Cited by 236Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentOil Palm Production and Sustainability

Solving Brazil’s land use puzzle: Increasing production and slowing Amazon deforestation

Open access
Stabile, Marcelo C.C., Guimarães, André L., Silva, Daniel S., Ribeiro, Vivian, Macedo, Marcia N., Coe, Michael T., Pinto, Erika, Moutinho, Paulo +1 more·2020·Land Use Policy

Abstract

Brazil has become an agricultural powerhouse, producing roughly 30 % of the world’s soy and 15 % of its beef by 2013 – yet historically much of that growth has come at the expense of its native ecosystems. Since 1985, pastures and croplands have replaced nearly 65 Mha of forests and savannas in the legal Amazon. A growing body of work suggests that this paradigm of horizontal expansion of agriculture over ecosystems is outdated and brings negative social and environmental outcomes. Here we propose four strategies that can reduce deforestation, while increasing production and social wellbeing. First, eliminate land grabbing and land speculation through designation of public forests. This would clarify land tenure and limit the pool of land available for uncontrolled expansion of agriculture and ranching. Second, reduce deforestation on private properties by implementing existing mechanisms in Brazil’s Forest Code to facilitate payments for environmental services, with support from market initiatives for sustainable sourcing of agricultural products. Third, incentivize increased productivity on medium and large properties through targeted investments. By stimulating adoption of proven technologies for sustainable intensification, this would help meet Brazil’s production targets and growing international demand for agricultural products, without expanding into new production areas. Finally, foster economic, environmental and social improvements through technical assistance to small farmers. Small farmers occupy a large swath of the Amazon and often lack access to technical assistance, production technology, and markets. Providing quality technical assistance to small farmers could help them better align production practices with local opportunities; increase household income and improve livelihoods; and reduce deforestation pressure. By implementing these four strategies in a coordinated effort between public and private agents, Brazil can show the world how to reduce deforestation while increasing agricultural output, reestablishing its leadership in managing natural resources and mitigating climate change.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104362

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cattle have been particularly instrumental to Amazon colonization and deforestation because of the region's limited infrastructure, poor accessibility, and fuzzy land tenure configuration.

    “Cattle have been particularly instrumental to Amazon colonization and deforestationbecause of the region's limited infrastructure, poor accessibility, and fuzzy land tenure configuration (Stabile et al., 2020;Russo Lopes and Bastos Lima, 2022).”

    From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Stabile et al., 2020

    The Introduction links Amazon agricultural expansion, including pasture and a growing cattle herd, to deforestation. In its discussion of public forests, the paper says unclear land tenure enables land grabbing and deforestation. It does not say cattle were particularly instrumental to colonization because of limited infrastructure or poor accessibility; its infrastructure discussion concerns small family farms instead. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Alix-Garcia, J., Rausch, L.L., L'Roe, J., Gibbs, H.K., Munger, J., 2017. Avoided defor- estation linked to environmental registration of properties in the brazilian amazon: environmental registration in the Amazon. Conserv. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1111/ conl.12414. · DOI
  2. Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Sunderlin, W.D., Verchot, L.V. (Eds.), 2012. Analysing REDD +: Challenges and Choices. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
  3. Azevedo, A.A., Stabile, M.C.C., Reis, T.N.P., 2015. Commodity production in Brazil: combining zero deforestation and zero illegality. Elem. Sci. Anthr. 3, 000076. https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000076. · DOI
  4. Azevedo-Ramos, C., Moutinho, P., 2018. No man's land in the Brazilian Amazon: could undesignated public forests slow Amazon deforestation? Land Use Policy 73, 125-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.005. · DOI
  5. Börner, J., Baylis, K., Corbera, E., Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Honey-Rosés, J., Persson, U.M., Wunder, S., 2017. The effectiveness of payments for environmental services. World Dev. 96, 359-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.020. · DOI
  6. Boucher, D., Roquemore, S., Fitzhugh, E., 2013. Brazil's success in reducing deforestation. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 6, 426-445. https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291300600308. · DOI
  7. Brown, D.S., Brown, J.C., Brown, C., 2016. Land occupations and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy 54, 331-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. landusepol.2016.02.003. · DOI
  8. Butt, N., de Oliveira, P.A., Costa, M.H., 2011. Evidence that deforestation affects the onset of the rainy season in Rondonia. Brazil. J. Geophys. Res. 116, D11120. https://doi. org/10.1029/2010JD015174. · DOI
  9. Caldart, R.S., Pereira, I.B., Alentejano, P., Frigotto, G. (Eds.), 2012. Dicionário da educação do campo. Escola Politécnica de Saúde Joaquim Venâncio/Fiocruz ; Expressão Popular, Rio de Janeiro : São Paulo.
  10. Chaddad, F., 2015. The Economics and Organization of Brazilian Agriculture: Recent Evolution and Productivity Gains. Elsevier Science.
  11. Chambers, J.Q., Artaxo, P., 2017. Deforestation size influences rainfall. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 175-176. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3238. · DOI
  12. Cohn, A.S., Mosnier, A., Havlík, P., Valin, H., Herrero, M., Schmid, E., O'Hare, M., Obersteiner, M., 2014. Cattle ranching intensification in Brazil can reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by sparing land from deforestation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1307163111. · DOI
  13. Dantas, A.T., Kozioł, W., Siuda-Ambroziak, R. (Eds.), 2017. Brazil -Poland Focus on Environment. University of Warsaw : Rio de Janerio State University, Warsaw; Rio de Janeiro.
  14. dos Santos, C.C., Souza de Lima Ferraz Junior, A., Oliveira Sá, S., Andrés Muñoz Gutiérrez, J., Braun, H., Sarrazin, M., Brossard, M., Desjardins, T., 2018. Soil carbon stock and Plinthosol fertility in smallholder land-use systems in the eastern Amazon. Brazil. Carbon Manag. 9, 655-664. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018. 1530026. · DOI
  15. Garcia, E., Ramos Filho, F., Mallmann, G., Fonseca, F., 2017. Costs, benefits and chal- lenges of sustainable livestock intensification in a major deforestation frontier in the brazilian amazon. Sustainability 9, 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010158. · DOI
  16. Gibbs, H.K., Rausch, L., Munger, J., Schelly, I., Morton, D.C., Noojipady, P., Soares-Filho, B., Barreto, P., Micol, L., Walker, N.F., 2015. Brazil's soy moratorium. Science 347, 377-378. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa0181. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Golden Kroner, R.E., Qin, S., Cook, C.N., Krithivasan, R., Pack, S.M., Bonilla, O.D., Cort- Kansinally, K.A., Coutinho, B., Feng, M., Martínez Garcia, M.I., He, Y., Kennedy, C.J., Lebreton, C., Ledezma, J.C., Lovejoy, T.E., Luther, D.A., Parmanand, Y., Ruíz- Agudelo, C.A., Yerena, E., Morón Zambrano, V., Mascia, M.B., 2019. The uncertain future of protected lands and waters. Science 364, 881-886. https://doi.org/10. 1126/science.aau5525. IBGE, 2019. Pesquisa Trimestral do Abate de Animais -Tabela 1086 -Número de in- formantes e Quantidade de leite cru, resfriado ou não, adquirido e industrializado, no mês e no trimestre, por tipo de inspeção (No. Tabela 1086). IBGE. IBGE, 2018a. Produção Agrícola Municipal -Tabela 1612 -Área plantada, área colhida, quantidade produzida e valor da produção da lavoura temporária (No. Tabela 1612). IBGE. IBGE, 2018b. Pesquisa Pecuária Municipal -Tabela 73 -Efetivo dos rebanhos por tipo de rebanho (No. Tabela 73). IBGE. · DOI
  18. IPAM, 2014. Stimulating the Demand for REDD+ Emission Reductions in Brazil: the Need for a Strategic Intervention Pre 2020: a Case Study for the Interim Forest Finance Project. Global canopy Programme, Oxford, UK.
  19. Kastens, J.H., Brown, J.C., Coutinho, A.C., Bishop, C.R., Esquerdo, J.C.D.M., 2017. Soy moratorium impacts on soybean and deforestation dynamics in Mato Grosso, Brazil. PLOS ONE 12, e0176168. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176168. · DOI
  20. Koch, N., zu Ermgassen, E.K.H.J., Wehkamp, J., Oliveira Filho, F.J.B., Schwerhoff, G., 2019. Agricultural productivity and forest conservation: evidence from the brazilian amazon. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 101, 919-940. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aay110. · DOI
  21. Lambin, E.F., Gibbs, H.K., Heilmayr, R., Carlson, K.M., Fleck, L.C., Garrett, R.D., le Polain de Waroux, Y., McDermott, C.L., McLaughlin, D., Newton, P., Nolte, C., Pacheco, P., Rausch, L.L., Streck, C., Thorlakson, T., Walker, N.F., 2018. The role of supply-chain initiatives in reducing deforestation. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 109-116. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41558-017-0061-1. · DOI
  22. Leite-Filho, A.T., Sousa Pontes, V.Y., Costa, M.H., 2019. Effects of deforestation on the onset of the rainy season and the duration of dry spells in Southern Amazonia. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 124, 5268-5281. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029537. · DOI
  23. Macedo, M.N., DeFries, R.S., Morton, D.C., Stickler, C.M., Galford, G.L., Shimabukuro, Y.E., 2012. Decoupling of deforestation and soy production in the southern Amazon during the late 2000s. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 1341-1346. https://doi.org/10. 1073/pnas.1111374109. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Mahmood, R., Pielke, R.A., Hubbard, K.G., Niyogi, D., Dirmeyer, P.A., McAlpine, C., Carleton, A.M., Hale, R., Gameda, S., Beltrán-Przekurat, A., Baker, B., McNider, R., Legates, D.R., Shepherd, M., Du, J., Blanken, P.D., Frauenfeld, O.W., Nair, U.S., Fall, S., 2014. Land cover changes and their biogeophysical effects on climate: land cover changes and their biogeophysical effects on climate. Int. J. Climatol. 34, 929-953. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3736. · DOI
  25. Martha, G.B., Alves, E., Contini, E., 2012. Land-saving approaches and beef production growth in Brazil. Agric. Syst. 110, 173-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.03. 001. · DOI
  26. Mato Grosso, 2016. Decreto 468, de 31 de março de 2016 (Dispõe sobre a instituição do Comitê Estadual da Estratégia: Produzir, Conservar e Incluir -PCI, apresentada pelo Estado de Mato Grosso na COP 21, e dá outras providências.). MDIC, Brasil, 2018. Statistics of International Trade in the Last 200 Years. pp. 1971-1980.
  27. Moutinho, P., Guerra, R., Azevedo-Ramos, C., 2016. Achieving zero deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: what is missing? Elem. Sci. Anthr. 4, 000125. https://doi.org/10. 12952/journal.elementa.000125. · DOI
  28. Nepstad, D., McGrath, D., Stickler, C., Alencar, A., Azevedo, A., Swette, B., Bezerra, T., DiGiano, M., Shimada, J., Seroa da Motta, R., Armijo, E., Castello, L., Brando, P., Hansen, M., McGrath-Horn, M., Carvalho, O., Hess, L., 2014. Slowing Amazon de- forestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains. Science 344, 1118-1123. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248525. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Nepstad, D.C., Verssimo, A., Alencar, A., Nobre, C., Lima, E., Lefebvre, P., Schlesinger, P., Potter, C., Moutinho, P., Mendoza, E., Cochrane, M., Brooks, V., 1999. Large-scale impoverishment of Amazonian forests by logging and fire. Nature 398, 505-508. https://doi.org/10.1038/19066. · DOI
  30. Pinto, L.F., Sparovek, G., Bento, J., Faria, V., 2017. Qual o impacto do desmatamento zero no Brasil? Instituto Escolhas, São Paulo, Brasil. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2. 15934.79684. · DOI
  31. Richards, P., Pellegrina, H., VanWey, L., Spera, S., 2015. Soybean development: the im- pact of a decade of agricultural change on urban and economic growth in Mato Grosso, Brazil. PloS One 10, e0122510. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0122510. · DOI
  32. da Silva, J.M.C., da Castro Dias, T.C.A., da Cunha, A.C., Cunha, H.F.A., 2019. Public spending in federal protected areas in Brazil. Land Use Policy 86, 158-164. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.035. · DOI
  33. Silvério, D.V., Brando, P.M., Macedo, M.N., Beck, P.S.A., Bustamante, M., Coe, M.T., 2015. Agricultural expansion dominates climate changes in southeastern Amazonia: the overlooked non-GHG forcing. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 104015. https://doi.org/10. 1088/1748-9326/10/10/104015. · DOI
  34. Snyder, P.K., 2010. The influence of tropical deforestation on the Northern Hemisphere Climate by atmospheric teleconnections. Earth Interact. 14, 1-34. https://doi.org/10. 1175/2010EI280. · DOI
  35. Soares-Filho, B., Rajão, R., Merry, F., Rodrigues, H., Davis, J., Lima, L., Macedo, M., Coe, M., Carneiro, A., Santiago, L., 2016. Brazil's market for trading forest certificates. PLoS One 11, e0152311. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152311. · DOI
  36. Sparovek, G., Reydon, B.P., Guedes Pinto, L.F., Faria, V., de Freitas, F.L.M., Azevedo- Ramos, C., Gardner, T., Hamamura, C., Rajão, R., Cerignoni, F., Siqueira, G.P., Carvalho, T., Alencar, A., Ribeiro, V., 2019. Who owns Brazilian lands? Land Use Policy 87, 104062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104062. · DOI
  37. Spracklen, D.V., Baker, J.C.A., Garcia-Carreras, L., Marsham, J.H., 2018. The effects of tropical vegetation on rainfall. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 43, 193-218. https://doi. org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-030136. · DOI
  38. Strassburg, B.B.N., Latawiec, A.E., Barioni, L.G., Nobre, C.A., da Silva, V.P., Valentim, J.F., Vianna, M., Assad, E.D., 2014. When enough should be enough: improving the use of current agricultural lands could meet production demands and spare natural habitats in Brazil. Glob. Environ. Change 28, 84-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. gloenvcha.2014.06.001. · DOI
  39. Tollefson, J., 2018. Brazil's lawmakers renew push to weaken environmental rules. Nature 557https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05022-2. 17-17. · DOI
  40. Venâncio, M.D., Pope, K., Sieber, S., 2018. Brazil's new government threatens food se- curity and biodiversity. Nature 564https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-07611-7. 39-39. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stabile, M. C. C., Guimarães, A. L., Silva, D. S., Ribeiro, V., Macedo, M. N., Coe, M. T., Pinto, E., Moutinho, P., & Alencar, A.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm Environment Institute (SE)
  • Woodwell Climate Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Stabile, Marcelo C.C.
Venue
Land Use Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
91
Pages
104362
ISSN
0264-8377 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2990833080
Cited by
236
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 20 · 2016: 1
FWCI
15.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Land Use Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Oil Palm Production and Sustainability
Keywords
Amazon deforestation, agricultural expansion, land grabbing, land speculation, land tenure, Forest Code, payments for environmental services, sustainable sourcing, sustainable intensification, smallholder farmers, technical assistance, soybean production, beef production, social well-being, climate change mitigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review