Cited by 186Molecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

An old method facing a new challenge: Re-visiting housekeeping proteins as internal reference control for neuroscience research

Open access
Li, Rena, Shen, Yong·2013·Life Sciences

Abstract

Study of specific target protein expression is often performed by western blotting, a commonly used method to measure the protein expression in neuroscience research by specific antibodies. Housekeeping proteins are used as an internal control for protein loading as well as reference in the western blotting analysis. This practice is based on the belief that such housekeeping genes are considered to be ubiquitously and constitutively expressed in every tissue and produce the minimal essential transcripts necessary for normal cellular function. The most commonly used housekeeping proteins are β-actin, β-tubulin, and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). However, recent studies have shown significant variation in some housekeeping genes both at the mRNA and protein levels in various neuropathological events, such as spinal cord injury and Alzheimer's diseases. Changes of housekeeping genes are also induced by non-neuronal diseases in various tissues. Therefore, these discoveries raise a potential concern regarding whether using a housekeeping protein as an internal standard for target protein analysis is an appropriate practice. This mini review will focus on (I) the effects of neuronal and non-neuronal diseases, experimental condition, and tissues-specific roles on alteration of housekeeping genes, and (II) alternative internal standards for gene and protein expression analysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lfs.2013.02.014

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent research shows that succinate is intensely produced by activated macrophages.

    “Recent research shows that succinate is intensely produced by activated macrophages [102].”

    From Protective Effects of PGC-1α Activators on Ischemic Stroke in a Rat Model of Photochemically Induced Thrombosis (2021) · cites this paper as [102]

    The sections on housekeeping proteins and pathological changes discuss β-actin, β-tubulin, and GAPDH, not succinate production. Searches for succinate and activated macrophages found no passage in our copy addressing the claim; the paper therefore cannot verify it. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, R., & Shen, Y.
Affiliations
Roskamp Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Li, Rena
Venue
Life Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
92
Issue
13
Pages
747-751
ISSN
0024-3205 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016751415
Cited by
186
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Life Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Association (IIRG-07-59510, IIRG-09-61521)
  • American Health Assistance Foundation (G2006-118)
  • National Institute of Health (R01AG032441-01, R01AG025888-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
housekeeping proteins, Western blot, beta-actin, beta-tubulin, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, spinal cord injury, Alzheimer's disease, neuropathology, tissue-specific gene expression
MeSH terms
Actins, Animals, Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenases, Humans, Models, Molecular, Neurons, Neurosciences, Proteins, Tubulin, Genes, Essential, Gene Expression Profiling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review