Cited by 312Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesData Visualization and AnalyticsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interrogation of a dynamic visualization during learning

Lowe, Richard·2004·Learning and Instruction

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.003

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 27 references

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–312 of 312

Metadata

Authors
Lowe, R.
Affiliations
Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Lowe, Richard
Venue
Learning and Instruction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-06
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
257-274
ISSN
0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163567714
Cited by
312
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 22
FWCI
14.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Learning and Instruction (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Keywords
interactive animation, dynamic visualization, mental models, information search strategies, prediction tasks, instructional guidance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review