The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Secondary school students’ conceptions of assessment and feedback
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Peterson and Irving (2008) found that it is important that teachers and students formulate individual student learning goals together.”
From Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice (2020) · cites this paper as Peterson and Irving (2008)
In the citing paper
“Content: High-quality feedback is needed that is honest, concise and yet sufficiently detailed (Fox-Turnbull, 2006; Hargreaves, 2013; Peterson & Irving, 2008).”
From Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice (2020) · cites this paper as Peterson & Irving, 2008
In the citing paper
“According to these researchers, this encourages students to reflect and act on feedback.”
From Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice (2020) · cites this paper as Peterson and Irving (2008)
Citations
Cites
Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research
McQuarrie, E. F., & Krueger, R. A. (1989) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3172912 · Cited by 15,489
Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research
Billson, J. M. (1989) · Human Biology · Cited by 8,560
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152
Motivational processes affecting learning.
Dweck, C. S. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.10.1040 · Cited by 6,971
Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups.
Kitzinger, J. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299 · Cited by 6,939
Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation.
Ames, C. (1992) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261 · Cited by 6,468
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Sadler, D. R. (1989) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117714 · Cited by 4,285
Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010) · Phi Delta Kappan · doi:10.1177/003172171009200119 · Cited by 4,231
Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543065003245 · Cited by 3,334
Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view.
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.97.1.19 · Cited by 2,726
Formative Assessment: Revisiting the Territory
Sadler, D. R. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050104 · Cited by 1,107
The Conscientious Consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning
Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2002) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070120099368 · Cited by 795
Teachers' conceptions of assessment: implications for policy and professional development
Brown, G. (2004) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594042000304609 · Cited by 519
Assessment for Learning: The differing perceptions of tutors and students
Maclellan, E. (2001) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930120063466 · Cited by 426
Teacher Feedback to Young Children in Formative Assessment: a typology
Tunstall, P., & Gsipps, C. (1996) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1080/0141192960220402 · Cited by 400
Assessment for Learning: 10 Principles
Broadfoot, P., Daugherty, R., Gardner, J., Harlen, W., James, M., & Stobart, G. (2002) · Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) · Cited by 389
Assessment as a tool for learning
Dochy, F. J. R. C., & McDowell, L. (1997) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/s0191-491x(97)86211-6 · Cited by 340
Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Brown, S. A. (1997) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/s0191-491x(97)86215-3 · Cited by 339
Fransson, A. (1977) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1977.tb02353.x · Cited by 291
Sambell, K., & McDowell, L. (1998) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0260293980230406 · Cited by 281
Vermetten, Y., Vermunt, J. D. H. M., & Lodewijks, H. G. L. C. (2002) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/s0959-4752(01)00013-5 · Cited by 212
Gifts, ping-pong and loops – linking feedback and learning
Askew, S., & Lodge, C. (2004) · doi:10.4324/9780203017678-4 · Cited by 201
Gijbels, D., & Dochy, F. (2006) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03055690600850354 · Cited by 196
(2004) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203017678 · Cited by 123
Conceptions of ability and related affects in task involvement and ego involvement.
Jagacinski, C. M., & Nicholls, J. G. (1984) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.5.909 · Cited by 121
The use of informational feedback in instruction: Implications for future research
Mory, E. (1992) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02296839 · Cited by 96
Testing, Motivation and Learning
Broadfoot, P., Harlen, W., Daugherty, R., Gardner, S. L., & James, M. E. (2002) · Bristol Research (University of Bristol) · Cited by 90
Assessing Using Grade-related Criteria: A single currency for universities?
Hornby, W. (2003) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0260293032000066254 · Cited by 80
Metacognitive instructional knowledge: cognitive mediation and instructional design
Elen, J., & Lowyck, J. (1999) · Lirias · Cited by 75
'I Don't Like Writing. It Makes My Fingers Hurt': Students talk about their classroom assessments
Brookhart, S. M., & Bronowicz, D. L. (2003) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594032000121298 · Cited by 72
Toward adaptive assessment — The student's angle
Birenbaum, M. (1994) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/0191-491x(94)90011-6 · Cited by 53
Formalist thinking and language arts instruction
Pajares, F., & Graham, L. (1998) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(98)80001-2 · Cited by 48
Students' Perceptions of Literacy Assessment
Moni, K., Kraayenoord, C. E. V., & Baker, C. D. (2002) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594022000027654 · Cited by 34
Woodhouse, J. H. (2002) · Cited by 34
Thomas, J. W., Bol, L., & Warkentin, R. (1991) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/bf00132292 · Cited by 31
Teacher feedback to students in numeracy lessons: Are students getting good value?
Knight, N. (2003) · set Research Information for Teachers · doi:10.18296/set.0704 · Cited by 24
Key facets of classroom grading: A comparison of teacher and student perspectives
Zeidner, M. (1992) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/0361-476x(92)90062-4 · Cited by 21
Carnell, E. (2004) · doi:10.4324/9780203017678-8 · Cited by 21
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Gibbs, G., Simpson, C., & Macdonald, R. (2003 August). Improving student learning though changing assessment – A conceptual and practical framework. Paper presented at the 10th Biennial EARLI Conference, Padova, Italy.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538 · Cited by 884
The future of student self-assessment: a review of known unknowns and potential directions.
Panadero, E., Brown, G. T. L., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2016) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2 · Cited by 388
Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice
Schildkamp, K., van der Kleij, F. M., Heitink, M. C., Kippers, W. B., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602 · Cited by 330
A cyclical self-assessment process: towards a model of how students engage in self-assessment
Yan, Z., & Brown, G. T. L. (2017) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1260091 · Cited by 275
Harks, B., Rakoczy, K., Hattie, J., Besser, M., & Klieme, E. (2013) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2013.785384 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Peterson, E. R., & Irving, S. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Peterson, Elizabeth R.
- Venue
- Learning and Instruction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 238-250
- ISSN
- 0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044381855
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 27.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Learning and Instruction (publishedVersion)
- ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Teaching and Learning Research Initiative
- New Zealand Council for Educational Research
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Keywords
- student conceptions of assessment, feedback, high school students, student perceptions, assessment for learning, teacher accountability, school accountability, student learning, New Zealand schools
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
