Cited by 5Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchReproductive tract infections researchWomen's cancer prevention and management

Concordance of Anyplex™ II HPV HR assays with reference HPV assays in cervical cancer screening: Systematic review

Biazin, Habtamu·2022·Journal of Virological Methods

Abstract

Introduction Genital infection with certain types of human papillomaviruses (HPVs) is a major cause of premalignant dysplasia and cervical cancer globally. Identification of 14 high-risk human papillomaviruses (HR-HPV) is immensely important in elucidating molecular epidemiology, patient monitoring, and evidence-based treatment. HPVs testing has become an essential part of current clinical practice in the management of cervical cancer and precancerous lesions. Thus, HPV assays are increasingly used for primary cervical screening and HPV genotyping, for monitoring vaccination-effect and determining changes in the epidemiology of viral genotypes across the globe. Testing for high-risk HPV is more effective in primary cervical cancer screening than in the cytological examination of a Pap smear. Separate genotyping may be useful for triage in both HPV-based and cytology-based screening. It should be used only for clinically validated tests. Aims To evaluate the concordance of Anyplex™ II HPV HR with other HPV assays in cervical cancer screening. Methods Validation studies of Anyplex™ II HPV HR assay from PubMed, google scholar, google database and Scopus were used to search articles. Articles published in English from 2013 onwards were systematically searched using keywords. Besides, other databases like Google Scholar and the Google database were searched manually for grey literature. The last search was done in December 2020. Then study eligibility, extracted data, and assessed…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114435

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Biazin, H.
Affiliations
Addis Ababa University (ET)
Corresponding author
Biazin, Habtamu
Venue
Journal of Virological Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-03
Volume
301
Pages
114435
ISSN
0166-0934 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200523197
Cited by
5
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Virological Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
high-risk HPV genotyping, cervical cancer screening, CIN2+ detection, CIN3+ detection, sensitivity and specificity, HPV genotyping, risk of bias assessment, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
MeSH terms
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections, Early Detection of Cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review