Cited by 36Land Rights and ReformsAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentAgricultural Innovations and Practices

Land use decisions: by whom and to whose benefit? A serious game to uncover dynamics in farm land allocation at household level in Northern Ghana

Open access
Michalscheck, Mirja, Groot, Jeroen C.J., Fischer, Gundula, Tittonell, Pablo·2020·Land Use Policy

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104325

Cites

122 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Through agroecological approaches, women can develop higher levels of autonomy by building knowledge, through collective action, creating opportunities for commercialization, and enhancing negotiation and leadership skills.

    “Through agroecological approaches, women can develop higher levels of autonomy by building knowledge, through collective action and creating opportunities for commercialization, and enhancing their negotiation and leadership skills (Oliver, 2016;Kerr et al., 2019b;Michalscheck et al., 2020).”

    From Assessing Transitions to Sustainable Agricultural and Food Systems: A Tool for Agroecology Performance Evaluation (TAPE) (2020) · cites this paper as Michalscheck et al., 2020

    The Discussion (page not provided) says that knowledge and agricultural training may strengthen women's role in household land-use decisions, and that wives may benefit disproportionately from capacity building. It does not connect that empowerment specifically to agroecological approaches, collective action, commercialization opportunities, or improved leadership skills. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. FAO, 2006. Improving Tenure Security For The Ghana -Country Case Study (No. LEP Working Paper # 2), Workshop for Sub-Saharan Africa. Rome, Italy.
  2. Hames, D.S., 2012. Integrative Negotiation A Strategy for Creating Value, in: Negotiation: Closing Deals, Settling Disputes, and Making Team Decisions. SAGE Publications Inc, pp. 83-116.
  3. Iversen, V., Jackson, C., Kebede, B., Munro, A., Verschhor, A., 2006. What's Love Got to Do With It? An Experimental Test of Household Models in East Uganda., Working Paper Series. Oxford, UK.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Michalscheck, M., Groot, J. C. J., Fischer, G., & Tittonell, P.
Affiliations
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (TZ)
  • Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR)
Corresponding author
Michalscheck, Mirja
Venue
Land Use Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
91
Pages
104325
ISSN
0264-8377 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2994645587
Cited by
36
References
121
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Land Use Policy (acceptedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Agritrop (Cirad) (submittedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
United States Agency for International Development
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Keywords
intra-household decision-making, land allocation, smallholder farming, serious games, negotiation, power relations, gender roles, household heads, rainfed agriculture, Northern Ghana, social-ecological systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review