The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Warning for excessive positivity: Authentic leadership and other traps in leadership studies
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Both critiques point out that the conceptualisation and operationalisation of these prominent leadership styles confound the variable with its effects.”
From A meta-analysis of the role of trust in the leadership- performance relationship (2021) · cites this paper as Alvesson & Einola, 2019
Citations
Cites
Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership
Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001 · Cited by 5,478
Authentic Leadership: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Measure†
Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206307308913 · Cited by 3,471
Meta-Analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues.
Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827 · Cited by 3,005
Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior
Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(99)00016-8 · Cited by 2,528
On making causal claims: A review and recommendations
Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2010) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010 · Cited by 2,441
Trilling, L. (1972) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674044463 · Cited by 2,079
An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories
Yukl, G. (1999) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(99)00013-2 · Cited by 2,058
TARGET ARTICLE: Toward a Conceptualization of Optimal Self-Esteem
Kernis, M. H. (2003) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1401_01 · Cited by 1,683 · cited 1×
““Self” is a philosophical or psychological concept (see also Kernis, 2003) whereas “role” is a response to external expectations.”
BackgroundPersonality at the crossroads : current issues in interactional psychology
Magnusson, D., & Endler, N. S. (1977) · Lawrence Erlbaum Associates eBooks · Cited by 1,460
Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda
Gardner, W. L., Cogliser, C. C., Davis, K. M., & Dickens, M. P. (2011) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.007 · Cited by 1,340
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Sashkin, 2004, Transformational leadership: A review and synthesis, 171
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Leadership, creativity and innovation: a meta-analytic review
Lee, A., Legood, A., Hughes, D., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Knight, C. (2020) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2019.1661837 · Cited by 425
Alvesson, M. G., & Sandberg, J. (2020) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12582 · Cited by 337
“According to a growing number of commentators, many, if not most, subareas of leadership studies suffer from questionable assumptions, design and theoretical reasoning (e.g. Alvesson and Einola, 2019; Hunter, Bedell-Avers and Mumford, 2007; Fischer, 2018).”
Self-citationLeadership Styles: A Comprehensive Assessment and Way Forward
Fischer, T., & Sitkin, S. B. (2023) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2020.0340 · Cited by 303
Ethical leadership: Mapping the terrain for concept cleanup and a future research agenda
Banks, G. C., Fischer, T., Gooty, J., & Stock, G. (2021) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101471 · Cited by 260
Meanings of Theory: Clarifying Theory through Typification
Sandberg, J., & Alvesson, M. (2020) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12587 · Cited by 214
“…mirroring of reality, but has in significant ways also been determined through researchers’ choice and specification of constructs, such as self-awareness, relational transparency, balanced processing and internalized moral perspective (Alvesson and Einola, 2019; Nyberg and Sveningsson, 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Alvesson, M., & Einola, K.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Hanken School of Economics (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Alvesson, Mats
- Venue
- The Leadership Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 383-395
- ISSN
- 1048-9843 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2940826307
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 57 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 10
- FWCI
- 67.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- The Leadership Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Leadership
- Keywords
- authentic leadership, positive leadership, tautology, measurement instruments, transformational leadership, servant leadership, ethical leadership, spiritual leadership, corporate life
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
