Cited by 463Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Biosensing Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

Coomassie staining as loading control in Western blot analysis

Welinder, Charlotte, Ekblad, Lars·2011·Journal of Proteome Research

Abstract

In Western blotting, immunodetection of housekeeping proteins is routinely performed to detect differences in electrophoresis loading. The present work describes a much faster and simpler protein staining method, which is compatible with ordinary blocking conditions. In addition, the method can be used after immunodetection with superior linearity compared to ordinary staining methods. After immunoblotting and staining, protein bands can be further identified using peptide mass fingerprinting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/pr1011476

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Total protein provides a stable reference measure that accounts for variation in protein loading and in the amount of protein transferred to the membrane, and can have superior linearity over a range of concentrations when compared to using a single reference protein.

    “Total protein provides a stable reference measure that accounts for variation in protein loading and in the amount of protein transferred to the membrane (Welinder and Ekblad, 2011), and can have superior linearity over a range of concentrations when compared to using a single reference protein (Aldridge et al., 2008; Eaton et al., 2013).”
  • Total protein as a loading control can provide a more consistent measure for sample normalization than use of a single housekeeping protein, as it may show better linearity with variation in protein loading and controls for differences in protein transfer to the membrane during Western blot.

    “The choice to use total protein as a loading control was informed by demonstrations that it can provide a more consistent measure for sample normalization than use of a single housekeeping protein, as it may show better linearity with variation in protein loading (Eaton et al., 2013) and it controls for differences in protein transfer to the membrane during the Western blot procedure (Welinder and”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Welinder, C., & Ekblad, L.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Ekblad, Lars
Venue
Journal of Proteome Research
Published
2011-02-03
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
1416-1419
ISSN
  • 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-3907
OpenAlex
W1993988048
Cited by
463
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 18
FWCI
7.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Proteome Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Keywords
Coomassie staining, loading control, housekeeping proteins, protein staining, Western blot, peptide mass mapping
MeSH terms
Animals, Peptide Mapping, Proteins, Rosaniline Dyes, Staining and Labeling, Blotting, Western, Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review