Cited by 77Gender Studies in LanguageLinguistic Variation and MorphologyLinguistic and Sociocultural Studies

The influence of linguistic and social attitudes on grammaticality judgments of singular ‘they’

Open access
Bradley, Evan D.·2020·Language Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101272

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gender-inclusive language reforms, including gender-inclusive pronouns, often face public resistance.

    “Gender-inclusive language reforms, including gender-inclusive pronouns, often face public resistance (Blaubergs, 1980; Bradley, 2020; Bradley et al., 2019; Hekanaho, 2020; Parks & Roberton, 1998; Vergoossen et al., 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bradley, E. D.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Bradley, Evan D.
Venue
Language Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
78
Pages
101272
ISSN
0388-0001 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3003764105
Cited by
75
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2
FWCI
11.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2023-11-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Language Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarSphere (Penn State Libraries) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
Keywords
singular they, gender-neutral language, grammaticality judgment, linguistic prescriptivism, sexism, hostile sexism, benevolent sexism, gender ideology, third-person singular pronouns, language attitudes, language reform, American English

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review