Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of knowledge and display design on comprehension of complex graphics

Canham, Matt, Hegarty, Mary·2010·Learning and Instruction

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.014

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Ainsworth, 2006, DeFT: a conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations, Learning and Instruction, 16, 183, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Carpenter, 1998, A model of the perceptual and conceptual processes in graph comprehension, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4, 75, 10.1037/1076-898X.4.2.75 · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.4.2.75 · Paper page
  3. Cheng, 1999, Interactive law encoding diagrams for learning and instruction, Learning and Instruction, 9, 10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00049-8 · DOI
  4. Haider, 1996, The role of information reduction in skill acquisition, Cognitive Psychology, 30, 304, 10.1006/cogp.1996.0009 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Haider, 1999, Eye movement during skill acquisition: more evidence for the information-reduction hypothesis, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2, 172, 10.1037/0278-7393.25.1.172 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Hegarty, M., Canham, M.S., Kriz, S. (2006, November). Interactions between knowledge and display design in interpretation of complex graphics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Houston, TX. · doi:10.1037/e527352012-170
  7. Henderson, 2003, Human gaze control during real-world scene perception, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 498, 10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.006 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Hoffman, 1993, Some considerations in using color in meteorological displays, Weather and Forecasting, 8, 505, 10.1175/1520-0434(1993)008<0505:SCIUCI>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0434(1993)008<0505:sciuci>2.0.co;2
  9. Jarodzka, 2010, In the eyes of the beholder: how experts and novices interpret dynamic stimuli, Learning and Instruction, 20, 146, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.019 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Körner, 2005, Concepts and misconceptions in comprehension of hierarchical graphs, Learning and Instruction, 15, 281, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.003 · DOI
  11. Kosslyn, 1989, Understanding charts and graphs, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3, 185, 10.1002/acp.2350030302 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Lohse, 1993, A cognitive model for understanding graphical perception, Human Computer Interaction, 8, 353, 10.1207/s15327051hci0804_3 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Lowe, 1993, Constructing a mental representation from an abstract technical diagram, Learning and Instruction, 3, 157, 10.1016/0959-4752(93)90002-H · DOI
  14. Lowe, 1994, Selectivity in diagrams: reading beyond the lines, Educational Psychology, 14, 467, 10.1080/0144341940140408 · DOI
  15. Lowe, 1996, Background knowledge and the construction of a situational representation from a diagram, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 11, 377, 10.1007/BF03173279 · DOI
  16. Myles-Worsley, 1988, The influence of expertise on X-ray image processing, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 553, 10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.553 · DOI
  17. Peebles, 2003, Modeling the effect of task and graphical representation on response latency in a graph-reading task, Human Factors, 45, 28, 10.1518/hfes.45.1.28.27225 · DOI
  18. Reingold, 2001, Visual span in expert chess players: evidence from eye movement, Psychological Science, 12, 48, 10.1111/1467-9280.00309 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Sanchez, 2006, An examination of the seductive details effect in terms of working memory capacity, Memory and Cognition, 34, 344, 10.3758/BF03193412 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Schnotz, 2003, Construction and interference in learning from multiple representations, Learning and Instruction, 13, 141, 10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00017-8 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Shah, 1995, Conceptual limitations in comprehending line graphs, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 337, 10.1037/0096-3445.124.1.43 · DOI
  22. Shah, 1999, Graphs as aids to knowledge construction, Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 690, 10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.690 · DOI
  23. Simkin, 1986, An information-processing analysis of graph perception, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 454, 10.2307/2289447 · doi:10.2307/2289447
  24. Sweller, 1994, Why some material is difficult to learn, Cognition and Instruction, 12, 10.1207/s1532690xci1203_1 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Canham, M., & Hegarty, M.
Venue
Learning and Instruction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
155-166
ISSN
0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991082842
Cited by
265
References
3
FWCI
18.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.