDICINES IN SMALL POPULATION COUNTRIES: CASE STUDY OF LATVIA
Pētersone, M., Krievins, D. K., Ketners, K., & Rakauskienė, O. G. (2021) · SOCIETY INTEGRATION EDUCATION Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference · doi:10.17770/sie2021vol4.6143
“…Sakamaki et al., 2020; Thiers, Sinskey, & Berndt, 2008), including in Latvia (Logviss, Krievins, & Purvina, 2018), but various economic aspects of clinical trials are subject to continuous changes (Kramer, J. M.;Schulman, 2012; Petitti, 2009; Pinto, Willan, & O’Brien, 2005; Ramsey et al., 2015).”
BackgroundWhat Helps Us Decide to Adopt an Intervention: Efficacy, Costs, or Both?
Yieh, L., & Dukhovny, D. (2021) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2021-051016
Saving money, saving lives: Health economics as a guide to cost-effective decision making
Ubels, J. (2021) · International Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.06.053
Gezondheidseconomische evaluaties binnen een preventief beleid: een kritische introductie
Werbrouck, A., Annemans, L., Verhaeghe, N., & Simoens, S. (2021) · Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde · doi:10.47671/tvg.77.21.117
Economic Evaluation of the SOS Training to Reduce Victimization in Dual Diagnosis Patients
de Waal, M. M., Blankers, M., Lommerse, N. M., Kikkert, M., Dekker, J., & Goudriaan, A. E. (2021) · Journal of Dual Diagnosis · doi:10.1080/15504263.2021.1965409
“…Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (Drummond et al., 2015), taking into account the CHEERS statement (Husereau et al., 2013) and the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) guidelines on economic evaluations alongside clinical trials (Ramsey et al., 2015).”
Torreglosa, C. R., Sarti, F. M., Ferreira, Â. C. B., Weber, B., Santos, R. H. N., Silvestrini, M. M., & Filho, A. D. P. C. (2020) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-27302/v1
“The guidelines for economic evaluations of clinical trials recommend considering intention-to-treat analyses (datasets from the original trial) to perform cost-effectiveness analysis(32).”
BackgroundCollection of economic data using UB-04s: Is it worth the effort? Evidence from two clinical trials
Higuera, L., Ismyrloglou, E., Lu, X., Hinnenthal, J. A., & Holbrook, R. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0277685
Sweeney, S., & Singh, M. P. (2022) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(22)00519-8
Economic Evaluation Methods and Approaches
Janković, D., & Faria, R. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50247-8_65-1
Le statut actuel de la thérapie EMDR, les domaines cibles spécifiques et les objectifs pour l’avenir
Matthijssen, S. J. M. A., Lee, C. W., de Roos, C., Barron, I. G., Jarero, I., Shapiro, E., Hurley, E. C., Schubert, S. J., Baptist, J. A., Amann, B. L., et al. (2023) · Journal of EMDR Practice and Research · doi:10.1891/emdr-2023-0012
Harper, D. M., Anderson, R. J., Baker, E., & Yu, T. M. (2023) · doi:10.1158/1940-6207.c.6709342.v1
Harper, D. M., Anderson, R. J., Baker, E., & Yu, T. M. (2023) · doi:10.1158/1940-6207.c.6709342
Weber, S. A., Pietzsch, M., Bestard, O., Grinyo, J. M., Viklický, O., & Reinke, P. (2016) · Advances in Precision Medicine · doi:10.18063/apm.v1i1.16
Franklin, M. K., Porter, A., de Vocht, F., Kearns, B., Latimer, N. R., Alava, M. H., Young, T. A., & Kidger, J. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3317541/v1
Pirhonen, L., McAuliffe, F. M., Maindal, H. T., O'Reilly, S. L., Davies, A. K., Burden, C., Skinner, T. C., Vrangbæk, K., & Callander, E. J. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3302819/v1
Berghuis, A. M. S., Koffijberg, H., Pouwels, X., Berger, F., Alix‐Panabières, C., Jacot, W., Pierga, J., Bidard, F., & IJzerman, M. J. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.10.09.23296711
“The analysis of cost-effectiveness is critical to support translation and reimbursement of new technologies deemed effective and empirical cost-effectiveness analysis based on data collected alongside a clinical trial are strongly recommended (21).”
BackgroundAbrahams‐Gessel, S., Beratarrechea, A. G., Irazola, V. E., Gulayin, P., Gutiérrez, L., Mahoney, M., & Gaziano, T. A. (2023) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2023.107357
Economic Evaluation of Mental Health Interventions
Jin, H., Jalali, A., Wijnen, B. F. M., & Bao, Y. (2023) · Frontiers research topics · doi:10.3389/978-2-8325-3692-6
Veríssimo, J. L. (2023) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/d.5.2023.tde-22112023-154616
Telemonitoring in Heart Failure Patient Management
Silva, P., Gomes, P. V., Condeço, J., Curado, H., & Veloso, R. (2023) · Advances in medical technologies and clinical practice book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-9251-2.ch011
de Jonge, M., Blankers, M., Bockting, C., van Dijk, M. K., Kikkert, M., & Dekker, J. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1134071
Stent-screw-assisted internal fixation (SAIF)
Cianfoni, A. (2023) · doi:10.26481/dis.20231220ac
The acute lumbosacral radicular syndrome
ter Meulen, B. C. (2024) · doi:10.5463/thesis.591
Randomized Controlled Trials in Restorative Dentistry and Prosthodontics
Kawai, Y., de Souza, R. F., & Feine, J. S. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-47651-8_10
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramsey, S. D., Willke, R. J., Glick, H., Reed, S. D., Augustovski, F., Jonsson, B., Briggs, A., & Sullivan, S. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Pfizer (United States) (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR)
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Ramsey, Scott D.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Value in Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-172
- ISSN
- 1098-3015 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2139814250
- Cited by
- 811
- References
- 184
- Citations by year
- 2026: 58 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 103 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 6
- FWCI
- 17.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Value in Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
- Keywords
- cost-effectiveness analysis, clinical trials, economic evaluation, trial design, health care utilization, health utility, intention-to-treat analysis, subgroup analysis, uncertainty characterization, reporting guidelines, reimbursement decisions, healthcare resource allocation
- MeSH terms
- Cost-Benefit Analysis, Health Policy, Health Services Research, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Advisory Committees, Research Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review