The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Careless responding in questionnaire measures: Detection, impact, and remedies
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Participation from the comfort of one's own home could have contributed to careless responding (Goldammer et al., 2020) and suboptimal effort (DeRight & Jorgensen, 2015).”
From Mindfulness Effects on Anxiety: Disentangling the Role of Decentering and Treatment Expectations (2024) · cites this paper as Goldammer et al., 2020
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
DeLong, E. R., DeLong, D. M., & Clarke-Pearson, D. L. (1988) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531595 · Cited by 22,649
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990) · Journal of Occupational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x · Cited by 11,917
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5 · Cited by 7,299
(2010) · Cited by 7,034
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7 · Cited by 5,628
Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome.
Currall, S. C., & Organ, D. W. (1988) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393071 · Cited by 5,594
Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85 · Cited by 4,774
Identifying careless responses in survey data.
Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0028085 · Cited by 3,865
Sufficient Sample Sizes for Multilevel Modeling
Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2005) · Methodology · doi:10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86 · Cited by 3,582
Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers.
Schwarz, N. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.2.93 · Cited by 2,846
Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome
Bies, R. J., & Organ, D. W. (1989) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258426 · Cited by 2,605
Multidimensionafity of Leader-Member Exchange: An Empirical Assessment through Scale Development
Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063(99)80053-1 · Cited by 2,050
Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory
Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2012) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0026802 · Cited by 1,562
Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data
Curran, P. G. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.006 · Cited by 1,356
Effects of Questionnaire Length on Participation and Indicators of Response Quality in a Web Survey
Galešić, M., & Bošnjak, M. (2009) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfp031 · Cited by 1,324
Detecting and Deterring Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveys
Huang, J. L. W., Curran, P. G., Keeney, J., Poposki, E. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2011) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-011-9231-8 · Cited by 1,315
van Knippenberg, D., & Sitkin, S. B. (2013) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2013.759433 · Cited by 1,302
Caring about carelessness: Participant inattention and its effects on research
Maniaci, M. R., & Rogge, R. D. (2014) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.008 · Cited by 852
The use of receiver operating characteristic curves in biomedical informatics
Lasko, T. A., Bhagwat, J. G., Zou, K. H., & Lucila Ohno-machado, A. (2005) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2005.02.008 · Cited by 821
The Effect of Small Sample Size on Two-Level Model Estimates: A Review and Illustration
McNeish, D., & Stapleton, L. M. (2014) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9287-x · Cited by 726
Best practice recommendations for data screening
DeSimone, J. A., Harms, P. D., & DeSimone, A. J. (2014) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1962 · Cited by 690
Ascertaining the validity of individual protocols from Web-based personality inventories
Johnson, J. A. (2004) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2004.09.009 · Cited by 618
What's under the ROC? An Introduction to Receiver Operating Characteristics Curves
Streiner, D. L., & Cairney, J. (2007) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674370705200210 · Cited by 530
Antonakis, J., & House, R. J. (2014) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.04.005 · Cited by 440
Williams, L. J., & McGonagle, A. K. (2015) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-015-9422-9 · Cited by 427
Insufficient effort responding: Examining an insidious confound in survey data.
Huang, J. L. W., Liu, M., & Bowling, N. A. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038510 · Cited by 421
Charisma: An ill-defined and ill-measured gift
Antonakis, J., Bastardoz, N., Jacquart, P., & Shamir, B. (2016) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062305 · Cited by 410
Careless Responding to Reverse-Worded Items: Implications for Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Woods, C. M. (2006) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-005-9004-7 · Cited by 402
Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment.
McGrath, R. E., Mitchell, M., Kim, B. H., & Hough, L. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0019216 · Cited by 282
Construct redundancy in leader behaviors: A review and agenda for the future
Banks, G. C., Gooty, J., Ross, R. L., Williams, C. E., & Harrington, N. T. (2018) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.005 · Cited by 275 · cited 2×
“Alternative measures could be questionnaires with items that more clearly map on well-defined constructs (Antonakis et al., 2016; Banks et al., 2018) or, even better, objective measures such as video materials, transcripts of speeches, and other archival sources (Antonakis et al., 2016).”
BackgroundDirty Data: The Effects of Screening Respondents Who Provide Low-Quality Data in Survey Research
DeSimone, J. A., & Harms, P. D. (2017) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-017-9514-9 · Cited by 269
Felfe, J. (2006) · Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O · doi:10.1026/0932-4089.50.2.61 · Cited by 235
Justifying Aggregation With Consensus-Based Constructs
Woehr, D. J., Loignon, A. C., Schmidt, P. B., Loughry, M. L., & Ohland, M. (2015) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428115582090 · Cited by 233
Dunn, A. M., Heggestad, E. D., Shanock, L. R., & Theilgard, N. (2016) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-016-9479-0 · Cited by 233
Bowling, N. A., Huang, J. L. W., Bragg, C. B., Khazon, S., Liu, M., & Blackmore, C. E. (2016) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000085 · Cited by 206
Detecting careless respondents in web-based questionnaires: Which method to use?
Niessen, A. S. M., Meijer, R. R., & Tendeiro, J. N. (2016) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2016.04.010 · Cited by 206
How Careless Responding and Acquiescence Response Bias Can Influence Construct Dimensionality
Kam, C. C. S., & Meyer, J. P. (2015) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428115571894 · Cited by 180
Random Responding as a Threat to the Validity of Effect Size Estimates in Correlational Research
Credé, M. (2010) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164410366686 · Cited by 161
Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Entwicklung und erste Validierung eines Meßinstruments
Staufenbiel, T., & Hartz, C. (2000) · Diagnostica · doi:10.1026//0012-1924.46.2.73 · Cited by 154
Applying Social Psychology to Prevent Careless Responding during Online Surveys
Ward, M. K., & Meade, A. W. (2017) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12118 · Cited by 144
The Differential Impacts of Two Forms of Insufficient Effort Responding
DeSimone, J. A., DeSimone, A. J., Harms, P. D., & Wood, D. (2017) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12117 · Cited by 97
Überprüfung einer deutschsprachigen Skala zum Leader-Member-Exchange-Ansatz
Schyns, B. (2002) · Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie · doi:10.1024//0170-1789.23.2.235 · Cited by 71
Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ)
Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. E., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2007) · Default journal · Cited by 64
McGonagle, A. K., Huang, J. L. W., & Walsh, B. M. (2015) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12058 · Cited by 61
Using Random Group Resampling in multilevel research
Bliese, P. D., & Halverson, R. R. (2002) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(01)00104-7 · Cited by 52
Response invalidity in empirical research: Causes, detection, and remedies
Edwards, J. R. (2019) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2018.12.002 · Cited by 50
Cultural Differences in Careless Responding
Grau, I., Ebbeler, C., & Banse, R. (2019) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022119827379 · Cited by 34
Bollen, K. A., Gates, K. M., & Fisher, Z. F. (2018) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2018.1456341 · Cited by 27
Annen, H., Goldammer, P., & Tresch, T. S. (2015) · Military Psychology · doi:10.1037/mil0000063 · Cited by 11
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Weesie, 1999, Seemingly unrelated estimation and the cluster-adjusted sandwich estimator, Stata Technical Bulletin, 52, 34
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ward, M. K., & Meade, A. W. (2023) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-040422-045007 · Cited by 512
What makes for future entrepreneurs? The role of digital competencies for entrepreneurial intention
Bachmann, N., Rose, R., Maul, V., & Hölzle, K. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114481 · Cited by 224
Jaeger, S. R., & Cardello, A. V. (2022) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104676 · Cited by 113
Hillebrandt, A., & Barclay, L. J. (2022) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2612 · Cited by 94
The Lazy or Dishonest Respondent: Detection and Prevention
Arthur, W., Hagen, E., & George, F. (2020) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-055324 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldammer, P., Annen, H., Stöckli, P. L., & Jonas, K.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Goldammer, Philippe
- Venue
- The Leadership Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 101384
- ISSN
- 1048-9843 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3003804331
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 12.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Leadership Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Keywords
- careless responding, response sets, questionnaire validity, reaction time (psychology), Mahalanobis distance, residual variance, survey data quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review