The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Careless responding in questionnaire measures: Detection, impact, and remedies
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Participation from the comfort of one's own home could have contributed to careless responding (Goldammer et al., 2020) and suboptimal effort (DeRight & Jorgensen, 2015).”
From Mindfulness Effects on Anxiety: Disentangling the Role of Decentering and Treatment Expectations (2024) · cites this paper as Goldammer et al., 2020
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
DeLong, E. R., DeLong, D. M., & Clarke-Pearson, D. L. (1988) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531595 · Cited by 22,649
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990) · Journal of Occupational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x · Cited by 11,917
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5 · Cited by 7,299
(2010) · Cited by 7,034
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7 · Cited by 5,628
Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome.
Currall, S. C., & Organ, D. W. (1988) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393071 · Cited by 5,594
Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85 · Cited by 4,774
Identifying careless responses in survey data.
Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0028085 · Cited by 3,865
Sufficient Sample Sizes for Multilevel Modeling
Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2005) · Methodology · doi:10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86 · Cited by 3,582
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Weesie, 1999, Seemingly unrelated estimation and the cluster-adjusted sandwich estimator, Stata Technical Bulletin, 52, 34
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ward, M. K., & Meade, A. W. (2023) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-040422-045007 · Cited by 512
What makes for future entrepreneurs? The role of digital competencies for entrepreneurial intention
Bachmann, N., Rose, R., Maul, V., & Hölzle, K. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114481 · Cited by 224
Jaeger, S. R., & Cardello, A. V. (2022) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104676 · Cited by 113
Hillebrandt, A., & Barclay, L. J. (2022) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2612 · Cited by 94
The Lazy or Dishonest Respondent: Detection and Prevention
Arthur, W., Hagen, E., & George, F. (2020) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-055324 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldammer, P., Annen, H., Stöckli, P. L., & Jonas, K.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Goldammer, Philippe
- Venue
- The Leadership Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 101384
- ISSN
- 1048-9843 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3003804331
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 12.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Leadership Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Keywords
- careless responding, response sets, questionnaire validity, reaction time (psychology), Mahalanobis distance, residual variance, survey data quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
