Cited by 381Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesScience Education and PedagogyData Visualization and Analytics

Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning

Lowe, Richard K.·1999·European Journal of Psychology of Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03172967

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lowe, R. K.
Affiliations
Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Lowe, Richard K.
Venue
European Journal of Psychology of Education
Published
1999-06
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
225-244
ISSN
  • 0256-2928 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-5174
OpenAlex
W2040297880
Cited by
381
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 20
FWCI
8.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Psychology of Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
Keywords
mental models, information extraction, causal explanation, selective attention, cognitive load, domain knowledge, meteorology education, weather map, visual learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review